Rowe's Lawyer -- Debbie Doesn't Want MJ's Money

46. If Debbie doesn't go after more money or after her kids, and does not want publicty, I guess all

you brainiacs will have left to criticize will be her looks !!!! Sad culture we live in

Posted at 3:32PM on Jul 14th 2009 by martha

47. Fox News pontificates as if they are moral high ground, but they are owned by news Corp, who owns the NY Post. Shows that they are all about $$$ not 'news' or 'telling the truth'.

So many repeat lies about Ms. Rowe, such as 'not her real kids', 'she took $$ and ran', or whatever. Do you really know what went on? So what?

Know nothings can accuse and point fingers, but if they are proven wrong, STFU!

Posted at 3:31PM on Jul 14th 2009 by tomcat

48. Doesn't spousal support end when the spouse dies? It sounds like she wants her spousal support to continue even after his death. Maybe there was a clause for that in her agreement. She was left out of the will. Maybe she will ask the estate for continued spousal support in exchange for relinquishing all parenting rights.

Posted at 6:56PM on Jul 16th 2009 by Mercy

49. 17. Instead of buying horses and a ranch - she should have used part of the $$$ she received years ago from Michael to have reconstructive surgery on her Jay Leno chin. No chance ANY type of plastic surgery could take away the fugly beast face in total.

--------------------------------------------
She still looks more human than most of the Jacksons who spent millions just to become walking freak show a la Jocelyn Silberstein...I mean Jackson had a fake nose that slips, a few gray hair on his bald head and a skin that looks like a landmine full of craterias underneath that deadly white make up. ! Debbie looks like a Godess by comparison.

Go Debbie, take your kiddies from those zombies.

Posted at 3:34PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Unbeleivable

50. Debbie, you worthless piece of crap, you don't want the kids, you want the money - you fat slob of a person - Jackson family fight her and get rid of her once and for all - crawl back under a rock.

Posted at 3:33PM on Jul 14th 2009 by lisa lee

51. 25. Eric George, Esq., and Ms. Debbie Rowe...

Fight for her/your rights as a biological mother and gain full custodialship over these children as their only living and the gestational parent. Most of us are not sheeples of the media and will stand behind you 100 percent as we know "you" are their only hope for successful maturation during these critical years. What has occurred during the past two weeks of his death and, especially, during the funeral is quite disturbing to the logical minds of sensible Americans.

Posted at 3:26PM on Jul 14th 2009 by K.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason why biological is a rationale here because of big money. Not love.
Your statement meant to say ' Fight for the MONEY Debbie...' How pathetic.
Kids should be loved and cared for not solicited as pawns for this trailer trash.
Countdown to the showdown.
Rowe is pathetic, shameful. They need to investigate the injections into her animals too.

Posted at 3:34PM on Jul 14th 2009 by My name is Debbie Rowe and I am a Hillbille Hoe.

52. no one is buying into this story - we all know she wants more than $4 million dollars!

Posted at 7:22PM on Jul 14th 2009 by ladyofargonne

53. Sure she doesn't want money. If she really wanted to be in the kids lives, she could have set up visitation right any time within the last 10 years. She had rights because the State of California did not allow her to terminate her rights like she wanted. It amazes me that people are okay with putting kids with a person they don't know. You could tell at the memorial that those kids knew and were attached to the Jackson, no matter if you like them or not.

Posted at 3:39PM on Jul 14th 2009 by JoJo Dancer

54. Shouldn't spousal support end when an ex-spouse dies? She states now she doesn't want MJ's money, than give up the spousal support, he's not here now, he shouldn't have to support when he's in the grave.
We'll see when she meets with the Jackson's and see how much money she doesn't want.
I'll believe it when I see it.

Posted at 3:45PM on Jul 14th 2009 by kris

55. Why does Debbie Rowe look so ROUGH!! She has all that money and she hasn't even thought about spending some of it on her appearance?? What makes it so bad is.. she actually WORKED at a dermatologist office... GO FIGURE. How did she go to work at a place the specializes in skin treatments and never got her own skin fixed. This woman looks MUCH OLDER then what she really is. WOW,, Debbie, you might want to consider a make-over dear!!

Posted at 4:46PM on Jul 14th 2009 by oops

56.
All these people talking about what a real mother does...how about saying that a real mother doesn't stand by and let her kids get beat and abused over and over and over again. Katherine is no saint.

Go Debbie. Get the kids.

People here can see that these posters are MJ fans in denial and/or the Jackson camp trying to smear her. The public can figure things out.
We don't know what agreement she had with MJ in the first place. All of you all coming down on her looks, don't foget MJ is the one that picked her. Look at him if you think looks make a difference.

Posted at 3:45PM on Jul 14th 2009 by GO DEBBIE!

57. you mean, Debbie Rowe doesn't want MORE OF Michael's money.
i'm sure Michael gave her a fortune already!

Posted at 3:47PM on Jul 14th 2009 by This Is It

58. I've never thought it was about the money for Debbie. She has been very happy with her horse ranch out in the middle of the desert. she could not stand Michael's glitzy life style. The 8 mil was not for the purchase of the children. It was her divorce settlement and not very much considering. Look how Heather Mills took Paul McCartney after only 4 years of marriage. It was right for Michael to compensate the woman who gave him such wonderful gifts. She did it for Michael, not so Joe and Katherine would raise them someday. That was not the agreement. Mivhael did not have the legal right to leave the children to anyone in his will as long as their mother is a live.

Posted at 3:47PM on Jul 14th 2009 by No way!

59. Neither one of them should get the kids.
Janet should get them. She cares about the kids and is younger then the grandma and Debbie. She also isn't in the media that much.

Posted at 3:47PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Jen

60. I must say that I don't think she needs anymore cash. She should still be loaded from the other pay off. Ya think? Hell no she don't need no more. She would probably like some more. But has enough to last her the rest of her fat life. She aint missin' any meals or snacks. OBVIOUSLY!!!

Posted at 3:48PM on Jul 14th 2009 by Janice Wemyss