TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

David Hasselhoff's Ex -- Over Your Dead Body!

5/11/2009 12:30 PM PDT BY TMZ STAFF

David Hasselhoff & Pamela BachDavid Hasselhoff's ex, Pamela Bach, wants to make sure ... if David croaks, the spousal support keeps a comin'.

Pamela has asked the judge in their never-ending divorce for an order, requiring David to maintain life insurance, which would pay her support if David dies. There's actually a law in California giving judges the power to make such an order -- seriously!

But David doesn't want to shell out the dough for the life insurance, claiming it wasn't part of their divorce deal.

So until death do us part doesn't really mean that ...who knew?


Launch photos

38 COMMENTS

No Avatar
1.

PEPSI Generation    

OH shut UP!

1802 days ago
2.

Terri    

She's a real piece of work -- true bitch! Not that I think highly of him, but ugh, scab that bitch!

1802 days ago
3.

Linda Mott    

I think he needs a restraining order and a body guard. She really sounds like a nut.

1802 days ago
4.

Ooooo Noooo!    

What a Gold Digger. Get a job you flake!

1802 days ago
5.

Fox    

Wow, what a lazy piece of sh*t. I feel bad for guys when they get divorced because the women are trying to take everything away from them, even their kids. I have never been supported by a man and think women like that are lazy, disgusting, c*nts. Have some self-respect! I dont think I'd want a penny from my ex-husband.

1802 days ago
6.

PEPSI Generation    

screw the pooch and shut your`t yap.

1802 days ago
7.

Q    

There is also a law like that in NY. It's actually quite common. Moreso however for when there are minor children involved, if the main bread winner croaks, the children could potentially be screwed. In this case though, she's just a money grubbing whench.

1802 days ago
8.

Moi    

She's a nut job! No wonder the man drinks like he does!

1802 days ago
9.

Me in DC    

If he gets life insurance, I hope he just names his children as beneficiaries! The ex-wife does not need to get any more money out of him than what was originally agreed upon! If she can't live on what he is giving her now, then she should go to Walmart and get a job to supplement her income!

1802 days ago
10.

Harriet    

I am not wildly enthused by David's behavior (the drinking) but when compared to his wife he is a saint. What a piece of crap she is.

1802 days ago
11.

Me    

Know what I love about Harvey? As an attorney, he's well aware of how the law works. But when he writes this garbage, he always tries to feign complete shock to put a spin on it.

Life insurance beneficiary re support? That's pretty much the norm if you have a good attorney who remembers to add it in. Evidently her attorney forgot to cover that before settlement. Oops.

1802 days ago
12.

xcalibur    

GET A FREAKIN JOB LIKE EVERY NORMAL PERSON! OBVIOUSLY SHE'S A DOUCHE BAG!!!!!!!!!!!!

1802 days ago
13.

ME    

WHY DO THESE IDIOT ASS WOMEN THINK THEY CAN SPONGE OFF A MAN WHILE NEVER WORKING A DAY IN THEIR LIFE. SHE'S JUST LIKE HULK HOGAN'S EX-COW - EXPECTING A MAN THEY DUMPED TO CONTINUE SUPPORTING THEM. GET A FREAKIN' JOB YOU LOW LIFE BITCH.

1802 days ago
14.

Mike    

7. There is also a law like that in NY. It's actually quite common. Moreso however for when there are minor children involved, if the main bread winner croaks, the children could potentially be screwed. In this case though, she's just a money grubbing whench.

Posted at 11:49AM on May 11th 2009 by Q

"The children could potential be screwed"? And by "screwed" you mean the children may have to live the life of the 97% of the rest of the children in this Country? Without multimillions of dollars at their disposal? Boo Hoo! Or if by "screwed" you mean the lesser earning spouse may actually have to contribute financially to the rearing of the children? And I always thought that it takes two to make a child meaning both should share in the financial obligations... unless one makes more money, in which case it only takes one and that one should pay for everything.

1802 days ago
15.

David    

This is sick...and for it to be legal is even sicker....

1802 days ago
| 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web