Rowe Lawyer -- $4 Million Deal Not True

Debbie Rowe LawyerDebbie Rowe's lawyer Eric George says the story that Rowe won't seek custody of the kids she bore for Michael Jackson in return for a cool $4 million is "completely false."

Eric George told CNN that no deal has been reached. Jackson's legal team said last week they were trying to "amicably resolve" the custody issues with Rowe.

Tags: child custody, ChildCustody, debbie rowe, DebbieRowe, lawyer, michael jackson, MichaelJackson

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 10) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. TMZ : PLEASE GET A BETTER PHOTO OF ROWE OMG! I JUST ATE! GEEEEEEEEEEZ

Posted at 4:03PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Not a Rowe fan

17. Looks like mountains of false informatio like MJ has 75 cars if so where are they? The photos of his bedroom look like he has trailer trash decorator and obsessive compulsive disorder. Where is the MAID?

Posted at 5:07PM on Jul 14th 2009 by jack in omaha

18. I WONDER HOW MJ PICKED THIS WHITE TRASH OUT OF ALL THE BEAUTIFUL GOOD LOOKING WOMEN IN THIS WORLD, WITH ALL THE MILLION SHE WAS PAID BY MJ, SHE STILL LOOK SO TERRIBLE I BET MY PUPPY LOOKS WAY BETTER THAN THIS TRASH. LOOK ALIKE OF A MONKEY

Posted at 2:23PM on Jul 14th 2009 by TEMMY

19. Am I the only one that finds all of this STRANGE, where was Mother "DEBBIE" when Michael was alive and going thru all of the hoopla? And the monies that he has already given her, which obviously purchased this farm, please explain her rights which where actually purchased for Paris x's 11 and Prince Michael x's 12 talking about the fat lady singing this individual has been cold paid. Why are the courts wasting time when she has been paid surrogate fees for a total of 900 surrogate mothers!

Posted at 2:24PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Mimi

20. Where are you getting the figure of 4 million, or that she's not taking that amount but waiting for more?

If there has been NO settlement..then the 4 million dollar figure is fiction.

Posted at 3:08PM on Jul 14th 2009 by smartcookie

21. i dont like her and i never did. i dont think she should have the kids. but thats my opinion.

Posted at 2:23PM on Jul 14th 2009 by tina

22. I do not understand - Debbie Rowe was married to Michael Jackson for over 2 years, gave birth to 2 children. Where I come from - she gave up her children but she did not sell them. How did she sell them. Most women would be given so much in alimony even with a pre-nup. She did not receive that much money for being married to Michael Jackson. Every last one of you - want her to be the villian that sold her kids. You want the doctors to be responsible for the drugs that he took and you want somebody responsible for his death. MICHAEL JACKSON WAS responsible and Debbie Rowe was wonderful when she defended him during his trial but now she is a money hungry B*itch.
I have never seen a divorce with a big celebrity end with such little money. WHO IS MONEY-HUNGRY

Posted at 2:25PM on Jul 14th 2009 by nikki\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s mom

23. If you had a child and that child lost its dad and you really cared about that child - You would go right then no matter what and be with that child and comfort that child- I am sorry but she might have gave birth but a mother I dont think so.

Posted at 2:48PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Mullins

24. To the Michael bashers, there are reams and reams of evidence out there proving he was innocent.
But you are too lazy to look for it. Azja Prior the mother of Chris Tucker's child, knew the second family well, because she was trying to help with money. She has sent an open letter to the family to tell the truth. She knows they are lying.
And Debbie Rowe is yet another in a long line of people who will sell their souls for money. That is why Michael is dead.
I am an adult, not a behind the screen name ass. I was also a paralegal and know the devastating effects that accusations of sexual molestation can do. Women sometimes use that weapon in a court of law during a volitaile divorce. Learn, kiddies, it is not too late to save that brain of yours.

Posted at 2:25PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Lenegal

25. im just a little kid--give me a break!

Why don't I just help you find an english class little blanket.

We all knew that Debbie wasn't going to take just 4 million. I suspect something in the range of 50 million over a number of years when this is over. She needs as much money as she can get to fix that ugly mug.

Posted at 2:19PM on Jul 14th 2009 by JoJo Dancer

Posted at 2:25PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Blanket

26. The sadness of the entire nightmare that must be if one is ,or, associated with the Jacksons! The 3 children grew up within some extreme circumstances with their father. Michael's parents did a fantastic job raising he and his sibilings,and we all know how ell they all have turned out!!If they are not posing naked, ,chart flops ,or, exposing their breasts at football games ,they are wanting to be in the spotlight for any sort of publicity! Selling off stories about their son,brother is always a good thing.Drugs, denial, acting out fantasies of being Peter Pan, business ventures going sour,law suits, plastic awful surgies, to forcing the citizens of LA to pick up costs of all their messes is there ever going to be a end in site?
Rowe,is just another pawn in this mess,she can not do the right thing either way at the end of the day. If Katherine dies next year who is incharge then of these children? Joe? Tito? Janet, ect? Oh wait Dianna Ross...... Rowe, is any different than anyone from this nightmare family? Joe wants to get the kids on stage stage,the sooner the better,so they too can end up on the floor of their bedrooms with paamedics over their bodies!

Posted at 2:26PM on Jul 14th 2009 by jean

27. SHE'S A HORRIBLE WOMAN WHO HAS NO PROBLEM HAVING CHILDREN FOR MONEY. THEY SHOULD PAY HER SORRY ASS OFF JUST TO GET RID OF HER BECAUSE SHE ISN'T ANY KIND OF MOTHER. ALL SHE IS AFTER IS MONEY. SORRY PIECE OF TRASH. SHE'LL GET HERS.

Posted at 2:28PM on Jul 14th 2009 by ME

28. Debbie Rowe doesn't give a rats a** about her kids, all she cares about is money! If she cared about her kids then she wouldn't have let them go all these years, all the Jackson family has to do is flash a little more $$$ in her face and she'll disapear AGAIN! There is NO amount of money in the world that could convince me to give up my son, I would fight until the end. But she didn't, because she's a cold fish and those kids deserve better! Let them stay with their grandmother, aunts, and uncles......people who they actually know and love.

Posted at 7:17PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Mags

29. TMZ... please please please more Michael Jackson news!!! If there's one thing this world doesn't have enough of it's information about Michael Jackson!! Thanks TMZ, you make this world a better place!

Posted at 2:49PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Enough already

30. WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME ONE BIT IF SHE DIDN'T HAVE HIM KILLED FOR HIS MONEY.

Posted at 2:29PM on Jul 14th 2009 by ME

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments