I Do!
Believe it or not, it's "Big Love" star Chloe Sevigny.
Television Mormon fundamentalist polygamist cult members never looked so good!
Reader Comments
(Page 2 of 2) Previous 15 Comments16. "Brown Bunny" Wasn't that the Stephen King novel about a bunny who couldn't shake off a turd?
Posted at 7:48PM on Jan 2nd 2009 by jen
17. Schweeet!
Posted at 9:50PM on Jan 2nd 2009 by You're Kidding!
18. She's possibly one of the dumbest actresses, alongside Margo Stilley, to ever step onto a screen in Hollywood. She has no class whatsoever, and she's a poor actress to boot, she's bland and boring, and the Brown Bunny, by Vincent Gallo, also showed how much of a classless waster Vincent Gallo is, as well, when he hoped Ebert's cancer would pretty much kill him.
But anyway, Sevigny has no class.
Posted at 4:50PM on Jan 3rd 2009 by Irritated by dimiwitted actors and actresses
19. I'll take ol' 38 in the background.
Posted at 9:51PM on Jan 2nd 2009 by Phoenix Richard
20. I kept reading all of these comments referring to "The Brown Bunny" & I had to look it up.
This was not skin flick, it was a serious movie & I personally think its pretty awesome that an an Academy Award & Golden Globe nominated actress dared to get so raw for the sake of a film that she believed in.
Posted at 11:19PM on Jan 2nd 2009 by The short chick in the back
21. She looks great! She had a banging body in Boys Don't Cry, and years later, she still looks great! Just because she's an indie actress, you can't discount her!
Posted at 3:15AM on Jan 3rd 2009 by Helen
22. She's totally hot! She has a great body, especially for her age. How many 30 year olds realistically look like her?
Posted at 3:13AM on Jan 3rd 2009 by Helen
23. No13 poster Steph............Since there is no such person as 'The Queen of England',only the Queen of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth I take it you're suggesting Chloe Sevigny is lacking in class?
Unless of course 'The Queen of England' is your real name and Steph is just a nom-de-plume.
In which case Chloe is indeed a very classy lady.
Either way,I'd bet my house on it that her body is way hotter than yours.So please do help yourself to another doughnut.
Posted at 7:15AM on Jan 3rd 2009 by Jack Meove
24. I have been told I look like her, and looking at this pic I would agree. Except I am shorter and thinner. Yea! I haven't seen Chloe for a long time. I love her acting and her style.
Posted at 9:42AM on Jan 3rd 2009 by Salsa!
25. It was not daring to 'perform' how she did, and it most certainly was not classy. The movie is onew ofthe worst films ever comitted to celluloid, and she knows that, as she was in the audience in Cannes. Daring it was not, stupid it most certainly was. She whored herself out for a role, and made a prostiture of herself., Would someone call Heidi Fleiss classy? Jenna Jameson? The local hooker on the street? I doubt it.
Posted at 5:16PM on Jan 3rd 2009 by Irritated by dimwitted actors and actresses
26. I can't believe how prudish some of these commenters are. She's an actress, and she did what she felt was right for the movie (The Brown Bunny that is). I agree that it's not a great movie, but that has little to do with the unsimulated sex act that everyone seems focused on. Furthermore, I'm sure people who don't even like that genre of film or who would not normally have even considered watching this movie ultimately decided to watch it just to see her sex scene with Vincent Gallo. If that makes her a prostitute, you all solicited her. Speaking of which, if this makes her a prostitute, then what exactly are porn stars? She is an excellent actress with a smokin' body, and while the Brown Bunny is something she'll have to live down, it shouldn't be because of the sex scene, it should be because it's simply not a good film.
Posted at 8:40PM on Jan 6th 2009 by Brody
27. Such "classy" comments.
Posted at 10:26PM on Jan 6th 2009 by auramac
28. #23- "Brown Bunny" came out long before Ebert's cancer battle, Gallo said at the time he hoped Ebert got colon cancer and Ebert replied that the tape of his colonoscopy was more entertaining than "Brown Bunny". Ebert gave the re-cut version of the film thumbs up, and they buried the hatchet.
#25- Well said, and it so happens she was dating Gallo at the time. If that makes her a prostitute, so is every woman who performs that act on their boyfriend.
Posted at 8:18AM on Jan 7th 2009 by Lucy
29. Gallo was not her boyfriend at the time. That was some PR thing that came out afterwards as a semi damage control. They had dated, just not at the time.
27. If you notice, I mentioned porn stars in post 24.
It was not the act so much as it was how far she went to humiliate herself fo a guy with an ego, who hadn't gotten any in quite some time. If you look at IMDB trivia section for this film, he fired alot of actresses before this, probably because they wouldn't do THAT for a person they didn't like. I've seen the scene and it is bizarrely stupid, the way it is written and performed. Her own agent wanted nothing more to do with her after this film. There is a review below which gives fairly accurate review of the cut version. And that thumbs up, that was more like a truce by Ebert.
http://www.reel.com/movie.asp?MID=139310&buy=open&Tab=reviews&CID=13#tabs
Posted at 5:23PM on Jan 8th 2009 by irritated by dimwitted actors and actresses
