Why is Michael's Mom Mounting Legal Challenge?

Michael Jackson's MomSources connected to Michael Jackson's family tell us some family members as well as lawyers for the estate are ticked off at some legal eagles who may be trying to start a legal war.

Attorneys Londell McMillan and Burt Levitch do not represent Michael's estate -- they represent Katherine Jackson personally. They filed legal papers Friday asking a judge to rule if Katherine can object to the appointment of the executors named in Michael's will and still collect the money her son left her.

Here's the issue. There's a "no contest" clause in the will, meaning anyone who files objections to the will automatically gets no money. McMillan and Levitch want to know if the "no contest" clause would apply if Katherine only objects to the executors Michael chose.

Here's what's bugging some family members and the lawyers representing the estate ... the will gives Katherine 40% of Michael's estate, so she can't be upset about that. The will names Katherine guardian for the children .. again, that's what she wants. And the named executors -- John Branca and John McClain -- are Michael's longtime, trusted advisors and friends.

So why would Katherine object to the will or the executors? A lot of people who are in the middle of it all feel Katherine is being manipulated and doesn't really understand the implications of mounting a legal challenge.

So why are McMillan and Levitch kicking up dust?

Stay tuned...


Michael jackson Launch photos

Tags: challenge, john branca, john mcclain, JohnBranca, JohnMcclain, katherine jackson, KatherineJackson, londell mcmillan, LondellMcmillan, michael jackson, MichaelJackson, no contest clause, NoContestClause, probate, will, will contest, WillContest

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 49 of 49) Previous 15 Comments

721. Katherine Jackson doesn't need any more $$$$$ and CONTROL -- the Jehovah's Witnesses just worked my neighborhood and left flyers that say: "How Can You Survive The End Of The World? -- You Are Warmly Invited To Come And Listen To The Answer." Same old bizarre crap, just like the Jacksons. If the end of the world is nigh, aka Armageddon, I don't think another Jackson fracas will make two bits of difference.

Posted at 2:58PM on Jul 21st 2009 by Saultxyca

722. I am a mom, and blood relation is over any other relations,that is why Katherine should mount a legal challenge. Why should others have a hand over Michaels Jackson's property? For what? Were they there when he was concieved, grew up and mastered his craft to earn those millions? What was their contribution that makes Michael Jackson decided to simply award them on their lap everything he worked hard for? Is it like blessings falling freely from the sky? or plain and simple perfect Luck! What a Joke!

Posted at 11:44PM on Jul 22nd 2009 by Lawrence

723. She is being manipulated by the Lawyers and Joe Jackson. no matter what He''s still her husband. doesn't matter what we think she still has some feelings for him. He can still come in and get some of that money ..........IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY RIGHT NOW. and as much as I'd like to see Mike's will honored. I'd be kinda if Rowe got the kids...JUST TO SPITE JOE AND THE GREEDY JACKSON'S ( THE ONES THAT ARE GREEDY)

Posted at 6:22AM on Jul 28th 2009 by dogcatcher

724. God Bless you, Kathering. You deserve the utmost reverance and respect. I'm praying that you will make it through this. Couple words of advice: Pray and stop listening to Joe Jackson's twisted ass.

Posted at 10:12AM on Jul 23rd 2009 by blackpepp

725. get a grip. all MJever was to this family was a cash cow

Posted at 7:28PM on Jul 23rd 2009 by mrmsmop

726. Michael's business should cease being aired so the airheads who are speculating about what going to happen and what is not will go away ... Leave the Family be ...MYOB .. Rest In Peace Michael... you will always be loved ..

Posted at 6:41PM on Jul 23rd 2009 by Dorothy Moore

727. Let's hope that the judge makes a clause that whoever gets the kids and control of their 40
% makes some of that money go into a trust fund for when they are older and that some of Michael's items are not all auctioned or sold off and saved for the kids.

Posted at 8:20AM on Jul 25th 2009 by butterpie7172

728. I AM JUST WONDERING WHY KATHERINE IS SO WORRIED ABOUT THAT MUCH MONEY AT HER AGE? THAT IS MORE THAN SHE CAN POSSIBLY SPEND FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE? I AGREE WITH EVERYONE, SOMEONE IS BEHIND ALL OF THIS, AND ITS NOT KATHERINE!!!!

Posted at 10:33AM on Jul 25th 2009 by MAGGY

729. because joe is telling her what to do and he was always more important then her own children so thats why now here is what i want to know how is she getting a SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK WHEN THE REST OF THE WORLD MUST work for there few pennies a month they get and trust she is getting a nice check they need to give her nothing if she doesnt want her son left her and there is no reason for her to get money now she will recive a nice size check for the three children from the state because of the income michael had they will take care of them till they are 18 tell joe rout in hell

Posted at 10:59AM on Jul 25th 2009 by denise

730. Money, money, money... the parents, advisosr - it is about the money. if they carried about Michael , where were they when he need help.

His kids do not deserve to be alone, but they are alone because of his drug use. He chose drugs over his career and kids. Please do not make him a hero....

Posted at 2:26PM on Jul 26th 2009 by liss

731. A will is the wishes of the person who had it prepared by a legal staff, and is Not to be challenged, especially with that clause in it..The Greedyassed Jackson family has always used Michael and abused him...Yes, His mother allowed the abuse , so she was an en-abler to all the hell and torment Joe Jackson subjected his children to. She basically has control of 80% of all Michael spent his life making, and , now, she wants more? Vultures circling to see how much deeper they can pick his bones. Michael trusted these attorneys to handle his affairs, and his wishes,,If he had wanted Kathering or another Jackson family member on the panel, he would have specified that too..Anything that Katherine can get, Joe can too. Michael knew this, so...Jacksons back off and let the people do what they are supposed to do..I betmnone of the Jacksons can balance a checkbook! So, where is their expertise needed? My wish is this, those children were the most important treasure to Michael, he trusted Katherine to take care of them, right? He also gave her 40% of everything, so she needs to take care of those children and keep out of legal affairs that she has no idea how to manage...She and Joe never had anything, went bankrupt, Michael bailed them out, and now, she and all the other Jackson's and grandchildren are living in Michael's home, and he will always keep paying. Joe Jackson is behind everything Katherine says. Those children will be pressured same as Joe did to his kids,,and another group of lives will be ruined. They can never have any kind of 'normalcy', or childhood as long as the Jackson's are in control.

Posted at 6:15PM on Aug 8th 2009 by Liza

732. One more post on this site...all of Michaels family is as much to blame as any doctor for his problems..And, for them All to say they never 'saw' him take drugs is ignorant..You don't have to 'see' it, to know it..Remember all the different drugs, different names that were found at Neverland?? And, if none of the family 'knew this' why are some saying they 'tried' to intervene and were pushed away? See, this is all BS, because if any of you cared at all about Michael (as the person), you would not have stopped until the problem was taken care of, right? But, its easy to not 'see' anything , because he was taking care of the 'family' financialy, and you sure didnt want that to stop, right? I know a little bit about addiction..my husband was an addict and was about dead, I took the 'tough love' method, and did Not back up, I did Not stop until he could function as a human again even with him pushing me away..If you really cared, as you all say you do, you would Not have stopped,,until Michael was well..This is a sickness, and it has to be cured, not pushed aside. My husband is well and a happy man now..and I certainly did not have the money the Jackson's have to handle this. Michael needed Love..and, he didnt get it from his family..

Posted at 6:27PM on Aug 8th 2009 by Liza

733. Come on guys.
Branca isn't making any good decisions. At least not for Mike!
Branca betrayed him together with Sony years ago.

Just look at the memorabilia-tour! The estate will get 4million at the max? for a 2 year run? That's laughable. People overseas will storm that kind of exibiton. You could bring it everywhere and people would be interested.
Kathrine is damn right by saying, that the extate could generate much more money on that.
She also criticized that they never contracted that out. They just took the offer from AEG. Noone would act like that.

And what about the movie? ok, the cashed in, but the allowed Sony to forbid a tribute concert in London around that time, because it would interfere....And what is Sony doing now?? They announce the film will only run 2 weeks in cinemas, so they don't need to give any money for advertising.
I strongly think that neither Sony nor Branca are interested in generating the maximum cash for MJs estate.
For them THATs the way to get control over the whole ATV-catalogue one day (because the estate will have to sell it, so that they can pay the depts).
They failed on getting this by sabotaging Mike and his Invincible album. But I guess they will succeed sometime in the future.

Posted at 11:30PM on Aug 24th 2009 by Markus

Previous 15 Comments