Michael Jackson's Demerol Tonic

Michael JacksonMichael Jackson had a habit of getting Demerol injections -- he even had a special name for them.

We're told Jackson called it "health tonic." He would have a doctor inject him because, we're told, he didn't like needles.

Our sources have told us Jackson was injected with Demerol at 11:30 AM the day he died. Shortly thereafter Jackson went into cardiac arrest.

You'll recall, Jackson also had a name for wine -- Jesus juice.



Tags: cardiac arrest, CardiacArrest, demerol, died, drugs, health tonic, HealthTonic, michael jackson, MichaelJackson

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 21 of 21) Previous 15 Comments

301. number 298. a.g. ....Okay, first of all I don't think Debbie should get those kids, because SHE SOLD THEM TO MICHAEL JACKSON. I am not saying he was a pedophile, but there were allegations. So, what mother would knowingly leave her kids alone with someone that had been accused not once, but twice of pedophilia? Even if it isn't true, would you take a chance with your kids if you cared anything at all about them? Not only did she leave her kids alone with him (if they are in fact even her kids, just because she gave birth to them doesn't mean she is their bio mom or make her a mother in any way shape or form). I think it is ironic that Debbie has suddenly had a change of heart since MJ's death, I think it is more likely like you said, she is trying to get more money. She certainly isn't trying to protect her kids. However, I don't think Debbie was just using Michael, I think they used each other. He wanted children so he used her to get them and she used him to get money. I can't understand why he married her though, I mean he was married to Lisa Marie for goodness sakes, look at her and then look at Debbie. Maybe, making MJ marry her was her insurance plan to make sure she got money out of him after the kids were born? IDK, but I think it is so weird that MJ would marry her. However, this may of been one of the only women he could get to carry kids for him to raise by himself? If MJ is not the real father of the kids, then I also think whoever is their biological father shouldn't have rights to the kids either, I mean can you imagine having someone donate sperm/egg and then when you die they come around wanting your child? That is just insane. At the same time it does make u think twice about donating sperm/egg because what if a pedophile ends up with ur biological children to raise. (Not saying MJ was, but we don't know for sure) I do not think Debbie killed Michael. It does appear that Michael was a good father, at least according to his own daughter and for those kids sakes I hope he was. They (the kids) seem heartbroken and now they don't even know who is gonna raise them. It's just sad and on top of that, they are finding out that MJ may not be their biological father and that Debbie may not even be their biological mother either. Then on top of that, those kids will grow up reading terrible things in the tabloids and on the internet about their father. Was he a pedophile? I don't know, but I really hope not...If he were just some average person then I'd say probably so because what would anyone have to gain by accusing him, but since he is MJ and rich and famous then it is possible the boys were trying to get money, but it is also possible they were really telling the truth, I guess we will never know.....If he was a pedophile was he a good father? I think so and I hope so!.There are a lot of pedophiles that are good parents to their own children and only abuse others children and then their are parents that abuse their own children too. There are so many arguments that could be made like some say he wanted kids that weren't biologically his own to molest so he brokered a deal with Debbie to have kids and make the media think they were his own. I don't believe that at all. I think he wanted children of his own and maybe he couldn't biologically have kids so he then got Debbie to carry the kids? I know the kids don't look mixed, they look white so I am guessing MJ is not their bio father. On the other hand, I don't think MJ's mom should be raising the kids at her age either. Why doesn't one of his (MJ's siblings) take the kids? During his funeral the little girl was glued to Janet's side, so why doesn't she adopt them? At least that way you would know she wasn't after the money because she has her own money. I do not think Joe Jackson should help raise the kids at all, it has been proven that he wasn't a good father to his kids and pushed them into the entertainment industry to make money off of them when they were just babies. So, I'm afraid that if MJ's mom get's the kids that Joe will have a part in raising them and since MJ's mom didn't stand up to Joe when it came to her own kids then I doubt she'd stand up to him when it comes to MJ's kids. I do think the kids should be left with family, MJ's family to be exact, but not really his mother and father because 1. their age 2. because of how Joe Jackson is. However, I do think one of his siblings should raise the kids. To me it looks like MJ would of left the kids to one of his brothers or sisters, it would of been a smarter choice on his part. Diana Ross is 65 years old and that is also kind of old to be raising young children. Any of his brothers/sisters are younger than Diana Ross so they seem like the logical choice? Janet is only in her early 40's and I thought her and MJ were pretty close, it looks like she'd be the obvious choice? Macauly Culkin is the oldest children's god parent so I thought godparents usually take the kids to raise and since Liz Taylor is the other god parent then she's too old. However, Macauly is still so young himself I doubt he'd want to be tied down with kids when he don't have any of his own yet. I just hope the kids end up with family and not in foster care and I hope they get to stay together and not 2 raised by one person and the other raised by someone else. This is just a sad sad thing. You would think after someone dies that people would stop talking about them in a negative light, but that's never the case. I remember when Heath Ledger died, just because he'd done Broke back Mountain, that people were saying he was gay and all kinds of terrible things after he died. I think when someone that dies has children, especially young children, you shouldn't be saying things about that person that could later on be read by their children. You shouldn't be saying bad things about anyone that has died because those kinds of things will come back to haunt you later on. MJ is no longer hear to hear people's ridicule, the only people that can see it are his family, children, friends ect. and why put them through more grief than they are already going through. I don't care what kind of person it was that died, I would never say I was glad they were dead or anything terrible about them because those people do have a family that are hurting. Plus, one day it may be you in the same situation and you wouldn't want anyone saying that kind of thing about your child, brother, sister, mother, father ect. Only God can judge Michael Jackson now and only his judgment counts. If MJ was a pedophile I am sure he is having to answer to God for it, if he was wrongly accused then God knows that too.

Posted at 10:33AM on Jul 10th 2009 by BNM

302. soy fan numero uno de michael jackson

Posted at 6:41PM on Aug 21st 2009 by glenda

303. TMZ, when I don't think you can get in lower, you prove me wrong!

Posted at 4:18PM on Aug 28th 2009 by NicoleSann

Previous 15 Comments