Here's the 16-year-old back in 1981(left) -- and 28 years later, the 43-year-old version at an event in Hollywood this week (right).
Who wouldn't headbutt a fashion designer for her?!
Brooke Shields: Good Genes or Good Docs?
Beauty
5/24/2009 2:30 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
66 COMMENTS
61.
Commenter #63 - She most certainly does NOT look "just right" for her age. She has the skin of a fifty year old . . . and apparently you do too.
0
0
62.
It's usually both. She's definitely had some work on her nose.....very slight, and it looks good. Other than that, I think she looks the way a 43 year old should look. No better or worse than average.
0
0
63.
I love brook shields and i think she's gorgeous but in the 2009 picture she kinda looks like she was once a man
0
0
64.
She hasn't been cute since Blue Lagoon. She never aged well. She sure isn't looking good in the recent pic
0
0
65.
#41 and 45 Black men hook up with white women because they were denied white women for so many years. Have we forgot they would het hung for being accused of looking at a white woman? So, now they can have one without being killed and they consider it an accomplishment, considering history. It's not so much because of how they look, because it they could fast forward 20 years and see Brooke they would stick with the queen.
0
0
66.
Both candids are unflattering and don't do her justice at any age.
After 28 years, she still looks amazing because she was born to look amazing by virtue of her unique features.
NO plastic surgery either, the nose is thinner now because she has lost some colagens as people do when they age.
0
0
