Beauty
Winona Ryder: Good Genes or Good Docs?

Believe it or not, Winona Ryder has been in the industry for over 20 years.

Winona Ryder

Here's the 17-year-old starlet back in 1989 (left) -- and 20 years later, the 37-year-old version at an event in NYC in May (right).

She should be arrested for looking this good.



Tags: good docs, good genes, GoodDocs, GoodGenes, Winona Ryder, WinonaRyder

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 5) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. I seem to recall she had surgery on her nose many years ago, and it was actually a medical surgery, not a plastic.

Anyways, it still puzzles me, how she seems to get more flak from stealing stuff, getting caught, going to trial, and, here's the important part, serving her community service with distinction, than OJ gets from butchering two people...

And still looks good.

Posted at 2:02PM on Jul 5th 2009 by Jarska

32. She's only 37 years old';it is quite possible to look like she does with out doctors---I am 50 years old and have been blessed with looking younger than my years without medical intervention. My parents also stayed looking younger than their years without aid as well;it's genetics. So to the nay sayers--good genes along with a good skin care regimen(Winona a,sways has been pale,doesn't tan) really are the reasons for her appearance today.

Posted at 3:05PM on Jul 5th 2009 by cleo

33. Good thing she has SHECKLES otherwise , today she would be looking like Helen Thomas, the news lady that has been asking questions of president for the last 90 years- Wynona was ugly at 17 and the only reason she became a "star" is because she has friends at her SINNERGOGUE!!!

Posted at 3:05PM on Jul 5th 2009 by Raffaele Zuccaro

34. HER NOSE LOOKS ALOT DIFFERENT FROM HOW IT LOOK YEARS BEFORE

Posted at 3:16PM on Jul 5th 2009 by pollita1234

35. Her rack is amazing.

Posted at 3:51PM on Jul 5th 2009 by superchunk

36. At 37 years of age, no lady should have any wrinkles. unless they smoked, stayed out in the sun without sun block, and/or did not get a good diet. If she had really bad genes she could have bad skin at that young of an age; but, 37 year old skin should not look much older than that of a teenager.

Posted at 11:56PM on Jul 6th 2009 by Bambi

37. It looks like she had a nose job but who cares, she looks beautiful so maybe it's good genes and good doc.... just sayin

Posted at 4:21PM on Jul 5th 2009 by just my opinion

38. That's got to be a nose job!! probably a few injectables. c'mon it's hollywood

Posted at 1:23AM on Jul 6th 2009 by Anticelebrity-net

39. Oh yeah, her nose looks completely different!

Posted at 5:09PM on Jul 5th 2009 by stephanie

40. #19 - #15 is correct - she DID have a problem with MISSING JEWELRY not too long ago -
Once a thief, ALWAYS A THIEF!!!!

Posted at 5:41PM on Jul 5th 2009 by LOCK HER UP!

41. She has dropped the baby fat and may have had her nose tweeked. But the rest looks as it should for a pampered Hollywood starlet. Or former starlet. When was her last hit?

Posted at 5:59PM on Jul 5th 2009 by Misplaced Texan

42. Some people actually take care of themselves. Good genes.

Posted at 6:09PM on Jul 5th 2009 by Ralph

43. She's got a seldom seen rack as well.

Posted at 8:21PM on Jul 5th 2009 by HeHateMe

44. She may be a kook, but she's as pretty as can be.

Posted at 9:13PM on Jul 5th 2009 by Rocco

45. She looks great...But looks like a mose job might of taken place at some stage, it was a lot broader in the early days and now looks more nipped.

Posted at 9:35PM on Jul 5th 2009 by Susie

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments