Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents

We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb.

Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie's eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.

In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we're told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the "receiving parent" -- Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael.

We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were.

Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it's not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there's a presumption that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence.

We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it's still an open issue with the courts.



Michael Jackson's kids

Tags: biological, custody, debbie rowe, DebbieRowe, fertilization, in vitro, InVitro, kids, michael jackson, MichaelJackson, prince michael II, Prince michael jr., PrinceMichaelIi, PrinceMichaelJr., surrogate

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 72) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. The little girl does look a lot like Debbie

Posted at 10:22AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Laurie

32. I'm not really sure if I am buying this. Sure, the kids are very light skinned (which is not unusual in biracial children), but they do bare a resemblance to Mike. I'll be so glad when all this speculation and false info is replaced with the truth.

Posted at 10:35AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Dangerous Lee

33. Rowe won't go after kids... that's inevitability was taken car5e of by Jackson.
And ... does anyone think MJ would have sex with Debbie Rowe? Puh...lease...

He wouldn't touch her with a ten foot pole...


PS
MJ was asexual

Posted at 10:23AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Knew it

34. Yes Micheal Jackson is dead so lets leave his family along to morn their loss, and try to report happier news. Because all of this publicity is only hurting his family and children.

Posted at 10:23AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Tonya

35. Yeah this rumor has already been shot down... it's completely FALSE...

Posted at 10:25AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Jdizzy

36. PLEASE stop it they are his kids.Are you going to say they are and Brad and Angelina kids too.It's such a double standard if Michael does it ,it's weird but if someone else does it their a saint.check yourselves people please.

Posted at 10:25AM on Jun 30th 2009 by deedee3

37. I DA PAPPY!!!

Posted at 10:25AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Tony

38. This is a bogus report just like the one yesterday. Those kids are not Michael's biological kids, but the older two are definately Debbie's .They look just like her! If she's not the biological mom then someone in her family is....

Posted at 10:25AM on Jun 30th 2009 by ohiomom

39. To all those who still use the word 'bleeching' in any of MJ's life, CHECK YOUR DAMN SOURCES, go check 'vitiligo michael jackson' and you'll see so many pictures of him losing his dark color...
so any of these kids could be his, born caucasian just like Rashida Jones or Mariah Carey... we can't tell this untill they've proves of dna samples...and even then...why bother? MJ to them was there father and if they were made with donated sperm, than all of this was LEGAL and not FREAKY as some of u say...

God I feel really sad reading all this stuff, give it a rest...

Posted at 10:27AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Maya

40. DUH people. He didn't want his love stick in a woman, do you honestly believe he would have his sperm in a woman?? The only way MJ would ever have fathered a child, is if they found a way to let little boys concieve and carry them.

Posted at 10:26AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Still Funny

41. He even talked about it in the interviews...He died from SLE that he lived with since 1986

Posted at 10:28AM on Jun 30th 2009 by He CHOSE the BIO parents,he died from SLE

42. Paris looks just like Debbie Rowe. Look at her facial features. I don't buy this story.

Posted at 10:28AM on Jun 30th 2009 by SB Mom

43. My question is: Was he impotent? It's a common desease...

Posted at 10:32AM on Jun 30th 2009 by lillymarlen

44. Shame on you Rowe!

Posted at 10:31AM on Jun 30th 2009 by kaLoo

45. even if they arent biologically his kids whats the difference? people adopt children or do surrogate arrangements all the time. just cuz its mj people freak out. theres nothing weird about wanting children and if you cant personally have them finding someone who can for you. let it be

Posted at 10:30AM on Jun 30th 2009 by Sammie

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments