Rowe Not Looking for Cash Cow

61. ws she a man and turned into a woman? i don't get it?
she would make a good wrestler, the face alone would scare her opponent.g

Posted at 9:18AM on Jul 16th 2009 by afanofmj

62. Question, wouldn't the money issues be between the trustees of the estate and not the Jackson family? If it was about the money MJ had an agreement with her then since he is dead the money is not owed her. Depending if there are legal documents that reflect that agreement. If she is holding the children over the families head saying if they don't give her the money then she will seek custody of the kids then isn't that extortion? It doesn't make any sence to me how she can do this and not get in legal problems. I think the kids are better off with her over Katherine only because we can see Joe Jackson already talking about how the youngest one Blanket has MJ moves and can dance. MJ hated his father and the way he was treated and raised. You know if Katherine gets the kids this will happen. It is a mess! I wish Janet would of been granted custody of the kids.

Posted at 8:18AM on Jul 15th 2009 by annette covert

63. Debbiie Rowe and Dr Klien have conspored to KILL Micheal Jackson she know he had drug problem and she SOLD her chikren to him knowing his life will be shorten. She even assist in giving him IV Know she want her kids well her and Dr Klien shoulkd refund Michela Jackson 9 Millions is what I heard she SOLD them for. I Hope they get what they deserve JUSTCE has they prey on Michela Jackson Money Why are we hearing about drug abuse now No Onee said anything before the man death I hope Justice is served to Debbie Rowe Dr Klien who has lied and Murray the black dumb doc they sent to finish Micheal Jacson off.

Posted at 11:09PM on Jul 19th 2009 by Debbie Rowe

64. I THINK THAT BI*TH IS SHOULD SIT THE FU*K BACK AND LET HIS MOTHER HAVE THEM ALL SHE EVER WANTED WAS MONEY

Posted at 8:37AM on Jul 15th 2009 by joan

65. She's not looking for a cash cow? Well, I guess not. Not a new one, anyway. She's looking to make sure her cash cow goes on as planned!

Posted at 8:44AM on Jul 15th 2009 by Lucinda

66. lol... I thought she said Michael never honored their agreement???? Now that he has died, she wants to ppretend the he was paying her all along??? Make up your mind Debbie. What she is really saying is- Micheal and I made another financial agreement, and Michael stopped paying me because it was not spousal support, but an agreement that she couldnt discuss the marriage. Michael gave her 8.5 million and a new hom and an S.U.V upon divorce, and she was to get another 2-million, but Michael stopped paying that, because she was opening her mouth. Now she wants to pretend it was spousal support, and is using this to mentally black-mail his family with the kids. She should at least keep it real..

Posted at 8:56AM on Jul 15th 2009 by Jazz

67. THIS WOMAN IS A JOKE! THOSE KIDS DON'T WANT TO BE WITH HER, THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW HER!

Posted at 9:03AM on Jul 15th 2009 by Ashlee

68. I'm not sure if she should get custody. Just because she's the bio mom, doesn't mean she deserves to have them. I don't buy the whole she didn't know what she was doing thing. She knew exactly what she was doing when she let Michael keep her kids in exchange for money. Who was the one who fed those kids as babies? Michael. Who was the one who got up in the middle of the night with them? Michael. He did EVERYTHING for those kids. And those are Debbie Rowe's words. But if she does get custody, it is going to take a long time for those kids to come around. How is she going to explain why she hasn't been a part of their lives? I just hope she will allow the Jacksons to still be a part of their lives. Katherine will let her have visitations if she gets to keep custody so I hope that Rowe would do the same.

Posted at 1:44PM on Jul 15th 2009 by mommyof3

69. You guys are ragging on her....DUH!!!!! 1-THE KIDS ARE NOT HERS BIOLOGICALLY NOR ARE THEY MJ"S BIOLOGICAL KIDS.2 - ROWE AND MJ HAD BUSINESS DEAL LEGALY BOUND BY A CONTRACT THAT SHE WOULD MARRY (IN NAME ONLY) AND SURROGATE SOME KIDS FOR HIM.3-HER FEEE AFTER TWO SURROGATAATIONS WAS 8.4 MILLION DOLLARS.It was not a marriage. It was a businessdeal. She has really lived up to her contrat-no pics of the kids in her house,no visits to the kids,etc. COMMON SENSE-wht woman would have 2 kids for MNJ.What woman would have two kids for anyone superrich and not want them?that is a golddiggers dream to have kids ,money,for a moneyman.

Posted at 9:19AM on Jul 15th 2009 by Kazemi Family files lawsuit

70. Look it is very simple
the woman is a Parasite. She never wanted the kids to begin with, She gave them up originally, for a few million bucks. Then when the molestation trial began, she greedily saw another opportunity to milk Micheal for more cash, which she did. She treated the kids like used clothing, bargaining them like a commodity for every penny they were worth. She got what? 13 million dollars over the last 15 yrs? which she used to buy a ranch or something

So now here we are , she sees Michael has died. Hmmmm.
She doesnt say much.

Then they reveal the will specifically excludes her. The next day, she comes out in the papers DEBBIE SAYS , I WANT MY KIDS
hmmmmm

Sounds good huh? What a caring mom, wants to keep her kids from the Mean old Jackson Dad. Ahh what a loving caring mommy. Then an hour after she makes this statement,l her attorney gives another statement, saying, Wait oh umm, Debbie is not sure what she will do.

Ok So then the custody hearing was supposed to be on a certain date, where she could GET HER KIDS, according to her. She and the Jacksons postpone it for a week/. Hmm wonder why. Ahhh all the sudden we hear about the emails her friend is willing to show claiming that there is a secret 4 million dollar agreement for her to give up the kids one last time, and then SHUT HER MOUTH AND GO AWAY FOREVER.

OOPS, didnt mean for that to get out to the general public. Immediately her attorney issues a statement saying THIS IS NOT TRUE SHE WOULD NEVER AGREE TO THAT. ( no matter she already accepted millions of dollars TWICE for doing exactly the same thing)

See it does not look too good for the greedy mom to be accepting MILLIONS OF DOLLARS AGAIN...................TO DUMP HER KIDS LIKE TRASH

Quick go issue denials to the press, DEMAND THAT THE NEWSPAPERS RETRACT THEIR STORYS, ..........sorry the newspapers are standing by their story, and the jackson family members are also confirming that the story is true
\
Can you find a more dispicable person on the planet? Poor kids is all I have to say
first their dad dies, then their "mom" tries to sell them again

pathetic excuse for a human being DEBBIE ROWE

Posted at 9:15AM on Jul 15th 2009 by mack

71. How do we know if Debbie Row did not have MJ sedative to make him sign the agreement that she should get the amount of money she is getting and will continue to get. You have to remember that she was giving him injections too.

She should not get a dime.

Posted at 3:29PM on Jul 15th 2009 by GWENNIE

72. I think not being involved for 12 years says it all. I won't even open the door to visitation. Why? So she use the children to keep coming back for money again and again?

Posted at 9:29AM on Jul 15th 2009 by Debbie

73. “Rebecca White, a close friend of Debbie Rowe”

A close friend???
More like a former friend.
This article says more about Rebecca White than it does about Debbie Rowe.

What a loser “friend”.

Posted at 9:43AM on Jul 15th 2009 by RipleyFan

74. What hate there is out there - - how pathetic. None of you know the real story, yet you are all ready to hang her. Can no onc accept that this woman was a part of MJ's life as dear, close friend?? That she admits she is not maternal, but did it for Michael, and to know that he would see that she was financially secure in return? Sure, it's a hard reality that children are born this way, but he was enormously wealthy at the time, and the amount that she received/is receiving is still pretty paltry in comparison.
Think about the thousands of dollars people pay to adopt from foreign countries. Think about wealthy people who seem to get to the front of the line to adopt white baby boys.....?
Wake up, people, it's a hard world sometimes. but for these two people, it was a friendly business deal. She did nothing to hurt Michael or the Jackson family. It will all come out in the wash that she is NOT avaricious. News paps and tabloids are mostly to blame for the whole bruhaha. Such yellow effing journalism!! And you idiots are lapping it up like cream.

Posted at 9:49AM on Jul 15th 2009 by curious!

75. ALL HAS BEEN SAID ABOUT THIS WOMAN, JUST PLAIN LOW LIFE AND A TERRIBLE PERSON. SHE WANTED TO 'GIVE' MICHEAEL CHILDREN, THE MORE PHOTOS COME OUT OF THE DR. THE MORE MICHAELS OLDEST SON LOOKS LIKE HIM, HIS DAUGHTER LOOKS LIKE THE "MOM" AND LITTLE BLANKET, HE RESEMBLES MICHAEL. IF THIS IS THE CASE IT WILL BE SAD THERE IS NO MICHAEL JACKSON BLOOD TO CARRY ON.............

Posted at 9:51AM on Jul 15th 2009 by cathy b