Home : Paparazzi Video, Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox : Wedgie Justice -- Man Ripped for Shooting Fox

Wedgie Justice -- Man Ripped for Shooting Fox

Posted Jun 24th 2009 10:35AM by TMZ Staff

Getting a shot of Megan Fox can be a serious pain in the butt -- and one super-intrusive paparazzi learned it the hard way Monday night in Hollywood.

Megan Fox & Shia LaBeouf: Click to watch
While chowing down with Shia LaBeouf after the "Transformers 2" premiere, one dude ran into the restaurant, bum rushed their table, snapped a pic and booked it. Only problem: Their bodyguard was faster.

Security chased the D-bag down and used the atomic-wedgie technique to keep him from escaping. All while Shia and Megan got a laugh at the moron's expense.

See Also



Tags: megan fox, MeganFox, shia labeouf, ShiaLabeouf, transformers, transformers revenge of the fallen, TransformersRevengeOfTheFallen, video

Comments [58]
SHARE |
4ie6

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 4) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. The pap made a rookie misstake. Once he entered the restaurant he entered a PRIVATE place, not a PUBLIC, place. The owner can have that pap removed at any time and have him arrested. People make a common misstake on places like restaurants, casinos and amusement parks. These are private places open to the public but the owner retains the right to remove anyone at anytime. If a pap enters a restaurant that caters to people like Shia and Megan and harasses them the owner of the restaurant is perfectly in his right to remove him. I think I would have spoke to the pap and gave him a warning and maybe not press charges this one time. Police can issue warning citations and if the pap behaves himself and want see further legal action. Also, there was no need for him to enter the restaurant if the people across the street could see them so well through the glass why couldn't he.

Posted at 12:32PM on Jun 24th 2009 by abraham

32. it's incredible.......

Posted at 12:33PM on Jun 24th 2009 by marco

33. it's inredible

Posted at 12:36PM on Jun 24th 2009 by marco

34. Did this guy get a good pic of her Big Toe Thumbs??-----

Posted at 12:45PM on Jun 24th 2009 by Steady Teddy

35. Dam camera is TOO Heavy.

Posted at 12:59PM on Jun 24th 2009 by shit N N get N

36. What's the difference TMZ, you were filming them through the WINDOW, just as bad, or worse, because you're spying on them while they're eating, and then have the nerve to call the other photog a D-bag? As you're so fond of saying: Pot, meet Kettle! Ha! But seriously, they did not have to sit in the window . They want the attention, because maybe they know their 15 minutes is ticking by.

Posted at 1:05PM on Jun 24th 2009 by Missing the point

37. Abrahama - there are flaws in your legal analysis. You can only be arrested for trespassing in a nonposted place if you refuse to leave after being told to leave. This pap was outisde the retaurant - owner had no right to confront him, security weenie had no right to accost him, he was in a public place breaking no law. Period.

Posted at 1:07PM on Jun 24th 2009 by Frank Davis

38. So this photographer is a d-bag? This is coming from TMZ??? hahahahaha --- If you have ever watch TMZ's show all the photogs to is harass celebs to get a reaction out of them. TMZ is so above going into a restaraunt to take someones picture. That is so much worse.
And what do these stupid celebs expect when they go out to eat. If they don't like it they can either move or get one of their chefs to make them dinner at home.

Posted at 2:00PM on Jun 24th 2009 by Chris H.

39. Physical detainment for trespassing by security guards? Unbelievable. You cannot be "physically" detained for shoplifting. Most stores have a clear "hands off" policy. Sounds like BS hype for a new BS movie.

Posted at 2:08PM on Jun 24th 2009 by natty

40. It is about time you guys refer to yourselves as D-bags.

Posted at 3:31PM on Jun 24th 2009 by DavidL

41. What a waste of police resources. Embarrassing.

Posted at 3:37PM on Jun 24th 2009 by huh

42. It kills me how over 50% of the people posting this article have something negative to say about either of these actors. If you don't like them, then stop posting about them and "maybe they'll go away". Idiots!!! Secondly, to the person who said they were "B list (if that)"... well, obviously you've been living in a cave seeing as how Transformers (2007) made $708,272,592 and this new Transformers made $22,252,304 in one night... How much do you make a night? A cool $80? Yea. Shut up and sit down!

Posted at 4:16PM on Jun 24th 2009 by MzJ

43. What was the point of going into the restaurant to take a picture? He wasn't going to get anything better than the paps who were outside.

Posted at 4:36PM on Jun 24th 2009 by Kate

44. Frank Davis -- my legal analysis is not wrong except probably in places in California where you can violate any law you want apparently -- the pap is INSIDE the restaurant at the time the pic is taken. Whatever. I do not have the energy to try to explain it too you.

Posted at 4:37PM on Jun 24th 2009 by abraham

45. WHATS TROUBLESOME ABOUT THIS IS THE MAN TAKING PICTURE DID NOTHING ILLEGAL BUT GRABBING A MAN IS ASSAULT AND THE BODYGUARD SHOULD BE PROSECUTED. IF YOU CHOSE TO BECOME A CELEB YOU CHOSE TO BECOME PUBLIC FODER FOR PHOTOS PERIOD WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT. IF YOU DONT LIKE IT DONT BE A CELEB- EASY AS THAT!

Posted at 4:59PM on Jun 24th 2009 by Kim

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments