Beauty
Mickey Rourke: Good Genes or Good Docs?

Mickey Rourke rebuilt his damaged career by playing "The Wrestler" ... and he doesn't have the scars to prove it.

Mickey Rourke

Here's the 31-year-old back in 1984 (left) -- and 25 years later, the 56-year-old version earlier this year (right).

He's as good as new.



Tags: Mickey Rourke, MickeyRourke

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 5 of 6) Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

61. Yea Michael Jacksons doc Doctor Frankenstein

Posted at 12:24AM on May 31st 2009 by HmlTonyn

62. Good as new?
Don't get me wrong- I think he's a nice guy and all of that but..
You can use his forehead for a drive-in-movie screen. His nose looks like a chicken drumstick. You can see the implants in his cheeks and he has cauliflower ears,

Posted at 2:33AM on May 31st 2009 by Martina

63. I like how it's filed under "beauty". - Hilarious

Should be

Mickey Rourke.....
Good Genes
Good Docs
Bad Bad Docs

Posted at 12:48AM on May 31st 2009 by Monika

64. uruuityk

Posted at 1:25AM on May 31st 2009 by Monika

65. Actually, I thought his face was supposed to look worse than that...If he would lose the scuzzy goatee and cut his hair he wouldn't be THAT bad. Not saying he looks great or would look as good as he used to, but it would be an improvement.

Posted at 1:42AM on May 31st 2009 by Annie2

66. This has got to be the cruelest joke poll ever! Of course neither of those. It's Bad Docs. Release a realistic poll and see alot more people voting

Posted at 2:16AM on May 31st 2009 by Blue

67. Good genes of good docs are you crazy he messed up getting all that plastic surgery, in the Wrestler you could see where they did a face lift or face tighting of something his ears are toooo low and you can see where they did the work. He looks crazy.... He would look like a 50 something would if he would not have went so far.

Posted at 4:01AM on May 31st 2009 by heather

68. He looks a mess!!

Posted at 5:07AM on May 31st 2009 by Proud American

69. TMZ,youcan't paly the good genes/good docs game with Mickey. Likeothers have said, Mickeyahs said, he had palstic surger,and not for beauty, buttorepair boxinginjuries. How about MickeyRourke, Bad life/Good life. He started out having it all:looks,talent,A-list, the hot ,young ,sexy man. thenhe went to boxing to try again where he was he he dabbled inboxing when he was young. Bad life...misteps, being on the Hoolywood Z list, the ,...HE cleaned hismelf up professionally, persoanlly and here is to wishing him the best. It is not how to start out, but how you finish.

Posted at 8:55AM on May 31st 2009 by Whoa

70. not really good docs is it?

Posted at 4:34PM on May 31st 2009 by Billy

71. REALLY? that poll isn't even necessary. he doesn't even look like the same person! I think it's pretty obvious he goes under the knife...

Posted at 12:24PM on May 31st 2009 by Rachel

72. where is the bad doc option?

Posted at 9:02PM on Jun 1st 2009 by xxx

73. His facelift is so bad they took out his sideburns

Posted at 7:47PM on May 31st 2009 by Babycakes

74. How can you even word the question "good docs"? Horrible docs fits much better.

Posted at 9:35PM on May 31st 2009 by marriedmom

75. As a self-actualized actor and athlete, Mr. Rourke has endured emotional as well as many physical traumas. He was genetically beautiful and continues to be very attractive. His allure transends the mere physical.

Posted at 11:57PM on May 31st 2009 by jj25x2

Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments