Debbie Rowe to Fight for Custody

991. No she does not desere them... :(

Posted at 1:37AM on Jul 14th 2009 by wyat

992. Debbie Rowe "wants" "her" kids?? Is she kidding? A REAL mother does not sell her eggs and rent her womb, then hand over the resulting product to someone else for a price and walk away--let alone TWICE!!!! Hmmm...sounds like selling cattle to the best buyer. Debbie Rowe told the entire world time and again, starting with the birth of the first 12 years ago, that these were MJs kids. Her actions and her words over the years proved this time and again. She was paid handsomely for her services and should continue to walk on. She's a big girl. She knew the consequences. Why change anything now? She still has no real emotional or loving connection to the children and vice versa. MJ was a loving father to these children who nurtured and raised them, and MJs family is whom they know and love and who truly love them. It is in the best interest of MJs children to remain with the Jacksons and continue the bond they share with this strong, loving, supportive family. It would be criminal tear the children away from all whom they know and love, especially in light that the Jacksons are the only true family unit they have remaining.

P.S. If Debbie Rowe is owed an outstanding balance from MJ for her surrogate services, then just like in any other business dealing, she can stand in line with all the other creditors.

Posted at 1:49PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Jennifer

993. Debbie Rowe "wants" "her" kids?? Is she kidding? A REAL mother does not sell her eggs and rent her womb, then hand over the resulting product to someone else for a price and walk away--let alone TWICE!!!! Hmmm...sounds like selling cattle to the best buyer. Debbie Rowe told the entire world time, that these were MJs kids. Her actions and her words over the years proved this time and again, starting with the first child. She was paid handsomely for her services and should continue to walk on. She's a big girl. She knew the consequences. Why change anything now? She still has no real emotional or loving connection to the children and vice versa. MJ was a loving father to these children who nurtured and raised them, and MJs family is whom they know and love and who truly love them. It is in the best interest for all of MJs children to remain with the Jacksons and continue the bond they share with this strong, loving, supportive family. It would be criminal tear the children away from all whom they know and love and the only true family unit they have remaining.

P.S. If Debbie Rowe is owed an outstanding balance from MJ for her surrogate services, then just like in any other business dealing, she can stand in line with all the other creditors.

Posted at 3:35PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Me

994. You all think, you know Katherine Jackson now? Anyone who stated that Joe jackson, will get ANYTHING from his sons estate is WRONG. Debbie Rowe, is a Money hungry hoe. She didn't care about those kids as long as MJ was alive, she will have no legal stanging, even if she proves shes the biological Mommy, as she obviously, accepted much $$$$ from the
K.O.P. before he died, to leave her children alone!

Posted at 3:18AM on Aug 9th 2009 by The real John Connor Stood up