Jackson Family Will Fight Rowe Tooth and Nail

Michael Jackson's family will wage an epic battle to make sure Paris and Michael Jr. do not end up in the custody of one Debbie Rowe -- this according to family members who spoke with TMZ.

The family is currently gathered together and they are reacting to our story this morning that Rowe never legally gave up her custody rights. Under California law, Rowe is in a position to get custody of her biological kids if she wants them, provided it would not be detrimental to the children.

The family complained to us the kids don't even know Debbie Rowe -- she hasn't been a part of their lives. They say the kids must remain "within the family."



Tags: custody battle, custody fight, CustodyBattle, CustodyFight, debbie rowe, DebbieRowe, michael jackson, MichaelJackson

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 4 of 28) Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

46. She didn't care to know them while MJ was alive....what on earth makes you people think she'll be fit to be their mother now...that's insane. What mother in their RIGHT mind would just give you their kids iin lieu of money AND not be apart of their life in some fashion outside of a courtroom. That's bullcrap. Just because they came out of your vagina...doesn't mean you are fit to be a mother...just as if you contributed the sperm..doesn't mean you are fit to be a father. If this was the other way around....no way would some of you condone these kids be given to their father that just so happens to "pop" up. crazy...

Posted at 7:01PM on Jun 26th 2009 by ATLchicka

47. Get real, does it really matter who they live with at this point? Those kids are scarred for life -- forced to wear veils and act like freaks, how could they EVER turn out "normal"?

Posted at 7:02PM on Jun 26th 2009 by Ho

48. Custody should go to the person who'll raise these children with some sence of a "NORMAL LIFE". Let them at least have some sence of a "CHILDHOOD" so they can "GROW UP" and be "ADULTS" in adult bodies! No more glorified excusses!

Posted at 3:48PM on Jun 28th 2009 by Konkijayne

49. Poster #22? When did she state that?


SURELY HE HAD A LIVING WILL....and all parties involved would respect it.

Posted at 7:11PM on Jun 26th 2009 by jamie

50. I think that it's the judges decision but I belive janet or michaels brothers should get the kids or sum1 who was close to jackson and the kids like. I mean it REALLY SHOULD BE UP TO THE KIDS.why give sum1 the kids when they were never really in their life. She lost riights riight?? well there u go it should stick and they should go to who the kids want to go to. I think janet would make a good mom....she should take em in.

Posted at 7:07PM on Jun 26th 2009 by Kristin Ryszykow

51. THAT IS UTTERLY RIDICULOUS !! LOOK HOW THE JACKSON KIDS TURNED OUT AND MICHAEL HIM SELF !! LET DEBBIE HAVE HER KIDS !! THEM KIDS HAVE BEEN THRU ENOUGH OF THE WEIRDNESS OF MJ'S LIFE !! HIDING BEHIND MASKS AND COVERING THERE FACES AND CAN'T GO NOWHERE? WHAT THE HELL KIND OF LIFE IS THAT FOR THEM KIDS? AND THEN JOE JACKSON? ABUSING THEM LIKE HE DID HIS OWN KIDS? HELL NO !!!!! I WOULD RATHER SEE THEM GO TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THEN TO THE JACKSON CLAN !!!!

Posted at 7:02PM on Jun 26th 2009 by indiegal1

52. Are they even Debbie Rowe's children? I read comments on an earlier TMZ report that made me think. Many said how she was unattached emotionally to the children. Perhaps she was just a carrier to the donated eggs and sperm. Perhaps Michael wasn't as crazy as we all think. If he had any sense at all, he would've made her just the carrier, not the donor. I believe that these kids shold remain w/ the Jacksons and maybe have visitation if that is what court decides is in the best interest of the children. They may first want to find out if these children are in fact Debbe Rowe's. I would order DNA tests and that would rule out her chances of trying to get money if they aren't hers. Biologically or not, they were his kids. He had them since they were born and he was his dad.

Posted at 7:03PM on Jun 26th 2009 by Renea

53. I dont think Debbie Rowe should get her kids.If You are a real mother You see your kids.Michaels family should get them,Debbie just wants the money not the kids..

Posted at 7:03PM on Jun 26th 2009 by Vegasgrl

54. she should not get them. she just want money!

Posted at 7:03PM on Jun 26th 2009 by Abdul

55. Michael himself said his father was a child abuser, why in gods name would he want his children with this man, if his mother did not protect her own children from their father why would she protect her grandchildren, they need to be placed in a home where they will be safe, if that is with their mother so be it.

Posted at 7:08PM on Jun 26th 2009 by Mandy

56. She has not even said she wants the children, but if she did I think through DNA she could prove they are not even his. Unless you are blind those children are caucasian .

Posted at 7:03PM on Jun 26th 2009 by cmk

57. Wow, Debbie Rowe or the Jackson cult, which could be worse? Those children will truly be messed up living under those strict and unrelenting JW doctrines.

Posted at 7:22PM on Jun 26th 2009 by Debra in Orlando

58. And if they remain with the "Jackson Family", they too will grow up to be F'D UP......A GROUP OF WEIRDOS....

Posted at 7:04PM on Jun 26th 2009 by Lisa M-Centereach

59. Janet's biological clock has about run out and it doesn't look like she and Mini Me are ever going to tie the knot, if I were her I would try to fight for custody of those kids. Debbie Rowe gave her kids away, legally or not, she should leave them alone.

Posted at 12:09PM on Jun 27th 2009 by JoeP

60. Are they really Michael Jackson's Kids?

Did he really give his semen to have the kids?

Does that eally count if it's not?

Posted at 7:07PM on Jun 26th 2009 by Are they really Michael Jackson's Kids?

Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments