Beware of Debbie Rowe

Sometimes a sign from a hardware store tells the whole story ....

Beware of Debbie Rowe

Debbie Rowe
at her Ranch in Palmdale, CA

Tags: debbie rowe, DebbieRowe, jackson children, jackson custody, jackson kids, JacksonChildren, JacksonCustody, JacksonKids, michael jackson, MichaelJackson

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 18) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. That shirt doesnt lie! It sums up the psychology of this woman......she wants a meal ticket and wants someone to payfor it! Let this be a learning experience for the living..... be extra careful of the company you keep.....your actions my haunt your loved ones long after you are gone ...no one is here to defend the weak and vulnerable from the wolves and vampires in sheep's clothing

Posted at 11:21AM on Jul 11th 2009 by Golden Ticket

32. Debbie Rowe did not ask for all this media attention...I would be cussing at people who thought they had a right to touch me or stick cameras in my face because an ex-husband had died. And you tell me who would not have married MJ and had children for him if they were asked? Not anyone who loved him or wanted him to be happy. Don't be jealous because it wasn't you who is forever tied to him. She has stayed out of the spotlight...We have put her there because of something she had no control over. And btw if every mom with a temper and every mom who cussed was considered unfit then I'd say there would be about 50 moms in the USA that would be able to keep thier own kids. Just sayin.......

Posted at 11:20AM on Jul 11th 2009 by getoverit

33. I believe Debbie Rowe only wants custody of the children to prevent that pig-pimp Joe Jackson from having access to them. I do not doubt anyone, including Debbie Rowe, thinks Katherine Jackson should raise the children. However, the legal fact remains, Katherine and Joe are still married. As it stands right now, he WILL have contact with the children. And THAT is what people should be worried/upset about.

Posted at 11:22AM on Jul 11th 2009 by Jane

34. 23. IF DEBBIE ROWE GAINS CUSTODY OF HER NATURAL CHILDREN, IT WILL NOT BE LONG BEFORE THEY WILL BE SHOVELING HORSE "DIRT" AND ANIMAL "DIRT" UNTIL THEIR HANDS BLEED, AND A LIFE THEY ARE TOTALLY FOREIGN TO. MEANWHILE, THEIR MOTHER WILL BE LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK, TRIUMPHANTLY, CLUTCHING FIVE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS (REPORTEDLY) AS THE BIGGEST LOTTERY WINNER, EVER!!! IT WILL NOT BE LONG BEFORE THE CHILDREN WILL ADOPT FOUL LANGUAGE AND ATTITUDE AS THEIR MOTHER HAS DEMONSTRATED. IF ANY JUDGE RULES IN FAVOR OF DEBBIE ROWE, THAT WOULD BE AMONG THE GREATEST TRAGEDIES OF OUR COUNTRY. HOPEFULLY, THE CHILDREN WILL HAVE SOME SAY CONCERNING THEIR FUTURE. WE CAN ONLY HOPE!!!

Posted at 11:16AM on Jul 11th 2009 by Butterfly

WHY would this be "among the greatest tragedies of our country . . ."??? Because she isn't a Jackson???? Look at the things we hear about them?? And who knows what goes on behind the scenes??? So these kids wouldn't be living the life they've become accustomed too! There is nothing wrong with working on a farm, and doing the work that this environment entails. Maybe you would be swearing like a truck driver too if you had people pushing cameras into your face and watching your every move-whether you "chose" that life by becoming involved with someone famous, etc. or not. And IF she did come into a lot of money, so what???? Are you jealous because it's not you????? I'm sure Debbie Rowe isn't even close to being perfect, but are you AND your motives all the time either????? Do you walk on water??????

Posted at 11:23AM on Jul 11th 2009 by Reynaldo

35. I do feel the press has hounded Debbie, they need to leave this woman alone!!! however, in no way do i think she should EVER have custody of thw children, whatever else Michael did, he did a fantastic job raising his children.... so evident. I pray they follow his last wishes, the children look so content with the jackson family..... JUST KEEP THAT S.O.B. JOE AWAY FROM THEM!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 11:24AM on Jul 11th 2009 by Mary_Boca

36. She does not care about the children cause if she did she would not have given them up in the first place. I love my children and they are my life and i would die for each one of them.If she wanted custody then how come she did not go for it when Michael was alive,because horrible as it sounds but the children are now worth money and that is all this selfish poor excuse for a woman cares about. I just pray that no judge gives her custody as this would ruin the childrens lifes and they deserve to be with Michaels family who love and care about them and would never sell them for a price.
Please let Michaels wishes be carried out and let them have all the things he wanted for them and all the love,care and support he knew they would get from his family.
RIP Michael. xxxxxxxxx

Posted at 11:24AM on Jul 11th 2009 by mandy - England

37. Seems like you debbie haters, don't want the kids to be raised by someone who likes the outdoors, and shovels their house out. But, these kids might benefit from living in the real world, you know, going to real school, doing chores, etc They might end up like Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, etc Besides, you can give them to Katherine and Joe Nice alternative.
The agreement in the divorce will in fact trump the will!!!! Nice!!!!

Posted at 11:29AM on Jul 11th 2009 by jobabe

38. Leave her alone..... She is the biological mother of these children.. More than MJ can say..... She has every right to gain custody of her children, just like every man out there can after years being apart from their kids......SHe is NOT the pedophile here.... She may be normal looking like the rest of the world...Something the kids haven't seen for a long time.... I doubt she would be stoned to high heaven every second like their father... And as for the sign.... Its a common sign that anyone can hang in their drive way..... You can buy it from Walmart... Better than hanging your kid over the edge of a balcony .... Get your kids Debbie... give them a normal life away from the wacko's.....

Posted at 11:29AM on Jul 11th 2009 by mumof3

39. Mrs. Rowe - WE HAVE UNDERSTOOD AFTER MICHAEL'S DEATH THAT YOU ARE THE BIOLOGICAL MOTHER OF TWO OF THE KIDS... WE ARE BEGGING YOU THAT YOU TAKE FULL CONSIDERATION ABOUT YOUR X-HUSBAND WILL THAT HE WANTED THE THREE KIDS TO BE TAKEN CARE OF MY HIS **SOLE MOTHER ** (NOT THE FATHER) AND AT LEAST THOSE KIDS LOVES THEIR GRANDMATHER AND DURING THE MEMORIAL, WE ALL COULD SEE THE CLOSENESS THOSE 3 KIDS HAD WITH THEIR GRANDMA, UNCLES, AUNTS AND WHEN THEY ARE AT THE HOME OF THEIR GRANDMATHER KATHERINE, AT LEAST THEY HAVE SO MANY COUSINS THAT THEY CAN PLAY AROUND WITH..
I KNOW AND WE ALL KNOW THAT WE ARE PETRIFIED ABOUT MICHEAL FATHER *MR. JOE JACKSON*. i WISH THAT YOU COULD AT LEAST HAVE UR LAWYER *** PLACE A PERMANENT RESTRICTION ** ON mR. JOE JACKSON NOT TO BE IN THAT HOUSE AT ALL WITH YOUR 2 KIDS AND BLANKET. BUT, AGAIN mRS. rOWE WE HAVE SEEN INTERVIEWS FROM YOU THAT YOU DID IT FOR MICHAEL TO HAVE BOTH KIDS FOR HIM AND BLANKET FROM OTHER SOURCES AND TRULLY MENTIONED THAT ** YOU NEVER WANTED TO BE CALLED MOM**. i WOULD JUST FIGHT TO HAVE MR. JOE JACKSON *** NOT TO BE IN THEIR PRESENCE *** 100 % OF THE TIME WHEN THEY ARE WITH THEIR BELOVED KATHERINE JACKSON. WE ALL COULD SEE THE LOVE AND COMPASSION THAT THOSE 3 KIDS ARE GIVEN BY MRS. JACKSON , AUNTS, UNCLES, AND OTHER COUSINS. AT LEAST IF THEY STAYED WITH KATHERINE JACKSON (SINCE WHEN THEY WERE BORN, THEY HAVE HAD NO ONE TO PLAY WITH EXCEPT THEIR DADDY - MAY HE REST IN PEACE NOW... BUT AGAIN, KATHERINE JACKSON AND HER KIDS WOULD *** LOVE AND LOVE AND PROVIDE ALL THE SECURITY THEY WOULD NEED AT THIS DIFFICULT TIME... THEY DO NOT EVEN KNOW U... HOW COULD THOSE CHILDREN BARE WITH THAT??? THAT WOULD TRAUMATIZE THEM ALL... AGAIN, WE DO NOT WANT THOSE 3 GORGEOUS KIDS TO HAVE TO GO THRU WHAT MICHAEL WENT THRU WITH HIS FATHER...
***** MRS. ROWE, IF YOU DECIDE TO PROVIDE THOSE 3 KIDS TO KATHERINE JACKSON (SHE WILL DO AN AWESOME JOB) I HIGHKY RECOMMEND THAT ***** A RESTRAINING ORDER BE PLACED ON JOE JACKSON NOT TO EVER SEE THOSE 3 KIDS ****** AND AT LEAST YOU WILL KNOW THAT THEY ARE SAFE AND SOUND WITH THEIR GRANDMA, AUNTS, UNCLES, AND SIBBLINGS... JUST GET RID OF JOE JACKSON.....

Posted at 11:30AM on Jul 11th 2009 by Shirliana

40. Comment made by mumof3. Are you out of your mind!!!! Y

Posted at 11:32AM on Jul 11th 2009 by mandy - England

41. DR shirt said basically Trick R Treat !!!! The Kids or the Money !! She looks like a lesbian that had the kids for the money... She has no maternal instincts........Nobody Rides the bus for free?? Debbie already got paid 8.2 Million..... She got paid for the kids... Her ride is over...

Posted at 11:33AM on Jul 11th 2009 by real people

42. Has anyone else heard why the custody has been pushed back another week? What the news channels are reporting there is some kinda arrangement/settlement going on between the Jacksons and Debbie Rowe.

Posted at 11:36AM on Jul 11th 2009 by Karamiia

43. I THINK MJS MOTHER SHOULD HAVE THE KIDS ALL THREE.DEBBIE ROWE HAS NOT BEEN CLOSE TO THEM. DEBBIE ROWE IS A MONEY GRABBER.SHE JUST WANTS MORE MONEY FROM THE JACKSONS, BECAUSE SHE BLEW ALL THE MONEY MJ GAVE HER. ABOUT JOE JACKSON, MJS MOTHER CAN GET A RESTRAINING ORDER TO KEEP HIM AWAY

Posted at 11:36AM on Jul 11th 2009 by wildman

44. Those kids are better off with the Jackson's rather than with this woman. She has already said publicly on several interviews that she NEVER WANTED TO BE A MOTHER. She said from her own mouth that she only did it so that Michael could be a father. Add to that the fact that she obviously has no patience and a bad temper as shown on tv the other day, I VOTE NO! Debbie needs to be left alone to tend to her horses which are the only kids that she should EVER have!

Posted at 1:02PM on Jul 11th 2009 by dr. phil

45. come on people debbie has a right to say where the kids go. and if i was her i sure would not let them be around jo at all.and think about it. i bet all of the family has skelitons in there closet. latoya has not worked in for ever who been keeping her up. good old michel i bet. and remenber when janet was on pills also. i think the judge needs to look at every one in the family. .all you have to do is follow the trail of address on the pill bottles and it takes you to the homes.

Posted at 11:42AM on Jul 11th 2009 by carol

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments