Larry B & Dannielynn -- Swingers

'lol Only when confronted with callousness and stu-PI-dity..:) "


lol , which is each time you look in the" DISCUSTING" mirror ...:(

"DISCUSTING' is a word this stern fan made up it means ; sternies are crusty . so, anyways

No wonder RT opposed the motion. Sheesh. Page 7 is all about shilling against AH on the website.

I think I have seen just about everything now. This one takes the cake. How much can the TRUTH REVEAL in these cases, and especially this crazy blogger case.

Defendant turning against defendant and ratting them out on behalf of the plaintiff; 'cooperating' with dilatory tactics of adding defendants long after the fact of the statute of limitations; collusion (which the judge claims is 'legal.' LOL.

Then her comes da judge:

EVERY SINGLE DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS-- DENIED as a matter of course; no legal explanation, no intellectual discourse of legal back and forth and NORMALCY of 'debate' at a hearing--just shut up and sit down--DENIED DENIED.

This lunacy is one for the textbooks: To all law students--LEARN how to use and abuse the legal system, cut throats figuratively of your opponents; insult and disrespect your defendants, chew them up and spit them out; and last, LEARN HOW TO LOSE A CASE>

ANS and HKS Grifters

What exactly did Stern do as Anna's Lawyer and Mgr ?

Let's see ;

1. Stole Pierce Marshall's Sealed Financial's off
Rusty Hardin's Council table in a Court of Law.

2. Had (cough) sexual relations with his one and only Client, violating a fiduciary trust. HKS had a contract w/ANS for 6% of Marshall Money and named Executor in her Will. Major ethics violation no no !

3. Arranged Interviews and other Media gigs for ANS so she could show the world what a strung out "junkie" she was.

4. Negt. the contract for the infamous Anna Nicole Show !

5. Negt. Contract with TrimSpa, by where Anna lost weight from Lipo suction and other extreme
procedures to commit Consumer Product "fraud".

6. Intimately involved in trying to steal a Mansion in the Bahamas from the legitimate owners.

7. Fraudently signed DL's Birth Certificate. Voluntarily participated in witholding a child from her bio-dad. Yes, he knew LB was the bio-dad, all he had to do is take one look at DL after she was born to know she could not be his child. Although he and ANS knew prior that it was LB, whole reason for fleeing to Bahamas in the first place.

8. Procuring and administering dangerous RX narcotics and Benzo's to a known addict even while pregnant and filmed her stoned/drugged out.

9. Lived off a single Mother with a child for 10 years, he testified she bought his shoes and he had to even ask to buy cigarettes with ANS money.

10. Trying for 10 years to rob the Marshall Family of their Estate Inheritance.

11. Committed "Perjury" while under Oath in multiple Jurisdictions.

etc, etc,

What a stering character resume ?

Perhaps if he would apply for a job as a "Professional Grifter" instead of an Attorney position he would have better sucess at gainful employment.
_____________________________________

T.

TS Motion for Continuance

http://www.mediafire.com/file/nvdm1nrybaw/Motion for Continuance Einy Special Appear Dismiss Exhibits Blog TC.pdf

Motion for Continuance Exhibits

http://www.mediafire.com/file/nvdm1nrybaw/Motion for Continuance Einy Special Appear Dismiss Exhibits Blog TC.pdf

http://www.mediafire.com/file/nvdm1nrybaw/Motion for Continuance Einy Special Appear Dismiss Exhibits Blog TC.pdf

Posted at 2:06PM on Sep 5th 2009 by Jurisdictional Discovery



WRONG LINK

TS Motion for Continuance

http://www.mediafire.com/file/mmnznzzgrdy/MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFF CAROLYN O COS CHANGE SIGNED.pdf

We now see 3 Writs of Mandamus each with Motions for Emergency Relief in the 1st COA:

Case Number: 01-09-00771-CV
Date Filed: 9/4/2009
Style: In re Art Harris

Case Number: 01-09-00699-CV
Date Filed: 8/10/2009
Style: In re Teresa Stephens

Case Number: 01-09-00438-CV
Date Filed: 5/18/2009
Style: In re Howard K. Stern

As discussed previously at length, the common argument is that Judge Lindsay’s Motions to Compel are unlawful under TX law and an abuse of her discretion. Lindsay has skipped over usual and customary hearings and arguments despite having all of the information provided now to the COA by 3 different defendants repeatedly brought to her attention.

The only legal relief these 3 defendants have in the baseless and fraudulent ‘bloggers’ case is to appeal to higher authorities praying they will enforce TX law.

SheStone



I haven't finished going through the Writ completely yet.

I notice that they tend to conviently forget or purposefully omit the conspiracy part of the case.

The way they leave certain facts out and mistate things is very disceptive.IMO

I can't wait to read McCabe's response.

I haven't read QV's article yet either.

But it is time for me to go. I will check back maybe later or tomorrow.

Everyone have a great weekend.

JMO

-______________________

T.

Predictions


Art will not be granted an Emergency Stay and the Writ will be denied.

The time for Art to object to the Special Masters Appointment has long past, not to mention that he has already surrendered electronic media to Ball.

No Do Overs !

_____________________

T.

Smoke and Mirrors wrote:


My question is WTH has Jackson Walker been doing since they filed an Appearance for Art on 2/2/09 ?
Why did they wait until Sept. 09' to file a Mandamus objecting to the appointment of a Special Master on 1/27/09?
I believe the COA will be asking the same question.

McCabe Sizzles wrote:


hahaha...I guess they were hoping the few items he turned over would be enough, and they must have been fervently hoping that three foot stack of emails McCabe has of Turner and Art were just a figment of his imagination.

IMO, since they waited so late, this falls under the "wasting the courts time, make them pay" rule.

_________________

T.

• AH/Bush have been on a different track than HKS/Wood.

AH and his people gave Lindsay the benefit of the doubt for a much longer period of time then HKS did. AH likely (reasonably at the time) thought that the Judge would read his papers and conduct hearings. After all, AH was to have only turned over hard copies of requested docs with a privilege log; Ogden of his behalf never agreed to turning over electronic media (EM) or to the appointment of Ball as anything other than a forensic examiner (Ogden submitted an affidavit saying such).

McCabe slips by an order that the Judge signs ordering AH to turn over EM and to establish Ball as a Special Master anyway. Under threat of a contempt order from the willing 280th, AH turns over his EM and expects that the Court will do right by him after the fact.

Well, AH then sees his personal files being talked about publicly by a 'Special Master' who is an employee and advocate of VA (as the docs show) and a clear adversary of AH and other defendants (rather than a 'neutral' person). The 'bloggers' cases is after all a data-mining operation and we would expect that as happened with the stolen EM from 'Horizons' that came to be unlawfully in the hands of VA's lawyers, other people's private EM would also make its way to the blogs.

• VA can't prove defamation much less a conspiracy among strangers to do something that never happened.

VA swore in papers for Cosby's case that she couldn't say if ANS had been sexually abused while a child; VA however did confirm she whipped ANS with a belt as a child. VA couldn't prove defamation with the 'Mommie Dearest' case where the publication of the alleged defamation was witnessed by a stunned global audience. Whomever read the TMZ story (and understands English) understood perfectly well what it said; a substantially if not literally true story said McCabe in Houston's Federal Court.

• So VA has never shown the Court any defamatory publications.

She has never shown Bahamian Judges were swayed because of the TMZ story and any postings on comment boards (the contrary is true in fact - the Bahamian Judges literally tossed O'Q and his lawyers and their blog print-outs out of the Court room). She can't possibly show that CA Judges who may at some time in the future hear her case for visitation (highly unlikely since she hasn't filed in three years) would be unable to discharge their duties because of a TMZ story. No defamation, no damages to VA's due process or legal rights = the vexatious 'bloggers' case. With no defamatory publications having been identified it is irrelevant what bloggers may have been emailing each other privately.

• As Judge Chin said, Cosby was ‘reckless’ to have printed anything she heard from VA

(and from every other member of the TX cabal for that matter). CBS alone could file Federal Court docs in the 280th that show VA was not defamed; rather, she did the defaming for money and cannot back up a single claim she made against HKS and neither can McCabe. A treasure load of additional materials to augment that argument will soon emerge into the public realm from the Cosby case whenever Judge Chin disposes of Cosby’s latest Hail Mary Motion and moves the case along. Devastating information is also coming from the SC/North Georgia cases. The defamer and her nefarious team claiming defamation (based on petty concerns about print articles) while they stormed TV, the blogs and published a book with heinous lies and criminal accusations offends society and the law.

Mary Flood's latest article:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/chronicle/6603599.html

Coe attorney seeks IDs behind online comments

http://theparisnews.com/story.lasso?ewcd=8c57363d0d5d13de

Leshers’ battle with bloggers continues

By Bill Hankins
The Paris News

Published September 2, 2009

"“This is going to be a precedent setting case,” she said."

1415. Mary Flood's latest article:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/chronicle/6603599.html

Coe attorney seeks IDs behind online comments

Posted at 9:52AM on Sep 6th 2009 by Surprise, surprise
*****
Coe's Attorney (Bert Steinmann) has learned something from his former adversary:

By HARVEY RICE
The Houston Chronicle
May 6, 2004

A federal lawsuit accuses a former law school professor, known for his public commentary on legal issues, of forcing a former student to have sex, sodomizing her and threatening to share her sexually with other faculty members.

The accusations led the faculty of the South Texas College of Law to vote last year to recommend that the board of directors strip Neil McCabe, 56, of his tenure, college President and Dean James Alfini said.
...
The lawsuit by student Kimmy Fox Fredericks, 31, says college officials "were aware of McCabe's nature as a sexual predator of his female students."
...
The lawsuit, filed April 23, claims discrimination and harassment under Title IX of the 1972 federal Education Amendment and seeks an unspecified amount in damages from the college and McCabe.

McCabe filed a defamation of character lawsuit Jan. 15 in state civil court accusing Fredericks of stalking him after he broke off their sexual relationship.

McCabe and his wife, Kay Peterson, who is representing him in the defamation case, could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

Peterson wrote a letter dated Jan. 20 to Bert Steinmann, the attorney representing Fredericks in the defamation lawsuit, threatening to move forward with the defamation lawsuit unless Fredericks rescinded her threat to sue.

"If she thought we were bluffing, we assume she has been disabused of that notion," the letter says. "If she does not want to expose herself, her family and friends to discovery, she must do as requested."

Steinmann said, "I don't believe it is the normal course of business to file a lawsuit to make someone not file a lawsuit."
...

Coe's Attorney (Bert Steinmann) has learned something from his former adversary:

Posted at 1:04PM on Sep 6th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean

Thanks! I hadn't notice the tie there--Houston's 'small world' (the legal system). Houston media is filled with stories about corrupt judges, an overtaxed system, public defenders handling too many cases and bleary-eyed from it all. You can even watch video of one judge from the Harris County court on trial NOW for sexual harassment of a defendant!! Lots and lots of media in Houston.

cannot back up a single claim she made against HKS and neither can McCabe.

Posted at 1:37AM on Sep 6th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean


Overt Act 3

On 9/12/06, with NO LEGITIMATE MEDICAL PURPOSE, SANDEEP KAPOOR
prescribed two separate prescriptions for hydromorphone, a controlled
substance, to Michelle Chase, intended for ANNA NICOLE SMITH.

Overt Act 11

On 9/22/06, after being warned of the danger of such controlled
substances, SANDEEP KAPOOR prescribed control substances to Michelle
Chase, intended for ANNA NICOLE SMITH.


Overt Act 12

On 9/22/06, with no NO LEGITIMATE MEDICAL PURPOSE, SANDEEP KAPOOR
prescribed hydromorphone, a controlled substance, to Michelle Chase,
intended for ANNA NICOLE SMITH.


Overt Act 13

On 9/22/06, with no NO LEGITIMATE MEDICAL PURPOSE, KHRISTINE
EROSHEVICH prescribed clonazepam, a controlled substance, and
carisoprodol to Wesley Irwin, intended for ANNA NICOLE SMITH.


Overt Act 14

On 9/22/06, with no NO LEGITIMATE MEDICAL PURPOSE, KHRISTINE
EROSHEVICH prescribed chloral hydrate and clonazepam, controlled
substances, and carisoprodol to Howard K. Stearn, intended for ANNA
NICOLE SMITH.


Overt Act 15

On 9/22/06, with NO LEGITIMATE MEDICAL PURPOSE, KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH
prescribed chloral hydrate, a controlled substance, to Howard Stern,
intended for ANNA NICOLE SMITH.

-----------------

Overt Act 2

Between 6/5/04 and 6/22/04, KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH prescribed
controlled substances to Vicki Marshall, for no legitimate medical
purpose, from a pharmacy in Los Angeles County, California.

-----------------

Overt Act 3

On 8/24/04, HOWARD K STERN picked up a controlled substance for Vicki
Marshall, who was NOT A PATIENT of KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH, which were
intended for ANNA NICOLE SMITH, from a pharmacy in Los Angeles
County, California.


Overt Act 4

On 8/28/04, HOWARD K STERN picked up a controlled substance for Vicki
Marshall, who was NOT A PATIENT of KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH, which were
intended for ANNA NICOLE SMITH, from a pharmacy in Los Angeles
County, California.


Overt Act 5

Between 10/19/04 and 1/28/06, KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH prescribed
controlled substances to ANNA NICOLE SMITH, who was NOT A PATIENT of
KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH, from a pharmacy in Los Angeles County,
California.


Overt Act 6

Between 10/19/04 and 1/28/06, KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH prescribed
controlled substances to ANNA NICOLE SMITH, for no NO LEGITIMATE
MEDICAL PURPOSE, from a pharmacy in Los Angeles County, California.


Overt Act 7

On 1/25/05, HOWARD K STERN picked up a controlled substance for ANNA
NICOLE SMITH, who was NOT A PATIENT of KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH, from a
pharmacy in Los Angeles County, California.


Overt Act 8

Between April 29, 2005 and September 4, 2005, KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH
prescribed carisoprodol five (5) times to ANNA NICOLE SMITH, who was
NOT A PATIENT of KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH.


Overt Act 9

Between 6/21/06 and 1/25/07, KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH prescribed
controlled substances to HOWARD K STERN, who was NOT A PATIENT of
KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH, from a pharmacy in Los Angeles County,
California.


Overt Act 10

Between 6/21/06 and 1/25/07, KHRISTINE EROSHEVICH prescribed
controlled substances to HOWARD K STERN, for no NO LEGITIMATE MEDICAL
PURPOSE, from a pharmacy in Los Angeles County, California.