Sugar Ray frontman Mark McGrath has been with the same woman, Carin Kingsland, for 15 years -- but the two haven't gotten hitched. We asked why he still hasn't popped the question ... in front of her. This gets awkward ...

See More
Reader Comments
(Page 1 of 2) | 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 15 CommentsMARK McGRATH is perfectly right not to "settle" down. "Marriage" takes all the life out of the relationship, and then boredom is born. Marriage is out dated and over rated. Mark is ahead of his time. Stick to your guns handsome! Oh yeah, I am a heterosexual woman, and like many men, not all of us want to get tied down, well, maybe tied down, but not married. ; )
Seriously? I mean Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell aren't married and you say NOTHING about them, but yet you start on them for not being married? Weird and hypocritical.
Thought that was Oct-o-mom. Thinking who the heck would hook up with her. Relieved it's someone else.
who cares if they are married or not - if they are happy let them be!
Don't put a ring on it. If it's not broke don't fix it. 15 years and still going strong, if it were that important to her, she would have left by now. GOOD FOR THEM!!!
TMZ, why don't you ask when Tim Robbins is going to marry his mother instead???
Nice, TMZ dumbasses. Your "ask any awkward question you can, to get a response" ambush tactics will soon backfire on you. I expect we'll have a celebrity ask one of your gayyyyboy photographers "does your mom & dad know you like to blow little boys"?
They've been together for 15 years. He has kids by her. She's at his beck and call. Now, please tell me. What would be his motivation to marry her?
Hey - anyone think she might not want to marry him? Not all women want to get married.
IN GOD'S EYES IT'S A SIN AND NOT A GOOD EXAMPLE FOR HIS CHILD. HE LIVES BY WORLDLY STANDARDS NOT GODS!!!!!
I don't waste my time with such nonsense - as in watching your videos like this. And people have already said what I would say also, why not pose the same question to Robbins and Sarandon and Hawn and Russell all long time committed relationships without marriage. Oh yeh, Winfrey and Grahm too. Marriage is not always a necessity, in order to take the vows it should be entered into it and WANTED by both parties, not just one. Sure there are certain benefits to marriage when it comes to tax purposes and yes vows should mean something to both individuals but in the end, a committed relationship is equally important. Vows get broken on a regular basis. Divorce is rabid. And I'm sure the bastard children commenters are going to weigh in, rolls eyes, ugh, I'm pretty certain these particular cases cited above (those with children) have their father's last name, and they support their children, and if they were to break up the relationship, not only would they have to pay child support but their partner would also draw support and property etc. So with that said, it does come down to that old saying, it's pretty much just a piece of paper, and a lot of money spent for a place to get married and the party afterwards.

















