Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents

We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb.

Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie's eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.

In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we're told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the "receiving parent" -- Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael.

We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were.

Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it's not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there's a presumption that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence.

We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it's still an open issue with the courts.



Michael Jackson's kids

Tags: biological, custody, debbie rowe, DebbieRowe, fertilization, in vitro, InVitro, kids, michael jackson, MichaelJackson, prince michael II, Prince michael jr., PrinceMichaelIi, PrinceMichaelJr., surrogate

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 72 of 72) Previous 15 Comments

1066. Micheal was smart in that there is almost zero chance of ever knowing who the parents are to those kids and thus he protects the Jackson Family Trust. That is what it is about here folks, MONEY.

So Michael leaves the world a puzzle, unless we solve the mystery we the world will never know who there rightful parents are anymore than the actual rightful parents, the children actual.

Smart thinking Michael! But doesn't it still hurt the children ? I suppose as long as they are cared and loved for everything will work itself out.

Posted at 2:00PM on Jul 17th 2009 by Tom Smythe

1067. i think the youngest one may be his, but none look like debbie rowe at all, even after her make over, it is quite possible that Micheal had designer babies made for the first two, whites have had black looking babies and vise versa before including twins with one white and one black looking since the beginning of time.
One thing is for sure, Mike was a stay at home dad, and appears to have been a very good one, with the exceptions of his late night sleep over with little boys, giving wine to little boys, both which he believe was okay and everybody should do it, crazy spending$$$, and his many books and pictures of naked little boys.
I wonder if the real mothers and Dads will find out and seek custody and MJ 2 billion dollar music catalog which will be worth more every year.

Posted at 8:06PM on Jul 17th 2009 by Dave

1068. i wish the best for his kids, and the truth to come out about his reallife in the future both good and bad to help others, in the end it is god who will be the judge, not us, he will judge us too, particially on how we judge and talk about others, including mj, i do hope he made peace with god, only he knows, for we all are all sinners and have faults , and only god knows the circumstances and can forgive us if we truly repent, I hope to see mike in heaven one day. hope i was not to mean in my previos comment but that is what they reported during the trial and some of the things he actually said.
peace and love to all

Posted at 3:30PM on Jul 18th 2009 by Dave

1069. i think the kids arent his i think she an micheal struck a deal because she loved micheal an he didnt love her he wonted kids an she gave them to him yea i believe they are hers but not his because he didnt wont to pass his sickness to his children so she went to the doc to get preganted but she doesnt wont to have anything to do with the kids maybe there not hers i think she wonted to be with micheal an he didnt love her an didnt know how to be a husband because he was a man child an never grow up an she reliezed she couldnt live that way but couldnt take the kids away from him so she done all she could do but leave them with him but she made a mistake doing that an he got the last child over seas an he will never know who he is but they were micheals kids he loved them an they loved him an his family i hope the kids stay with the jackson because thats all they knew

Posted at 11:40AM on Jul 19th 2009 by diane

1070. What the hell is that? Is Michael destined to suffer all these ridiculous rumors just because he is black? Why don't you try to accept what he said instead of those absurd sayings? Why don't you try to believe that maybe innocent love did use to exist in these planet?
He brought the best music and love to our world, but what did he receive?
Michael is ruined by racists and ghost sof jealousy, who set him up again and again and again, until the moment he died!!!
At least try to know someone before you make a judgement. If you can't do that, there's a simple thing you can do, which is shutting your mouth up!!!

Posted at 1:28AM on Jul 21st 2009 by MJ

1071. Let me tell you why. If Michael were white singer as Elvis Presley, he wouldn't have suffered all this absurdest things in the world.

Posted at 1:33AM on Jul 21st 2009 by MJ

1072. He's already died. What more you guys want from him? Haven't you taken enough from him when he was alive?

Posted at 1:49AM on Jul 21st 2009 by MJ4EVER

1073. I agree with people that see Michael's eyes and expression in Prince II.. I think they are his biological kids!!!

Posted at 9:51AM on Jul 21st 2009 by MARZIA

1074. as it was said she was paid very well for this so she was paid for that so she needs to go on with her life and leave the jacksons alone and let them deal with it and and let be known she not taking these children cause she been paid for her services she done her job so thats not not going to be a mom ever,she here quickly for money !!!!!!!!!! needing money cant spend money well told before she spend on her dogs $35.000 come on . and she was probaly getting low on money by now. the kids love the one aunt and even the grandma so thats where they need to be they have been tore up enough and i think the court should see this and let the kids be heard cause they are never heared and thats what happenened in alot of cases not heared they arent happy and then problems so let them be heard more then fair. and they love where they are so leave them alone and let them adjust what they just went threw and live with the ones that can them get threw from now on in life. to be what they want to be not what anyone else wants them to be but what they want to be. the one aunt sounds great. not in public eyes thats what they need. normal life. even with rowe not a normal life with her she in public eye alot. and has got paid for her services what do you think the kids are going to think about her then i know what i would think and now their dadis gone she jumps in and not around much before wants more money and they are being used for that. all that should not be hard to figured out.

Posted at 5:30PM on Jul 23rd 2009 by jerri

1075. How stupid can the tabloids be?
Joe Jackson is part white part indian and he has greenish-blue eyes.
So, what's the problem if Paris has blue eyes? It's a Genetic thing.
They are MJ's children.

Posted at 6:50AM on Jul 24th 2009 by Amsilvestre

1076. How can u say hes not the biological father if his first son prince has vitiligo on his right hand??

Posted at 3:49AM on Jul 25th 2009 by Abdu

1077. For those of you who don't realize tht black people can have children that look white, get a clue. Bi-racial kids can look all white, all black or both. Look at Victoria Rowell from te Young and the Restless. Her child has blonde hair and blue eyes. Wentworth Miller, Jennifer Beals(flashdance),Maya Rudolph(Saturday Night Live). Not to mention that I have numerous bi-racial family members. CHECK YOURFACT AND TAKE A BIOLOGY CLASS FIRST DUMBAZZZZ!

Posted at 6:46PM on Aug 10th 2009 by getwiththeprogram

1078. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4uiPHtMSpM

it doesn't matter if they're the parents or not. i think they are. (just my opinion) but maybe the link above will make you re-think. not saying its true or whatever but i think people should keep an open mind and not be so quick to judge. its really none of our business anyway but i just thought I'd point this out. Also, it is completely possible to be part black and look white. what are bi-racial kids "supposed" to look like? my brother is black and white and he looks only white, so lets not be ignorant here.

Posted at 4:55PM on Aug 20th 2009 by lauren

1079. That is BS and everyone knows it...The kids may not be biologically Michaels, but he is their father...end of story...If you dont think its possible for a black man to have light skinned/white children, look at this pic of Tiger Woods and his new baby.I dont seen anyone denying that he is the father, and that baby is WHITE! SEE BELOW: http://www.golf.com/golf/gallery/article/0,28242,1636961-3,00.html

Paris Michael looks EXACTLY like Debbie Rowe, so get your facts straight...TMZ, you should know better! You arent the National Enquirer now are you?

Posted at 3:08PM on Aug 25th 2009 by Melissa Garrison

1080. all that stuff doesnt matter by law Michael was and is their father

Posted at 4:38PM on Sep 12th 2009 by Lou Noel

Previous 15 Comments