Home : Michael Jackson : Prince II's Birth Certificate -- No Mother Listed

Prince II's Birth Certificate -- No Mother Listed

Posted Jun 30th 2009 8:00AM by TMZ Staff

We've obtained the birth certificate for Michael Jackson's youngest son -- which only lists the kid as having one parent ... Michael Jackson.

Michael Jackson's son Click to view!

On the doc, Prince Michael Jackson II's father is listed as MJ -- but the space where Prince's mother is supposed to be named was left blank.

As we reported earlier this morning, Michael is not the biological father of his three children. In Prince Michael's case, the surrogate never knew she was carrying Michael's baby -- who was conceived in vitro.

And this is interesting ... Katherine Jackson apparently doesn't know Prince Michael's date of birth. Yesterday, in the guardianship papers, she listed his DOB as 1/21/02. The birth certificate says he was born on 2/21/02, one month later.

See Also



Tags: birth certificate, BirthCertificate, katherine jackson, KatherineJackson, michael jackson, michael jackson death, michael jacksons son, MichaelJackson, MichaelJacksonDeath, MichaelJacksonsSon

Comments [114]
SHARE |
4ie6

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 8) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. I love Madonna

Posted at 12:54PM on Jun 30th 2009 by angellovef

17. Prince II, as well as Paris, and Prince I, are not Michael's biological children. He did not use his sperm for any of them. You fans are in denial.

Posted at 12:56PM on Jun 30th 2009 by sachet

18. Micheal jackson was pushed beyond belief to be a successful performer. His dad pushed him and the other Jacksons from the time he was a child. I am sorry for Joe jackson losing his son. But I remember that friends of the jackson family used to say on talk shows that when the Jackson practiced , Joe jackson would beat them if they messed up . , those poor kids. No wonder Micheal had so many problems.

Posted at 12:57PM on Jun 30th 2009 by Jane

19. Just do a DNA test and get the facts!!

Posted at 12:56PM on Jun 30th 2009 by hazenyc

20. Something is very wrong with this story about Michael not being the biological father to these kids.
I just got finished looking at the pictures that are in the other story about Michael and Debbie not being the biological parents.
People keep saying that those kids are all white...they ARE NOT!
Well, if anyone clicks onto picture #45 you can see that Prince Michael II does have BLACK in him.
Look how brown his hands are.
As for the two oldest kids, I find it mighty starnge that when they show images of them on television the appear to look bi-racial, but on pictures on websites thier skin looks much lighter.
I think that these sleazy websites are doctoring these kids photo's for the sensationalism of generating a scandulous story.
None of anything matters though because all 3 of these children thought of Michael as being thier daddy and no amount of dna, tabloids, lies, assumptions, ect, will change anything at the end of the day.
Michael is and will always be the father of these precious innocent kids, even if only in their hearts and not by dna.

Posted at 12:59PM on Jun 30th 2009 by Just Sayin...

21. If M.J is on the birth certificate shouldn't he automatically recieve custodial rights to the child(ren)?

Posted at 1:03PM on Jun 30th 2009 by TJ

22. What a way to seriously devastate 2 children's lives even further right after they lost their father - have them find out online that their father isn't their biological father. I hope you all had the decency to at least notify the family that you were "running" with this story. Who cares who you destroy in your quest for the "truth" that really doesn't need to be known.

Posted at 1:03PM on Jun 30th 2009 by Miss Baltimore Crabs

23. It a shame these kids will never know who they really are and they probably will grow up with major identity issues. Who knows what kind of lives they have lived up to know.

Posted at 1:04PM on Jun 30th 2009 by Jo

24. (1) Why would anyone need to file legal adoption papers if they are listed as "Father" on the birth certificate?

(2) Does California not include a "Race" category on their birth certificate forms? (I couldn't find it.)

Posted at 1:15PM on Jun 30th 2009 by ymbt

25. Something is very wrong with this story about Michael not being the biological father to these kids.
I just got finished looking at the pictures that are in the other story about Michael and Debbie not being the biological parents.
People keep saying that those kids are all white...they ARE NOT!
Well, if anyone clicks onto picture #45 you can see that Prince Michael II does have BLACK in him.
Look how brown his hands are.
As for the two oldest kids, I find it mighty strange that when they show images of them on television they appear to look bi-racial, but on pictures on websites thier skin looks much lighter.
I think that these sleazy websites are doctoring these kids photo's for the sensationalism of generating a scandulous story.
None of anything matters though because all 3 of these children thought of Michael as being thier daddy and no amount of dna, tabloids, lies, assumptions, ect, will change anything at the end of the day.
Michael is and will always be the father of these precious innocent kids, even if only in their hearts and not by dna.
And one last thing...BOTH of his sons look like him in some sort of way, especially the youngest boy.
And no they dont look like the "new" Michael...they favor the "original" Michael!!

Posted at 1:06PM on Jun 30th 2009 by Just Sayin...

26. Katherine is distraught. Putting the wrong number down doesn't mean she doesn't know what the child's birth date is. It means she's going through a lot and has a lot to do right now and is likley going to make some clerical errors, just like the rest of us sometimes.

Posted at 1:07PM on Jun 30th 2009 by WouldYouKnowIt

27. Anyone notice Michael's birthdate on the certificate? It says 8/29/58. His birthdate was 8/29/59.

Hmmm.... -Steve

Posted at 1:08PM on Jun 30th 2009 by MJFan4LIFE

28. my bad, so much goin' on I wasn't thinkin'. I don't know why I was thinkin' he was born in 59... -Steve

Posted at 1:12PM on Jun 30th 2009 by MJFan4LIFE

29. Paris looks just like Debbie!!

Posted at 1:14PM on Jun 30th 2009 by Bex

30. TMZ...PULL THIS STORY. How dare you step into this child's life. Levin...rein in your people . THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS.

Posted at 1:15PM on Jun 30th 2009 by TMZ, NOW YOU ARE GOING AFTER CHILDREN?

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments