Debbie Rowe -- Out to Pasture

31. she is a bitch right from the start,noway she is having does kids,remember she is gross.

Posted at 6:24PM on Jul 3rd 2009 by michael jackson fan for life

32. She looks like Jeff Daniels which is pretty fitting because her and Michael are Dumb and Dumber.

Posted at 10:05AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by Voice of Reason

33. Disrupt their life ?

She is not the one who abruptly disturbed their life by doing drugs and getting overdosed. Those children were raised by Michael not by their grand mother.

She is the biologial and legal mother. Still a question mark above Michael being the legal father. And If he had made it and all the drugs related stories would have made it public, he would have been the first one to be thrown to jail for raising children among lethal drugs !

Since she asked for joint custody for years, since she is the bio and only legal direct parent left, since those jacksons are not even sure to be legally bonded to them. she has more than any one else the right to fight to get her children back.

The Jacksons have demonstrated that they are the worst parents by making sure that the only sane person around those children, their own mother was put away in a shameful and illegal settlement after having raised them for three years while letting their son doing his nasty drugs addiction around those same kids he was supposed to protect and raise. What a lovely parents they are !.

Posted at 4:02PM on Jul 3rd 2009 by She asked joint custody for the last 7 years

34. WOW !!!!!! A NORMAL LOOKING PERSON IN THIS CIRCUS OF FREAKS. I hope she gets those kids out of their current situation while they can still be salvaged. Go Debbie Go Debbie, now is your chance to show them a mother's love and care, Good Luck

Posted at 10:07AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by submarine

35. The children need to stay together with the people who loved their father. "Grandpa" isn't going to do anything to those kids ... Tito, Marlon, etc. will make sure of that. As far as I know, she hasn't tried for joint custody or even visition rights in 14 years. Does she want the kids or the package that comes with them? I think it would be truly extremely sad for those children to be torn apart and put with someone they don't even know. The three kids need to stay together and be raised by the Jackson Family ~ the entire family.

Posted at 10:13AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by Jack54

36. Why is everyone throwin' Katherine's age out there. She's only 79! She could have 10-15 years left in her life easy. If she only lived 10 more years, bothe Prince and Paris will be 22 and 21. Blanket would be 17. These kids will be fine with her and the Jackson family. She has a staff with her that will be taking care of things. Her love will be there for the kids. Quit bringin' up the age, it's useless. Debbie Rowe only wants money, it's obvious... -Steve

Posted at 10:07AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by MJFan4LIFE

37. 1. She's their mother. Her rights are above those of the money-grubbing J family. Yes, even Katherine. Katherine's the one who enabled Joe to abuse and molest her kids when they were little. Who knows what he'd do to Prince, Paris and Blanket? Start the "Jackson 3" for his new record label and patent as new chewable drug called "Baby Demerol", specially designed to help kids feel better after their star-pushing relatives have put them through ANOTHER song/dance routine? Look what the J family did to MJ?
2. Who cares what she looks like? As long as she's healthy (physically, mentally, emotionally), it doesn't matter. At least she's not hooked up to an IV and taking daily "health tonic" Demerol shots.
3. Does she love them? Reading about her attitude to her kids - it's a bit scary. It's true she basically sold them. Her quotes about how she basically "had them as a gift for MJ" - scary stuff. It's like the kids were toys/slaves to be tossed around, as she chose. That's a sick attitude. Doesn't matter who the parents are, ALL KIDS need BOTH PARENTS or parent-like figures in their life.

NOW all of a sudden, she's realizing what? That A) she can make more money out of them, or B) that she actually was wrong to think being a birth mother could be thrown away like this. Now she realizes that her kids (like all other human beings on the planet duh) need their parents, both of them. But does that mean she loves them or could love them? She sounds messed up in a different way than MJ, but still messed up - treating her kids like objects, property.
5. She wants a restraining order on Joe Jackson. Sounds good, but is all this vacillating on her part a way to indicate to the J Family that she's willing to make yet another deal (caCHING!)
4. Would Katherine with spill-the-beans nanny Grace be a better alternative? See above on Katherine. Grace? Don't know. Deepak Chopra seems to have a very high opinion of her. Hard to tell in all this.
5. Like others here, I'm thinking almost anyone who's drug free and actually CARES ABOUT THESE KIDS is better than the J Family.
6. In the end, I agree with others. Doesn't look like these kids have a chance..... It's awful.

Posted at 10:16AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by Truthteller

38. i think she should just stick with the horses

Posted at 3:44AM on Jul 5th 2009 by sammy

39. I happen to agree I feel the Michael's kids would be better off with anyone other than his immediate family but certainly not Debbie Rowe. I don't give a crap if she is the biological mother of those two beautiful children. This woman essentially sold her kids to Micheal for a large sum of money not once but twice. No mother who sells her children deserves to have them handed over to her in the wake of their father's death. I know it would never happen but these kids deserve to be with a regular family where they can grow up and be regular kids and do the kinds of things that all kids do..Debbie needs to get a grip..She does not love those kids she only sees the dollar signs that she could get if she takes them back...

Posted at 10:13AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by Julie

40. I think the 11 year old girl would love to ride horses and go to horse shows.
Young girls love that, we keep horses for our 12 year old.
Debbie could provide a much more stable life than the crazy Jacksons.

Posted at 10:11AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by Dee

41. DEBBIE FIGHT FOR WHAT??????????? SHE GOT HER CHILDREN, HER HORSES. SHE NEEDS 2 STAY ON HER FARM/RANCH WITH THEM. MJ GAVE HER WHAT SHE WANTED. TO THE JACKSON FAMILY, MAY GOD BE WITH U ALL. FOR THE CHILDREN, JANET STEP UP 2 THE PLATE, U AN UR HUBBY FIGHT FOR THE CHILDREN. U 2 BRING THE NANNY, GRANDMA, AN KIDS 2 **ATL** FAR AWAY FROM THE SPOT LIGHT. GOD PLEASE BE WITH MJ CHILDREN, THEY WERE HIS LIFE, AN HIS LOVE. MONEY IS THE ROOT 2 ALL EVIL, JANET U AN UR MAN HAVE MONEY, AN LOVE DO WHAT IS RIGHT. DO SOMETHING FOR UR BROTHER NOW. GET HIS CHILDREN, LOVE THEM THE WAY HE LOVED THEM, AND TAKE CARE OF THEM. RIP MJ. I DON"T CARE WHAT REPORTERS SAY ABOUT U NOBODY WILL NEVER TAKE UR PLACE IN THE MUSIC IND. U ARE THE ** KING OF POP **.

Posted at 11:45AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by a(mom)

42. Yep, I agree that FAT ASS bitch gave the kids for MONEY and now she wants the kid for MONEY.

Posted at 10:12AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by Eddie

43. Please don't let the Wackson family get those kids. They are probably screwed up enough. Give them to Debbie.

Posted at 10:12AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by harriettubman

44. She has a love of horses. They don't disappoint her. And yes, even though she is no real beauty she - At lease she LOOKS normal and happy. She loved Michael and trusted him. Once he got what he wanted, he kicked her to the curb. She had no power to do anything because it costs MONEY to pay attorneys. She was trapped in many ways. I can understand that. No one can blame her now that he is gone to go after them CONSIDERING WHAT A SCREWED up family the Jackson;s are - YES HIS MOM included to put up with an abusive husband and to allow that jerk of a dad to beat Michael into performing " all the way to the bank" - because he knew Michael was the talented one (outside of crazy loon Janet). The mother wants money too. They are all broke. They had to file bankruptcy and it took 10 years to finalize. THEY HAVE NO MONEY. MICHAEL WAS THEIR CASH COW.

Debbie needs to get them away fast. Hope she gets Blanket too. The administrators need to get control of the estate. Even then, Micheal was not too shrewd to have left 40% to his mother. The father will benefit and when they both die - all of his brothers, The man really should have been more cautious when he made his will. His kids deserved it all.

Posted at 10:13AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by bunnytooth

45. I hope she gets them and takes them far away from that ucked up poor excuse for a family. As far as DNA you can see her in them. There is not an African American gene in those little bodies of theirs. That is the best thing they have going for them, they are NOT genetically linked to that child molesting wanna be white piece of $h!te!
Good luck Debbie, he can't do nothing but rot in hell now sweetie ;-)

Posted at 10:14AM on Jul 3rd 2009 by Simply Trisha