Carrie Prejean -- I Was Only 17!

Carrie PrejeanSo someone sent us pictures two days ago of Carrie Prejean -- showing the Miss California/Miss USA runner-up modeling topless, partially covering her breasts with her hands and wearing panties. So, we ask, What would Jesus think?

We contacted Carrie's rep, who gave us this statement yesterday: "This was a photo that was taken several years ago, when Carrie first started modeling. In her naivete, an agent convinced her to pose for this photo to submit to a lingerie company, claiming they could make her the next Victoria's Secret model. She has since learned what a lie that was, and what a mistake it was to have the photo taken."

A short time later, we got a second statement: "Is there any allowance for the fact that she was a minor when the photo was taken, that would allow you not to post? She was only 17."

We had our doubts ... especially when comparing the photos to photos of Carrie at the Miss California Teen USA pageant in 2004, a few months before her 18th birthday. But we just got a handwritten statement from Carrie herself, and she's towing the line: "The photo in question was taken when I was a minor, several months before the 2005 pageant. The photo was not meant for disclosure to the general public."

Carrie PrejeanA honcho at Miss California USA told us Carrie may have violated her contract, because she represented several times in writing that she never posed nude or partially nude for any photo. We're here to tell you ... that's not true.

We haven't posted the pics and won't unless we know she was over 18.

Tags: carrie prejean, CarriePrejean, miss california, miss usa, MissCalifornia, MissUsa, pageant, photos, topless

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 18) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. There are starving people in Africa.

Posted at 5:44PM on May 5th 2009 by .44 Magnum

32. What's the difference between her "topless" photo and the pageant photo of her in a bikini?

You're offended by the side of her breast that you can see?....But not by her cleavage in the bikini shot?

Posted at 5:46PM on May 5th 2009 by Sarah

33. Also, she showed great character answering a question that should be asked if you are not allowed to answer it. She has been wronged. But she did right. And I disagree with her.

Posted at 7:43PM on May 5th 2009 by dennis

34. TMZ has child porn on the computers? I would delete that before the FBI gets involved... The Feds take child porn pretty damn seriously.

Posted at 5:49PM on May 5th 2009 by Jay

35. No way that whore is only 17 in those photos. Jesus is gonna be real mad at her come Judgement Day!

Posted at 8:07PM on May 5th 2009 by PhillipP

36. Just leave the girl alone. So what she said she did't agree with gay marriage. That's no different than you not agreeing with her own beliefs. Plus, if you guys think she is so horrible, then stop talking about her. You're giving her even more time in the spotlight. It's amazing how hypocritical EVERYONE in this country is whether liberal or conservative. And just because you're a Christian doesn't mean you don't make mistakes like everyone else. Any Christian who claims that they are perfect and have every answer aren't true Christians anyway and this girl never claimed to be perfect. She just doesn't agree with a particular lifestyle. LEAVE HER ALONE!

Posted at 5:51PM on May 5th 2009 by Lorie

37. I think the Perez Judge has been a total FREAK!! getting all of this started for FREEDOM OF SPEECH!

The Beauty Pagent should never have a crazy judge like this in the first place. This pictures are nothing but someone showing their back!

Posted at 5:52PM on May 5th 2009 by jason

38. Waa waa waa. I was young. I was dumb. I was duped. What kind of Christian is she having this pics taken at 17?! Live and let live Baby.

Posted at 5:54PM on May 5th 2009 by Jackie

39. Its too bad that if you don't agree with the far left on everything you are prosecuted. Isn't there anyone else the far left can hang by a tree than this girl? Give me a break.

Posted at 5:52PM on May 5th 2009 by Ut Oh

40.
She's not nude people!!! So no it's not porno, and no she didn't violate her agreement, the naughty bits are all covered.

Posted at 5:54PM on May 5th 2009 by Larry

41. You people really need to get a life. Most of you posting shes not Christian are probably the biggest liars to yourselves, and everyone you post to. I would be willing to assume that everyone of you that are bashing people for "not being christian" are not either unless you are a priest. Get a life of your own and also those who live in glass houses should not throw stones and do pass judgement on someone before being judged yourself.

Posted at 6:06PM on May 5th 2009 by Joe

42. My it is amazing how everyone is shocked to see a little skin. How provincial we have become.

Posted at 5:57PM on May 5th 2009 by Linda Mott

43. Shouldn't whoever asked her to pose for them be prosecuted for child porn? I really despise this chick because no matter what happens, she wants to have it both ways.

Posted at 5:59PM on May 5th 2009 by Stella Cadente

44. I am a gay man and I do not care that Ms. Prejean is against gay marriage. Do I wish she had a different opinion? Yes, I do. But that is beside the point. What I care about is her blatant hypocrisy. She claims that she is against gay marriage because of her values and her Christian faith and "that God was testing me with that question". Yet, she clearly has no problem posing for semi-nude photos. Where in the Good Book is it o.k. for a young woman to defile and debase her body by posing nude and sexually suggestive? Doesn't the bible say we are to treat our body as a temple and that a young woman is to ONLY show her body to her husband. Again, I don't care that she posed for the photos. It is not an issue for me. She is a beautiful woman. It is the hypocrisy. People like her try to force their religious beliefs down other people's throats, willing to deny others their rights because to them, it's against God, it's against Christianity. Yet these same people pick and choose which of God's laws and rules they will adhere to in their own life.

If you are against gay marriage, then fine! But don't hide behind your religion when you can't follow the damn rules yourself. Just admit that you are an ignorant bigoted person! Own it.

Posted at 5:56PM on May 5th 2009 by CSS

45. Despite her shameless pandering and pathetic victim complex, I feel pity for this woman. She is clearly a sad and desperate creature. If the Christianists were hoping for an Anita Bryant-Act II, they were sadly mistaken.

Posted at 5:56PM on May 5th 2009 by Erin

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments