K-Fed's Nanny Tour -- 2009

Kevin Federline has taken his nanny show overseas -- he's following Britney Spears abroad with his broad and will make a small fortune this month -- babysitting.

Kevin Federline

Our sources say Britney will take Sean Preston and Jayden James everywhere she tours -- next stop ... London. During the month of June, we're told K-Fed will rake in approximately $30,000 for his babysitting services -- this on top of the $20k he already gets a month in child support. True enough, it's what Britney has to pay so she can take the kids on the road.

So $30,000 for making sure the nanny makes a proper PB&J ... where do we sign up?!

Tags: briney spears, BrineySpears, child support, ChildSupport, Kevin federline, KevinFederline, tour

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 4 of 6) Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

46. how the F*CK can u get paid to look after ur own kids?!?
i mean ... he's like on vacation 24/7 doing nothin' but bowling n' partying in vegas.
move on Kevin n be a father 4 ur 2 angels not a paid nanny!

Posted at 5:47PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by stEMO

47. Seriously, this is pathetic ... why the HELL should he get paid for taking care of his own children. He gets alimony and I'm sure his expenses are covered. I don't know how he can even show his face in public ... he is a pathetic loser.

Posted at 5:54PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by Jacklyn Vincenzo

48. To bad he is the only "normal" thing in their lives. She has no clue on how to be a mother.If she loved her kids she would be at home with them not dragging them all over the place for a fake concert where she does not sing.She is supposed to be a singer ? Right? Their therapy needs to start now before they turn into a freak like their mother doing drugs , drinking, walking around half dresses and speaking in different accents. She does not deserve to have full custody of those boys ever !!!

Posted at 6:32PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by Theresa

49. its not called babysitting if its your own kids. this guy is a total loser and its sad thats how much she has to pay to have a career and still be able to see her kids

Posted at 6:35PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by eva

50. Actually, it's rather nice that the kids will have contact with both parents throughout the tour. If K-Fed were the ex-wife instead of the ex-husband, nobody would think badly of the arrangement. He does have to put any of his own plans on hold in order to travel around with Britney, so why not get $$$ for it? Before y'all yell that "he has no plans" - how do you know? He's done tv acting, commercials, and "show up and we'll pay you for the publicity" things at clubs (don't understand it, but I would take the money and run, too...) This way, he can focus on the kids and she can focus on the tour. It keeps things more normal for the kids, who are still pretty young to be lugged around like this.

It's also a good backup plan in case the stress gets to Britney and she starts acting freaky around the kids again - I wouldn't trust her around the kids without supervision myself. She's improved greatly, but she's still quite fragile and is likely to remain fragile for a very long time.

It's really good for kids when their divorced parents get along and can cooperate in a friendly fashion.

Posted at 6:42PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by jwoolman

51. OMG..What a looooooooooooooooooooooooooser! And his ugly girlfriend too!

Posted at 6:48PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by shadylady

52. I bet Brit-Brit is now thinkking that K-Fed is one of her costliest mistakes.

Posted at 6:56PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by TMZFAN

53. Federline is a money WHORE.He's more of a bitch then a man.

Posted at 7:43PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by barney16

54. When will people get it through their heads that it's not called 'babysitting' when they're your own kids? He is being paid to PARENT. Can't stand either one of the two, but in this case, he's coming out ahead. Agreed that since she's the one with all the dough that she pay him (it's only fair. Men have been paying child support to women for decades and what's good for the goose is good for the gander.) I think it's always better for kids to be with the parents instead of nannies so it's good he's there for his kids. Just don't understand why he's getting so much extra additional (unless he's got nannies with him, in which case, he's definitely doing it for the attention and money and NOT for his kids.) Some people don't even have that much money to raise their kids YEARLY, let alone every month.

Posted at 7:53PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by Chris

55. WTF!!!! So now moms must pay dad's to watch there own kids. Will $hit, My wife owes me big time.

Posted at 7:55PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by twitter.comryan928

56. no amount of money, nothing...notta ...can dress him up! I just feel bad his lawyers who wrangle all these deals so they can get a percentage, don't have to pay as much as Brittany to see thier kids. It is financially advantageous for the lawyers & Kfed to have custody so they can make money! And let's not forget to take the girlfriend along. UGH!!!

Posted at 7:57PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by awave

57. glad to see this doesn't cut into any quality time with his other two children with Char or whatever her name is....

btw, shouldn't he just bring those two other kids with him and just BE A DAD? Didn't know there was a salary to go with this responsibility...

Posted at 8:05PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by ilovetheshowmadmen

58. The court system could have taken the kids completely away from Britney
and given them to Kevin 100% of the time,considering her past.
The little bit of money she's paying him is nothing compared to her income.

Posted at 1:58PM on Jun 4th 2009 by jm

59. It's not called babysitting when it's your own kids,

Posted at 8:38PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by montrey

60. scumbag charges to watch his on kids?

Posted at 8:41PM on Jun 3rd 2009 by fbjsr

Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments