Home : Carrie Prejean : Carrie Prejean -- I Was Only 17!

Carrie Prejean -- I Was Only 17!

Posted May 5th 2009 5:17PM by TMZ Staff

Carrie PrejeanSo someone sent us pictures two days ago of Carrie Prejean -- showing the Miss California/Miss USA runner-up modeling topless, partially covering her breasts with her hands and wearing panties. So, we ask, What would Jesus think?

We contacted Carrie's rep, who gave us this statement yesterday: "This was a photo that was taken several years ago, when Carrie first started modeling. In her naivete, an agent convinced her to pose for this photo to submit to a lingerie company, claiming they could make her the next Victoria's Secret model. She has since learned what a lie that was, and what a mistake it was to have the photo taken."

A short time later, we got a second statement: "Is there any allowance for the fact that she was a minor when the photo was taken, that would allow you not to post? She was only 17."

We had our doubts ... especially when comparing the photos to photos of Carrie at the Miss California Teen USA pageant in 2004, a few months before her 18th birthday. But we just got a handwritten statement from Carrie herself, and she's towing the line: "The photo in question was taken when I was a minor, several months before the 2005 pageant. The photo was not meant for disclosure to the general public."

Carrie PrejeanA honcho at Miss California USA told us Carrie may have violated her contract, because she represented several times in writing that she never posed nude or partially nude for any photo. We're here to tell you ... that's not true.

We haven't posted the pics and won't unless we know she was over 18.

Tags: carrie prejean, CarriePrejean, miss california, miss usa, MissCalifornia, MissUsa, pageant, photos, topless

Comments [260]
SHARE |
4ie6

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 18) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. SHE IS A DISGRACE

Posted at 5:21PM on May 5th 2009 by SHE NEEDS TO BE DISCROWNED

2. perez had the pic posted on his site and i'd say she looks older than 17

Posted at 5:22PM on May 5th 2009 by cathyL

3. Even if this was true why on earth would a good christian girl want to be a Victoria Secret model. Any way you look at it she is wrong to pass judgement on others.

Posted at 5:26PM on May 5th 2009 by hahahaha

4. Well--I guess that was b4 her country--her family became Christian!
She's a disgrace, a liar, a hypocrite, and a whore!

Posted at 5:54PM on May 5th 2009 by she's a dumb whore!

5. I SAW THE PICS COURTESY OF HER GAY BOY NEMESIS PEREZ HILTON. BIG FREAKIN DEAL. LOOKED PRETTY INNOCENT TO ME. HOWEVER SHE CAN MAKE HUGE MONEY POSING FOR PLAYBOY TODAY! KINDA MAKES UP FOR THE CASH IF SHE GETS BOOTED OUT AS MISS CALI. JUST SAYIN.

Posted at 5:28PM on May 5th 2009 by 3 hot chics & 1 pimpin gangsta

6. We call her a hypocrite because, like many bible-thumpers, she picks and chooses which of the rules should apply and which shouldn't as is convenient to her life. What about the body being a temple? How is it OK that she carved up hers so she could have big titties? What about only sharing your nakedness with your betrothed? My biggest problem, however, isn't with her. She's just another sheep blindly following and believing what her mommy and daddy told her. The issue I have is the right-leaning morons that jumped on her bandwagon and made her their covergirl without having a clue as to what kind of person she really is. Kind of like when the abstinence brigade jumped on Palin's wagon before they found out she couldn't even convince her own daughter to use BIRTH CONTROL. So, now, we have one more young girl raising another baby, probably on her way to public assitance. Yeah, that's the ticket!

Posted at 5:29PM on May 5th 2009 by lost in lalaland

7.
This means she lied. In other words, she was not "Biblically correct."

Thanks for exposing her true Christian values.

Posted at 5:30PM on May 5th 2009 by Bonnie Russell

8. This is really getting old and tired. Leave this girl alone. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. Has TMZ gone to "anything for a buck," If so, I am done reading and watching.

Posted at 5:32PM on May 5th 2009 by sjj

9. This picture stuff is typical liberal crap. What would happen to the economy in this country if the Conservatives finally get fed up with the constant assault on them and decide to start boycotting the liberal companies like TMZ and the other liberal media outlets in retaliation for the constant smear of any conservative? Ask your local newspaper how being so one sided and pro liberal is working out for them if they are still in business. Leave the girl alone.

Posted at 5:31PM on May 5th 2009 by cowbulls

10. We call her a hypocrite because, like many
bible-thumpers, she picks and chooses which of the rules should apply
and which shouldn't as is convenient to her life. What about the body
being a temple? How is it OK that she carved up hers so she could
have big titties? What about only sharing your nakedness with your
betrothed? My biggest problem, however, isn't with her. She's just
another sheep blindly following and believing what her mommy and
daddy told her. The issue I have is the right-leaning morons that
jumped on her bandwagon and made her their covergirl without having a
clue as to what kind of person she really is. Kind of like when the
abstinence brigade jumped on Palin's wagon before they found out she
couldn't even convince her own daughter to use BIRTH CONTROL. So,
now, we have one more young girl raising another baby, probably on
her way to public assitance. Yeah, that's the ticket!

Posted at 5:31PM on May 5th 2009 by lost in lalaland

11. Not buying it. I saw the picture (before learning of the POSSIBLE age thing), Is it customary for an "agent" to get a candidate to take a picture in a bathroom? You can see the lotion and other bathroom items in the background.

Either way, she is only playing the Christian card because it's the only hypocratical group that will take her in.

Posted at 5:31PM on May 5th 2009 by Brian

12. if you wanna see it nik richie has it on his site @
thedirty dot com

Posted at 5:32PM on May 5th 2009 by neil starks

13. Now this is all because she didn't go along kicking and screaming that gay marriage is good. She not a disgrace, she a woman that answered a question and the gay facist will attack anyone who don't agree with them. Majority of the country is against gay marriage. No one attacked the blacks when they voted 70% against gay marriage in California, why? Dont forget the Asian voted 65% against gay marriage also.

Posted at 5:33PM on May 5th 2009 by Lenn K.

14. I am so thrilled she is going down the drain. Good bye, homophobic.

Posted at 5:56PM on May 5th 2009 by R

15. In today's instant exposure environment.........EVERY picture should be considered "for the general public" whether intended or not! HELLO!

Plus...from what I've heard, she was pretty much flat as a board before the new rack paid for by the CA Pageant System...

Posted at 5:34PM on May 5th 2009 by McCool

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments