Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents

We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb.

Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie's eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.

In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we're told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the "receiving parent" -- Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael.

We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were.

Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it's not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there's a presumption that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence.

We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it's still an open issue with the courts.



Michael Jackson's kids

Tags: biological, custody, debbie rowe, DebbieRowe, fertilization, in vitro, InVitro, kids, michael jackson, MichaelJackson, prince michael II, Prince michael jr., PrinceMichaelIi, PrinceMichaelJr., surrogate

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 72) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. Rubbish, the 2 eldest are the spitting image of Rowe, and little Prince Michael II is the spitting image of Jackson. So this exclusive is absolute bollocks.

Posted at 10:17AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Holly

17. Those are MJ's children- it does not matter how he came about them. Lets talk about Madonna buying up all the little children in Africa...

Posted at 10:22AM on Jun 30th 2009 by LadyLeo

18. LOOK AT HAT BIG, FAT, DISGUSTING, BEAST DEBBIE ROWE!

Posted at 10:20AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Harvey Lee Roth

19. Well, duh!

Did anyone actually believe that Jackson was these kids' biological father???? May have had procedures and plastic surgery to make himself white, but his genes would have still been African-American. Those children are NOT bi-racial...they are white.

Posted at 10:19AM on Jun 30th 2009 by CherokeeChick

20. I DA PAPPY!!!
hehehe

Posted at 10:27AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Tony

21. Are you KIDDING? Have you seen the kids? They look just like Debbie and Michael!

You people just love to publish those photos of them looking so white. What about a picture of Paris, no flash, no tweaking, with her olive skin? And Blanket? God...

You know what: even if Michael wasn't their biological father, he was a father in every other way. It doesn't take much to be a "dad", but it's much more to be "daddy".

Posted at 12:46AM on Jul 1st 2009 by Vanessa

22. to number #4 Actually the son is the spitting image of Tito Jackson's children. He looks just like his cousins- you can see the Jackson features in MJ's son

Posted at 10:20AM on Jun 30th 2009 by LadyLeo

23. JANET RIPPED OFF OUR FROZEN SPERM and wiped it all over her tITS and sold some to MJ can we see those tits again?

Posted at 10:21AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Howard Hughes ESTATE KEEPER

24. He didn't want Black kids and didn't want to pass on his genetic immune systems... he did choose the sperm donor... he didn't want any genetic link to his father Joe. He hated the way Joe looked and the way Joe's kids had strong resemblance to him.

Posted at 10:20AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Knew it

25. Oh damn, who knows, it COULD might actually be true, hasnt anyone thought to themselves howcomes his children were so white, red cheeks n all? Not even a look of mixed complexion in them...
Well who really knows for sure...

Posted at 10:21AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Andrey

26. Fake story people...MJ is the father and crazy @@@ debbie is the mother..

Posted at 10:22AM on Jun 30th 2009 by rosa112

27. What's the difference between Joe Jackson and an 8 year old boy at Neverland Ranch?
One got screwed out of the will and one got screwed against their will.

Posted at 10:21AM on Jun 30th 2009 by !

28. OMG...is this really true??? I don't get it...I can understand him not wanting to actually get his wife pregnant the "old fashion way" if that wasn't his preference...BUT WHY NOT JUST DONATE YOUR OWN SPERM??? I honestly don't get it...I am a huge MJ fan, but I'm really confused!

Whoever the parents may be....PLEASE DON'T LET JOE JACKSON GET THESE KIDS!!! He's already abused more than his share!!!

Posted at 10:22AM on Jun 30th 2009 by me

29.
Yep the kid$ look just like Rowe. The stories get better everyday... I want the right$ to the movie and tv drama series...

Hope the kid$ are getting an education! Being the King-Of-Pop kid$ shouldn't deny you the right to being educated by a decent in-home teacher...

Posted at 10:22AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Billy Jean

30. I certainly hope THERE IS PROOF to back this story up. If not, TMZ and other gossipers can add their name to being SUED by the Jackson estate. I ADORE the Jackson 5 and Michael Jackson. I certainly hope this nonsense is not true. If it is, those kids will need all the money they can get for psychiatrist bills. Dang, why not just adopt three babies or get some kids out of the foster care system. I will wait until I see PROOF.

Posted at 10:26AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Be London

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments