Jackson's Last Place of Residence

Michael Jackson was living in this Holmby Hills Mansion with his three children at the time of his death.

Michael Jackson Mansion

Jackson was renting the luxury home for $100,000 a month.

Tags: house, mansion, michael jackson, MichaelJackson

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 3) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. It`s cheaper to rent than own in the L.A area, and houseprices are going down-so renting is the smart thing to do.

Neverland cost him 1 million/month, so this was a steal in comparison.

Posted at 11:54AM on Jun 28th 2009 by akatheking

17. I agree with #2!
This is a beautiful house-the price just went up on it!
Obviously someone wanted Michael to continue to live in a lifestyle he was accustomed to-and he still got/gets royalties and had his concerts coming up-
He could have written a book or anything else and would have made $-
Jackson was a (Golden Goose)-when he put his mind to it!
P.S. I am broke and live in a one bedroom-and ride a bus for transportation-(I don't hate Jackson for living a wealthy
lifestyle-(#3/#4/#9)-the irony is there isn't it?- In the end he couldn't take it with him!
#2/#13 hang in there, hope you get it-you certainly have good taste!

Posted at 5:38PM on Jun 27th 2009 by What the Hell?

18. HEY ASHLEEEEEE OR IS IT ASSLEEEEEEEEEE? GROW UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 7:24PM on Jun 27th 2009 by Joe Jackson screwed up Michael

19. For someone who enjoyed acting like a kid and indeed was raising 3 children in this house how come it looks soooo much like a museum ? Does not look to me as a place were kids could be kids...just sayin'

Posted at 7:29PM on Jun 27th 2009 by Morgan

20. Is this home not located near the Playboy Mansion?

Posted at 7:47PM on Jun 27th 2009 by Pablo

21. not to shabby.

Posted at 7:51PM on Jun 27th 2009 by nooo

22. I agree with the person who said this was "slumming". I get their point. If he was so destitute why is he in a home of such magnitude? Is this considered the slum's of Hollywoods broke? Regardless of who was paying for it, I find it troubling that this is downsizing when one is supposedly on the verge of 400 plus million in debt. I think most Americans would love to downsize to that dont you?

Posted at 8:10PM on Jun 27th 2009 by whatever

23. A MUST READ:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1196009/Im-better-dead-Im-How-Michael-Jackson-predicted-death-months-ago.html

If this is true, my heart breaks for Michael.

Posted at 1:42AM on Jun 28th 2009 by Hope

24. Not bad for someone who claimed they were broke

Posted at 10:20AM on Jun 28th 2009 by squiddy

25. Even a beautiful mansion like that in a posh neighborhood--$100,000/mo??? Typical annual rent is 15% the price of the house. This would value this house at $8 million. Clearly MJ didn't get much of a discount.

Posted at 1:59AM on Jun 28th 2009 by B. Mull

26. Your #1 fan. I love you Michael! Musical icon!

Posted at 2:02AM on Jun 28th 2009 by Luvenia

27. this is crazy everyone on this site talking about his money problems that doesnt matter let that man rest in peace i mean what is the big deal half of you dont make a $100,000 in a year or maybe in a lifetime. Focus on the joy that he brought millions not on if he was struggling are not. I mean its ignorate to entertain by saying crazy things and not get paid for it at all. Lets be grown bout this.........

Posted at 4:17AM on Jun 29th 2009 by juke

28. The home, or estate is more like it, is owned by Sean Connery. Yes, Pablo, it's near the Playboy Mansion.

Posted at 4:20PM on Jun 28th 2009 by Juju

29. THIS " MANSION " LOOKS AS SAME AS A HUGE TOMB , IN FACT , IT IS .

Posted at 10:25AM on Jun 28th 2009 by A TREE

30. actually rent goes up in a recession. House prices plummet. Now is the time to buy for a deal, not rent.

Posted at 3:34PM on Jun 28th 2009 by whatever

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments