Debbie Rowe Sues over Alleged White Lies

61.
1) If she only wanted money she would have got a lot more. She got chump change as far as hollywood is concerned. She did it out of love and friendship

2)Michael loved her at least as a friend when they made the babies. Get over it. He saw good things in her. If she was a fame hungry person or using him for money she would have been talking about him and got much more.

3) Whatever agreement they had is changed now that he has died. She is the bio mom so she can go after them and I pray she does.

Posted at 8:39PM on Jul 16th 2009 by go debbie

62. DEBBI IS MONEY HUNGRY, EVERY ONE ALREADY KNOWS IT, AND LET DEBBIE HAVE THE KIDS AND THE JACKSON SHOULD SUE AND CLAIM MICHAEL IS NOT THE BIO DAD SO, HE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO GIVE THEM THE MONEY, ALSO MICHAEL PAID HER FOR THE KIDS, SHE SHOULD GIVE THAT MONEY BACK, STOP LISTENING TO THE TRAILER TRASH WHO WANT HER TO GET THE KIDS AND MONEY, THE JACKSON FAMILY ARE STABLE AND VERY CAPABLE OF BRINGING THOSE KIDS UP NORMAL

Posted at 9:31PM on Jul 16th 2009 by money hungry

63. Very simply put ROWE is a HOE, she is a sell out took $$$ the 1st time from MJ to stay away and now that MJ is gone she wantes to extort more $$....

No one ever gets that much to spread thier legs !!!!!!

Posted at 1:48PM on Jul 18th 2009 by bob

64. #23 AND THE LAST THING THOSE KIDS NEED TO BE LEFT WITH IS A DEAD BEAR MOM WHO DOESN'T GIVE TWO SH..ITS ABOUT THEM..SO THEY SHOULD REMAIN WITH KATHERINE WHO THEY'RE ARE ALREADY ATTACHED TO!WHY TAKE THEM AWAY FROM HER AND PLACE THEM WITH A STRANGER WHO GAVE BIRTH TO THEM BUT NEVER CARED ARE DID CRAP FOR THEM....SO AGAIN I SUGGEST YOU OPEN YOUR FU..CK!NG EYES AND EARS...IDIOT!

Posted at 8:41PM on Jul 16th 2009 by NICE

65. #23 AND THE LAST THING THOSE KIDS NEED TO BE LEFT WITH IS A DEAD BEAT SO CALLED ''MOTHER'' WHO DOESN'T GIVE TWO SH..ITS ABOUT THEM..SO THEY SHOULD REMAIN WITH KATHERINE WHO THEY'RE ARE ALREADY ATTACHED TO!WHY TAKE THEM AWAY FROM HER AND PLACE THEM WITH A STRANGER WHO GAVE BIRTH TO THEM BUT NEVER CARED ARE DID CRAP FOR THEM....SO AGAIN I SUGGEST YOU OPEN YOUR FU..CK!NG EYES AND EARS...IDIOT!

Posted at 8:42PM on Jul 16th 2009 by NICE

66. Beginning to like her. Debbie dont play!

Posted at 9:53PM on Jul 17th 2009 by bebefj123

67. she`d like to have the kidz to get some stories to sell!!!!

She `d run from TV STATION to TV STATION:
"ladies and gentlemen - please welcome a foreign mummy with her foreign kidz......"
"she has got the kidz who can tell us everything...."


poor kidz:
" come on, my loving kidz ! - what was daddy doing every day through?....."
Like in an interrogation.....she would ask about everything...... she would run from doc to doc with the kidz, to tell the puplic, that the kidz`s got the same probs as MJ......etc,etc......she would make everything puplic....... and step by step she would riun their life....

only stress for the kidz!!!!!

Posted at 8:48PM on Jul 16th 2009 by cm

68. She doesn't deserve them kids.let's not forget she sold them two times already,not only that but even said they weren't her kids.....So to take them kids aways from their family (mj's family) would deeply hurt them even more...and about michael not being the kids bio dad,SO WHAT! He's been there for them since day one,took care of them and loved them....where has debbie fat ass has been? On her ranch taking care of her horses not trying to see about her kids.i guess them horses are alot more important to her than prince and paris...DAMN SHAME!

Posted at 8:46PM on Jul 16th 2009 by Go Katherine! Go Katherine! Go Katherine! Go Katherine! haha

69. 49. If Debbie Rowe were as money hungry as some believe, don't ya think she would look like a million bucks instead of the lady next door?? She probably never thought she would be in this situation. She obviously has a lot to consider now.
------------------------------
Truly awesome to read a post by someone....who thinks!

Posted at 8:46PM on Jul 16th 2009 by Penny

70. E-Mails can easily be proven. If Rowe did write them, she's crazy to sue.

Posted at 8:49PM on Jul 16th 2009 by wong@frog.cc

71. Joe Jackson says he sees performer potential in Michael's kids; sweet, or kind of gross?
Jul 10, 2009, 01:47 PM | by Leah Greenblatt

Categories: Michael Jackson, News, Things that make us uncomfortable

Today in a Good Morning America interview (watchable here) with 79-year-old family patriarch Joe Jackson, interviewer Chris Connelly asks whether he sees any performer potential in Michael's three children. Joe's response? "I keep watching Paris, she maybe wants to do something, you know. And Blanket, he can really dance, that's what they're saying. He can really dance."

It's nice, in one sense, to have their grandfather forge a connection between the singing and dancing genius of his son and the perhaps-blossoming talents of his grandchildren, but it also feels a little .. too soon.

Especially since Joe has already demonstrated a distinct lack of couth, pitching the launch of his record label on the BET Awards red carpet only days after Michael's death, and is well-known for his hard-driving ways with the Jackson 5 -- and Michael in particular -- in their youth.

What do you think, readers? Michael purposefully kept his children's lives low-profile -- even their faces were rarely seen or photographed in public -- until his passing, and now they are very much in the spotlight, through no choice of their own.

Should any natural entertaining talents they have be developed, or is it grossly inappropriate to even discuss something like that while they are very much still grieving for the loss of the father? If Prince Michael, 12, Paris, 11, and Blanket, 7, are indeed left in Joe and Katherine Jackson's care full-time, will their entering showbusiness in some capacity be inevitable?

More from EW's Music Mix:
Rumor Patrol: Ashlee Simpson is NOT making Michael Jackson covers album
Which city has inspired the best songs?
Michael Jackson talks Bad, price of fame in unreleased 1987 interview
Michael Jackson memorial: Which performance moved you most?

Posted at 9:09PM on Jul 16th 2009 by ihatejoejackson

72. Is this the pot calling the kettle black? Can those of you who are name calling, please stop. Regardless of the way you feel about this woman, she is the children's mother. You are not honoring MJ by calling his former wife and the mother of his children names. I understand US Magazine is saying the children want to stay with their aunt Janet.

Posted at 8:49PM on Jul 16th 2009 by questionmarc

73. PEOPLE DO YOU NOT READ CURRENT EVENTS PAPERS THIS PAST YEAR A BLACK COUPLE HAD A SET OF TWINS ONE BLACK ONE WHITE THE TWINS WERE TESTED THEY WERE BIOLOGICALLY LINKED TO THE BLACK DAD AND BLACK MOM. LOOK AT SOME OF THE PICS OF MICHAEL AND SOME OF A VERY YOUNG PRINCE MICHAEL. THOSE KIDS ARE MJ'S

Posted at 8:54PM on Jul 16th 2009 by been in love with MJ since 1971

74. i love you mike,i don't like they way nancy grace is dogging him atfer his death i hope his children are not allow to watch the news or t.v. she is ridding him still. she's a loud mouth and her guest is afraid of her . love you mike an her kids

Posted at 9:03PM on Jul 16th 2009 by mary

75. 57. E-Mails can easily be proven. If Rowe did write them, she's crazy to sue.

Posted at 8:49PM on Jul 16th 2009 by wong@frog.cc

ANYONE CAN CUT AND PASTE

Posted at 8:56PM on Jul 16th 2009 by been in love with MJ since 1971