Britney Spears Sued

Britney Spears is being sued by the photog who got run over ... and we got the whole thing on tape.

Britney Spears: Click to watch
Rick Mendoza was a casualty of Britney's Mercedes as she was pulling out of a Beverly Hills parking structure in 2007.

In his lawsuit, Mendoza says Britney's people -- who are also defendants -- "should have known...Britney was not in the mental, emotional and/or physical condition to operate the subject motor vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner."

She ran over his foot ... and it did look painful.

FOOTnote: TMZ auctioned off his sock.



Tags: britney spears, BritneySpears, lawsuit, paparazzi, video

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 12) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. This is totally ridiculous! If your standing that close to a moving car your going to get hit! This guy is just trying to make some $!

Posted at 3:25PM on May 29th 2009 by Courtney

17. It was Mendoza's own fault - the risk he takes by jumping out in front of a moving car in order to snap a pic. Perhaps he should have instead filed a Worker's Comp claim.

Posted at 4:57PM on May 29th 2009 by Nichole

18. TOO BAD HE DIDN'T GET TIRE TRACKS ON HIS FACE. THE PAPS ASK FOR EVERYTHING THEY GET.

Posted at 3:35PM on May 29th 2009 by Carla

19. Couldnt have been that bad he walked away and kept taping her.

Posted at 3:31PM on May 29th 2009 by Zisforzebra

20. If the STUPID "photogs" would get out of the celebs way they wouldn't get ran over!

Posted at 4:12PM on May 29th 2009 by Ashley

21. how does that happen? the photog didnt realize a car was that close to his foot?! i think he pretty much took the risk when he started to crawl all over a MOVING VEHICLE.

Posted at 3:33PM on May 29th 2009 by Britneyboo

22. Hazards of the job for a piece of sh*t paparazzi!

Posted at 3:58PM on May 29th 2009 by sheesh

23. my opinion: it's his own fault, he asked for it by standing so close. what was he thinking???

if it was me driving then i would put it in reverse and drive over it again. dumba$$

Posted at 3:37PM on May 29th 2009 by Gigi

24. I'm no Brittney fan, but the photographer asked for it and shouldn't have been standing underneath the car. Retard.

Posted at 3:36PM on May 29th 2009 by KP

25. He complains she wasn't of sound mind, look in a mirror moron. Standing in front of a moving car is a smart move? take their picture but don't get in their way.

Posted at 4:31PM on May 29th 2009 by Jeff

26. The whole reason he was there, rubbing up against Britney's car, was to take full advantage of the publicity that he is now arguing should have led Britney's 'People' to a place where they "should have known...Britney was not in the mental, emotional and/or physical condition to operate the subject motor vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner." - Why isn't he responsible?

Posted at 3:37PM on May 29th 2009 by bubbajk

27. That guy's an idiot. I agree with susan: "If the paparazzi are stupid enough to get that close to a moving car they deserve to get run over."

Amen. He's a shark. Wait. No. He's a guppy playing a shark's game. What a jerk. The video says it all.

Britney should counter-sue for payment of all legal fees related to this blatantly frivolous lawsuit!

Posted at 3:37PM on May 29th 2009 by Kitten

28. who gives a f*** about the paparazzi they should all get ran over

Posted at 10:10PM on May 29th 2009 by lauren

29. LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!!!!!!!

Posted at 3:40PM on May 29th 2009 by Leave Britney Alone

30. Okay, this is one of those frivolous lawsuits. Hello! What did you think would happen when you stand in the way of a moving vehicle? This guy is lame.

Posted at 3:42PM on May 29th 2009 by Megan

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments