Rowe's Lawyer -- Debbie Doesn't Want MJ's Money

Debbie Rowe's lawyer just fired off a letter to the New York Post ... demanding a retraction of its story that Rowe has accepted $4 million to walk away from Michael Jackson's two eldest kids.

Debbie Rowe - Launch docs

The letter -- written by Rowe's lawyer Eric George -- says "Among the several contenders for overzealous and inaccurate sensationalism, the New York Post has now seized top honors."

George says "Ms. Rowe has not accepted -- and will not accept -- any additional financial consideration beyond the spousal support she and Michael Jackson personally agreed to several years ago." This is a very significant statement and we've confirmed it with another Jackson source.


Debbie Rowe Click to view!

Tags: child custody, ChildCustody, debbie rowe, DebbieRowe, lawsuit, michael jacksons kids, MichaelJacksonsKids, payoff

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 21) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. 14. Debbie Rowe should NOT get those kids or even visitation rights. Just as Latoya has stated, those kids know NOTHING about her and it would be damaging for them to ALL OF A SUDDEN have to get to know this NEW LADY!! Why would she want to get to know these kids through any form of visitation now??? They have spent their lives with the Jackson family and she has been nowhere around so why change it. The ONLY REASON this chick has for trying to get close to them now is MONEY. She did an interview stating she DOES NOT WANT TO BE A MOTHER.. WELL... HELLOOOOO WHY THE HELL DO YOU WANT VISITATION RIGHTS AT ALL????

Posted at 3:17PM on Jul 14th 2009 by good girl
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Those kids HAVE NOT!!! spent their entire lives with the Jackson's. They don't know the Jackson's any more than they know Rowe. Michael has spent all these years isolated from his family, remember? Go Debbie!!!!

Posted at 3:22PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Lori

32. I cannot imagine those poor children living with that woman. The children are used to a different lifestyle and I think that will be devastating for them....if she really cares about the children she will be happy just by having visitation rights and being involved in the children's lives without receiving any money. But I am sure that won't be the case.

Greed makes people evil.

Posted at 3:24PM on Jul 14th 2009 by MARLA

33. Hold on there Nyte Tyger. Before you start touting the virtues of the ex Mrs. Jackson note that she IS receiving spousal support.

The two of them were married for less than 3 years. She in no way helped get him to where he was. She was not instrumental in his success, nor did she assist in his accumulation of wealth, yet she is receiving spousal support for a marriage that lasted less time than it takes to earn a bachelors degree and was dissolved nearly a decade ago. To put it another way, at the present time she has received spousal support for more than three times as long as the marriage lasted.

Your saying that "Just because you low lives would suck the pattern off a dinner plate for money, doesn't mean everyone (Debbie Rowe) is like that." is a bit off considering the amount of monetary compensation she has collected to date.

Posted at 3:23PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Mike

34. This women makes me sick, she sold her children and now she is comming back for more, Spousal support he is dead she should get nothing and never should have apporached the Jackson family for nothing she made her bed years ago when she sold the children now she needs to crawl back in her hole. Discusting person who does what she did.

Posted at 3:24PM on Jul 14th 2009 by pls

35. Why do you beleive everything you read???

What would you do if crap was written about you??

Maybe it SHOULD HAPPEN so some of it would come back to you!

Makes me ashamed to be a member of the human race.

Posted at 3:25PM on Jul 14th 2009 by iwasthere

36. Eric George, Esq., and Ms. Debbie Rowe...

Fight for her/your rights as a biological mother and gain full custodialship over these children as their only living and the gestational parent. Most of us are not sheeples of the media and will stand behind you 100 percent as we know "you" are their only hope for successful maturation during these critical years. What has occurred during the past two weeks of his death and, especially, during the funeral is quite disturbing to the logical minds of sensible Americans.

Posted at 3:26PM on Jul 14th 2009 by K.

37. Neither one of these people deserve these kids. Let them get adopted by someone who really wants kids. And not for the darn money

Posted at 3:26PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Nikki

38. SHE WANTS THE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 9:26AM on Jul 16th 2009 by Krysy

39. Debbie will be the biggest loser in all of this.
Time to return the money extorted from Jackson.
Looking forward to her pics in jail where she belongs with Klein et al cronies.

Posted at 3:28PM on Jul 14th 2009 by My name is Debbie Rowe and I am a Hillbille Hoe.

40. Given how emphatic the lawyer's statement is, it looks like Ms. Rowe is doing the right thing. They would look foolish if they now end up seeking money from the Jackson estate for not seeking custody.

Suggest we leave Ms. Rowe alone -- there seem to be plenty of villains in MJs life and sad passing (the doctors, some members of the Jackson family, some overzealous members of the media / paparazzi...), and she is one person who seems to be acting reasonably now. One may question her motives years ago in having the children, but I think she has been punished by the media and general public for years now that we should leave her alone.

Posted at 3:29PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Logical

41. 13. To All MJ Fans:

I am a 48 year old man and I would like to invite all of you to bring your children to my home so I can tuck them in my bed, give them milk and cookies and read them a story because it is "very sweet." ANY TAKERS???

Posted at 3:16PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Am I A Pedophile?

It depends. Are you worth enough money that I can sue you for diddling my boy and collect 25 million in a settlement which would set my kid up for the rest of his life and insure he would never go without? Is my boy's future worth a little diddling while he's young? I would say yes. What's your address?

Posted at 3:28PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Mike

42. To am I a pedophile , since you keep posting the same thing over and over , I find in very conerning and have forwarded you post to the proper authorities.

Posted at 3:28PM on Jul 14th 2009 by NotSoFunny

43. Supposedly she never received the $8 million she was supposed to get from the divorce. I bet she is trying to get that money, which could be more that the $4 million currently discussed.

Posted at 3:29PM on Jul 14th 2009 by cheddar

44. I shudder to think that the sick comments on some these posts may be attributed to PARENTS!

God help us all!

Posted at 3:30PM on Jul 14th 2009 by iwasthere

45. yeah right and in a few days or a week or two the TRUE reason will come out and you know what....it will be the same as today, she wants Money$$ and my reality is hey if you can get it and it's not illegal then hey why not because unfortunatly Money has become our new God for our generation and everyone is running around like rats in a cage trying to get as much as the can fro themselves and that is the ..truth!

Posted at 3:31PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Gidion

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments