John Edwards and the Baby -- Resemblance?

61. Pay up Edwards...ya cheatn' scumbag.

Posted at 4:11PM on Jun 25th 2009 by lovejac23

62. To be honest with you, I don't see the resemblance AT ALL, except that they both have blue eyes. She is a cutie though

Posted at 4:20PM on Jun 25th 2009 by you are NOT the father- Maury

63. same blue eyes, same nose, same mouth, same fair complexion, same shape of chin.. yep it's his.. don't need no DNA test..

Posted at 4:21PM on Jun 25th 2009 by star

64. WOULD Make them all look bad thus a LID...so maybe the kid one day will see how the covered her up all her life and hate them as theyre doing to her?.Truth is better than coverup lies but than again there is no love in a group of self centered liers so she will never know.Or if she get the DNA than she will see how they didn`t give a smit about her.

Posted at 4:22PM on Jun 25th 2009 by A bitch child?

65. Is everywhere today and is cheap.It`s his kid!But they think they are protecting her.He`s a rat-turd fake X`ian and she`ll keep her mouthy shut for the cash SOP pf the fake GOP

Posted at 4:27PM on Jun 25th 2009 by BIOmath softwear

66. BUT THAT BABY LOOKS LIKE THE OTHER GUY SHE ALSO LOOKS LIKE HER CRAZY WHORE MOTHER. BUT MORE LIKE THE GUY SHE WAS SEEING TOO THE SAME TIME SHE WAS MESSING WITH EDWARDS. SHE HAS THE SHAPE OF HIS HEAD, EYES AND NOSE.

Posted at 4:50PM on Jun 25th 2009 by NYCGAL

67. Alright....she has blue eyes...SO WHAT! Neither my husband nor his ex have blue eyes, but my stepson does...yet a paternity test proved that they're both the parents.
Sure, she could be his...but she could be not his. I don't think anyone should jump to any conclusions based on eye color alone, seeing as blue eyes are recessive!

Posted at 4:48PM on Jun 25th 2009 by StarryEve77

68. YOU CANT PUT ALL THE BLAME ON EDWARDS, THAT WHORE KNEW HE WAS MARRIED AND STILL WENT AFTER HIM. SO SHE IS MORE TO BLAME. SEEING 2 GUYS ATTHE SAME TIME. I THINK THEY BOTH SET IT UP TO EXORT MONEY FROM EDWARDS.

Posted at 4:55PM on Jun 25th 2009 by NYCGAL

69. Clinton with a teen and on and on it goes

Posted at 4:53PM on Jun 25th 2009 by sop OF gop

70. ~ No, I think the girl looks like Elizabeth ~ emphasis on her NOSE !!

Posted at 4:57PM on Jun 25th 2009 by ONALEE

71. I was so disappointed when this mess was revealed. I believe the baby is his, but I thinkshe is the spitting image of her mother.

Posted at 5:41PM on Jun 25th 2009 by Lilly

72. TOO BAD ABOUT HEREDITY GIVEN ..BOTH DONORS SEEM TO BE PATHETIC NARCISSISTIC LOSERS WITH A FAME ADDICTION THAT RENDERS THEM BRAIN DEAD....POOR KID ... HER BABY BOOK IS PROBABLY FILLED WITH PICTURES OF HER PARENTS...NOT A BABY BOOK TO BE PROUD OF.

Posted at 5:43PM on Jun 25th 2009 by ZIEGUZEUNT

73. Just because she's got blue eyes doesn't make it his baby.Why would he deny it, now that the whole world knows of the affair. It probably isn't hisl.

Posted at 6:31PM on Jun 25th 2009 by Esmeralda

74. Ridiculous, the eyes are like her mother's eyes in color, shape, and size. The nose is a classic baby nose, impossible to tell until the child gets older. The mouth does not look like Edwards.

Interesting the skank keeps putting out these pictures. Wonder how many she has to take to get the "good" picture of herself to send to all the media. Disgusting excuse of a female.

Edwards screwed up, big time, and should make amends to his family for the rest of his life. He was fooled by a con artist; only difference in a hooker and a golddigger is the golddigger is a little smarter. But, RielleFortuneHunter should be looking elsewhere for her meal ticket, or, heaven forbid, get a real job for the first time in her life. How could this cooze let so many lives get destroyed, even her own child. Karma is gonna get you Rielle.

Posted at 6:15PM on Jun 25th 2009 by RielleFortuneHunter

75. Some of you twits watch way too much Maury. Doesn't matter what the kid looks like. John should not shell out one single solitary thin dime to this woman until she gets off her butt and agrees to a DNA test. See all you people bashing him for what he did, something many men have done since the dawn of time and will continue to do, but you keep forgetting that this child's mother has REFUSED and continues to refuse to submit to a DNA test. If she is SOOOO sure the child is his why not have the test done and be over with?

John has never ONCE refused to submit for DNA testing, she has. Why? Because she's the one who stands to loose out if she does. The baby's not his? Well then she goes back to being just the other woman who also LIED about the father of her child. As long as she holds back she can go about claiming to be the mother of his child.

Posted at 7:36PM on Jun 25th 2009 by Kris