Celebrity Justice
Judge Says Tyrese Has to Pay the Rent

Tyrese GibsonTyrese Gibson's 10-month marriage is starting to cost him dearly.

A judge today ordered Gibson to fork over $65,000 to his estranged wife Norma. In addition, he'll shell out $6,230/month in support, pay her rent ($2,730) and make her car payments ($800). But don't worry -- the judge ruled Tyrese can write off the rent and car payments!

It's all temporary -- she's contesting the prenup.

Tags: divorce, tyrese, tyrese gibson, TyreseGibson

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 3) | 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. i hate women who think they have a right to their husbands' money, especially when they have been married for so short a time. and doubly especially when they have a pre-nup. get a job, and not one that entails trying to get a spot on the next episode of Millionaire's Club.

Posted at 4:10PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by i still hate retards

2. It is legal stuff like this that makes women look bad. Does she seriously deserve $65K plus expenses for ten months of marriage? And what would possibly void the pre-nup? The point of a pre-nup is for everyone to be adult about who gets what in the case of a dissolution of marriage.

I have no idea what his soon-to-be-ex-wife does for a living, but I doubt the marriage hurt her ability to earn. Furthermore, $65K for ten months is good money for any kind of job.

Move on, honey. It's his money, not yours.

Posted at 4:17PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by KWDragon

3. She doesn't deserve this money. She needs to go out and get a job.

Posted at 4:15PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by akb

4. And, for the record, I felt the same way when K-Fed tried (and continues to try) to do the same to Britney. Men who do the same to women are no better.

When I divorced my first husband, we were young and had no pre-nup. We divided things according to who had what when we came into the relationship, and we were equitable with items we accumulated during the marriage.

Grow up, folks!

Posted at 4:15PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by KWDragon

5. That bitch was a gold digger from the start she was just looking to get i his pocket.

Posted at 4:33PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by Francine

6. why do women fight for equal rights and yet they cannot stand on their on two jimmy choo shoes,they have the right of our children,house,money and our heart,it makes marriage looks like prostitution for women,tyresse i pray you get justice.God bless you.

Posted at 6:42AM on Mar 3rd 2009 by archie mensah

7. I didn't even know he was married! Anyway, if they've been married for only 10 months, she's not entitled to more than she agreed to when she signed the pre-nup!

Posted at 4:42PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by say what?

8. Can you say Gold Digger.

Posted at 4:43PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by iride2wheels

9. Where is Tom Leykis when you need him?

Posted at 4:57PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by Eric in L.A.

10. It will teach him to keep his wiener in his pants

Posted at 5:02PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by Steph

11. I can't stand men/women who think just cause they marry a celebrity they're rolling in the money. why cant the laws uphold situations like this. It's sad that she's looking at the "paycheck" than wanting to be married. HELLO, idiot you could get way more staying married than the divorce!!

Posted at 5:03PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by Lyla

12. Money hungry ho

Posted at 5:25PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by Stephanie

13. I didn't know or realize he was married?!! didn't have a kid on the way?

Posted at 5:57PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by Ann Fallon

14. Who in the hell knew he was "married"?

Posted at 6:05PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by Isis74

15. This situation is ridiculous. She's a friggin' gold digger who is NOT employed (info from another site). She doesn't deserve anything except child support. Hmmmm... makes me sick, we as women have to do better for ourselves. Instead of getting pregnant by these men and then expecting to be set for life. SMDH

Posted at 6:10PM on Mar 2nd 2009 by Hmmmm...

| 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments