Debbie Rowe -- Full House?

31. How old Debbie Rowe looks is not even an issue. How you age is genetic. Everyone knows that "black don't crack," "brown don't frown," and "white is never tight."

Posted at 1:09PM on Jul 4th 2009 by viviana

32. My father died when I was 13. No one can explain to another person what it feels like to lose a parent at that age but it had a devastating impact on me that's still with me today. If I had been taken from the only family members I knew and placed with a woman I'd seldom/never seen, I can't imagine what that would have done to me. This would be even more difficult if I'd been separated from my siblings at that time, as could happen to Michael's children. If Debbie truly loves them as she says she does, she will let them live wherever they choose, wherever they need to be. Taking those kids away at a time like this (and possibly separating them from each other as well) would have lifelong repercussions. I think the Jackson family should offer her a monetary settlement and make her go away forever, unless the children choose to see her at some point in their lives.

Posted at 1:18PM on Jul 4th 2009 by MJM

33. It's in the cards now, Debbie will get the kids and they will grow up sane, secure, confident, optimistic, balanced, accomplished, independent and they will probably have Janet Jackson's phone number and will probably have totally forgotten about those old dead guys Michael and Joe.

Posted at 4:12PM on Jul 4th 2009 by PolarBear

34. I think Debbie should definitely get the kids over Michael's mother Katherine. What people are forgetting is that Katherine and Joe are 80 years old! You might think it would be sweet for the kids to be raised by her, but let's face it, the kids will most likely be raised by the butlers and maids! They need a REAL mother and father figure. By the time the youngest is 18 years old, they will both be in their 90's if they make it that far. And what if Katherine dies in the next few years, then what? Hand the kid's over to Joe who will most likely force them to start singing and dancing under the crack of his belt?

The kids don't need to grow up in some kind of circus, and that is exactly what will happen if they go to the Jackson family.

Posted at 1:34PM on Jul 4th 2009 by Toby

35. Well she should get joint custody with Katherine Jackson

Posted at 1:59PM on Jul 4th 2009 by Stan

36. i hope michaels mom survive this, again and again Michael trusted the wrong person, a greedy person who was after his money also, the people who want Debbie to get the children, like her see dollar signs, they don't care about those children,

Posted at 2:09PM on Jul 4th 2009 by poor katherine

37. If Katherine gets those kids they'll be shipped off to the kingdom hall so fast their heads will spin. Goodbye Christmas, goodbye birthday, goodbye holidays...hello jehovah's witness bible study group. Like they aren't confused enough already without being exposed to a freakin' cult. Poor kids. Let Debbie take them, at least they'll be allowed to celebrate life.

Posted at 2:24PM on Jul 4th 2009 by no.more.christmas

38. DEBBIE I AM SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS, BUT, DEBBIE HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU GOT PAID FOR YOUR SWEET CHILDRENS, DEBBIE DOES THOSE CHILDREN KNOW THAT THEIR MOM SOLD THEM MORE THAN ONE TIME ALREADY, DEBBIE BELIEVE ME I KNOW THAT THERES PAIN IN CHILD BIRTH , BUT IF I WAS GETTING PAID 4-MIL A CHILD I WOULD HAVE KEPT HAVING BABIES AND MADE MYSELF A BILLIONAIRE, AND NOW BLESS YOUR HEART YOU WANT THEM BACK I JUST HEARD YOU SAY THAT YOU HAD THOSE CHILDREN FOR MICHAEL AND THAT HE WAS A GOOD DADDY TO THE CHILDREN I WISH YOU LUCK BUT THATS SAD WHEN A MOTHER SELLS HER BABIES .

Posted at 2:41PM on Jul 4th 2009 by SAY IT AINT SO

39. Giving birth to a child does not make you a "mother". This woman, Rowe, made a decision to give her children away for
monetary gain, and not just once but a reported 3 times already, each time costing Michael more money to satisfy her
urge to be a "monther". What kind of woman does that? Her motivation from day one has been money and she was
paid very well so my guess is she'll be looking for another pay day to once again silent her urge to be a "mother".
Michaels children deserve better than that. The Jackson family have been involved in the childrens lives since they
were born, all the while, Ms. Rowe was on her NEW ranch (compliments of MJ) spending her new found wealth and
most likely eating ho-ho's. In my opionion she is less fit to be a mother to those (beautiful) kids than Bubbles the chimp!.
Let the children decide. They are old enough now to decide where they would want to be and my guess is it will be nowhere close to their "mother". (Cha-ching).
Rest in Peace Michael. We love and Miss you terribly. May god embrace and comfort your family during this extremely
painful time. You will live on in our hearts forever and ever and ever and ever..............

Posted at 2:43PM on Jul 4th 2009 by Gracie - R.I.P. Michael

40. Mulberry, #4, I am curious as to your observations about the situation that occurred between Debbie and Michael, their children and the Jacksons.

Posted at 3:04PM on Jul 4th 2009 by Sarah

41. Paris told MJ that she wanted a mommy! Well guess what folks, she has one!! Hopefully Debbie will get the chance to raise her kids! We may not like her but she is the bio mom so give her a break!!

Posted at 3:11PM on Jul 4th 2009 by Joe Jackson screwed up Michael

42. Honestly, she looks to me like so many of the other people I know that are in some aspect of the horse biz. Keep in mind, formal wear for cowboys is often a new pair of Wranglers and your good boots.

Look back at the pix of the two of them in their wedding picture, she looks radiant, Michael was looking scary. She really was lovely in her day and she is now at an age that women aren't just as likely to wake up everyday naturally beautiful. She isn't walking around looking fake, which says that she isn't concerned about being shallow, which is an accomplishment considering the magnitude. You know good and well she could have had an awful lot of invites over the years and kept up with the barbies in so cali, but there she is a regular person.

She isn't glamorous but she appears to not be an addict, is intelligent and is stable in a quiet life. That's a good thing.

Posted at 3:20PM on Jul 4th 2009 by Sarah

43. "she's the natural mother' umm so was Casey Anthony, by no means does that mean she'd be a good mother. IMHO, it was a business deal, she basically sold those 2 kids (might as well have sold her soul to the devil). She is not the birth mother of the 3rd child, and it would be terrible for those 3 kids to be split up.

Posted at 3:41PM on Jul 4th 2009 by Vince Viagra

44. This women is just an absolute "Pig" inside, outside and all around. Money is HER GOD.....What I don't understand is why Michael Jackson would choose her to have the children. He could have paid someone that was good looking at least and didn't worship the almighty dollar. She wants the kids for the money they will inherit. she admitted, she doesn't even know them nor did she care to. Absoluetly disgusting Hog. Katherine fight for those kids, they need you and the love of your family.

Posted at 10:11PM on Jul 4th 2009 by Joy Marie

45. Sarah, you're right, she does look like 'horse' people and I'm surrounded by them here in Burbank (Equestrian Center i.e. Summer Olympics)...anyway, to most intelligent people, it's really not about the looks, it's what she did and how she did it. She could look like Grace Kelly and it wouldn't change the facts. Also, biology will not be the only deciding factor to a judge, many factors will be considered by the courts, not just the blood, many blood relatives in less of a circus act have lost their kids to the other parent or custodians, the public doesn't get to decide, the courtroom does.

Posted at 4:05PM on Jul 4th 2009 by Meow!