Larry Birkhead is on the stand in the preliminary hearing involving Anna Nicole Smith and the defendants who allegedly fueled her drug habit.
Birkhead just testified between August 2004 and May 2006, he saw Anna take the following drugs regularly: Topamax, Lasix, Klonopin, Valium, Xanax, Potassium and Methadone.
He has not talked about whether Howard K. Stern or the two other defendants -- Sandeep Kapoor and Kristine Eroshevich -- helped facilitate Anna's drug use, but he did identify Dr. Kapoor as Smith's regular physician at the time.
UPDATE 3:20 PM ET -- Birkhead testified he saw Anna's prescription bottles with several different names on them: Anna Nicole Smith, Michelle Chase, Vicki Marshall and Jane Brown. Larry also said the whole time he knew Anna he was concerned that she would take her meds inappropriately.
UPDATE 5:50 PM ET -- Birkhead testified he never saw anyone force Anna to take medication. He said he saw Anna with a duffel bag full of meds. Birkhead said he saw Stern give the bag to Anna Nicole, but didn't see him administer any drugs.
See More
Reader Comments
(Page 45 of 53) Previous 15 Comments | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | Most Recent | Next 15 Commentsi remembered one of my ideas
WHAT IF THERE WAS A REAL EMERGENCY DURING AN EMERGENCY BROADCAST TEST ? HOW WHOULD WE KNOW ?
#859 Dead junkie whore Vickie Hogan got what she deserved for all her sins and debauchery. After all, mother who gave Ecstasy and methadone to her son deserves to die and rot in hell. Plus, she tried to steal a $1 million house from the owner.
SUSAN BROWN,ESQ. IS A DEFENDANT IN SC CASE.
Who is going to pay Virgie Arthur's legal bills? Is McCabe going to work for free?
Virgie's fake defamation lawsuit is dead.
Howard learned to lie from his mom:
Virgie's fake defamation lawsuit is dead.
Posted at 2:20PM on Nov 8th 2009 by Questions
To answer your question:
Virgie's case against all who defamed her will go forward.
No need to worry your little empty head about it.
566.
Virgie's fake defamation lawsuit is dead.
Posted at 2:20PM on Nov 8th 2009 by Questions
To answer your question:
Virgie's case against all who defamed her will go forward.
No need to worry your little empty head about it.
Posted at 2:42PM on Nov 8th 2009 by Facts, Just The Facts
========
HAHAHA! LOLOL!!! it wasnt a question
It was a statement of fact.
It happens to be the truth.
Talk about empty heads! LOLOLOL --- just because you want that case with no proof of defamation to that old lady who was thrown out of ANS's life years ago with good reason --- just wont make it so! HAHAHAH!!
OMG how very funny that is!!!
The case is truly dead, no other lawyer will buy up a losing case and *absorb the over half a million that was spent* on it. The Marshall's do not have any other rich friends like O'Q to throw their money away and use it as a write off on taxes.
I actually hear the echos from your head, talk about empty!!!!
The case will not go forward and those people did not conspire anything against that horrid old selfish woman! She never was a legal threat to begin with, and now with O'Q ---SHE should worry about all of those defendants suing her azz for every cent they spent on a fake case!
===================
Posted at 2:44PM on Nov 8th 2009 by More Charges Against Stern?
NOPE, the ones they have against him now no jury on earth would follow thru and convict on. He is not a doctor, and he did not intend any harm and no one could control Anna. WISHFUL thinking on both of your parts-
528. Minor Update on SC case from today:
Docket Text: NOTICE of Cancellation of Hearing: In Camera Hearing on Motion [69] First MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney In Camera - Susan M. Brown, MOTION for Hearing, [68] First MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney In Camera Motion Hearing set for 11/3/2009 11:00 AM HAS BEEN CANCELLED.
Poor SB with no one to back her up anymore.
Posted at 11:56PM on Nov 3rd 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean
⢠SB tries again to be removed as counsel for G. Ben
To continue the update; the day after the above Hearing was cancelled; SB had G. Ben sign an affidavit for the Court. G. Ben declared that due to a âconflictâ becoming apparent with his continued representation by SB and Joye (SB was pro hac vice with the sponsorship of SC lawyer Joye) he asked that the Court allow both to withdraw as his counsel of record in the SC case. The âconflictâ was of course that SB was added as a defendant in the SC case. On 11-5-09 SB and Joye filed a joint Motion as Doc 82 with the attached affidavit of G. Ben. SB and Joye had separately filed Motions 9-30-09 to be relieved as counsel and asking for a hearing in camera to discuss the matter â without explanation or supporting materials.
What happened in between 9-30-09 and the cancellation of the hearing 11-3-09? SB was finally brought to a depo 10-5-09 (after asking the Court in SC 10-2-09 to stay her depo ordered by the N. GA Court which the SC Court denied the same day) and HKS filed a first Motion for sanctions against SB and G. Ben 10-28-09.
Recall, SB was found to be holding electronic and printed materials in her Office at the time of her depo that were copies of the stolen items from âHorizonsâ. That was in continued defiance of the SC Court as was the case when SB refused for months to hand over the USB drives containing all the files from ANSâs computer that she had âsharedâ with the OâQ Law Firm.
What ever will happen with SB?
tikkitukkatikka
da-dit-da dit dit dit da-dit dit
Aaaaaaik-Aaaaaink
my favorite duck call
Lonesome Hen :
kanckanc kanc kanc kanc kanc draw the last kanc out real slow... you need a duck caller
The whole VA thing NEVER MADE SENSE TO BEGIN WITH!!!
News flash: we are in a deep recession and most americans are fed up with bail outs and and greedy people filing meaningless cases.
565. SUSAN BROWN,ESQ. IS A DEFENDANT IN SC CASE.
Who is going to pay Virgie Arthur's legal bills? Is McCabe going to work for free?
Virgie's fake defamation lawsuit is dead.
Posted at 2:20PM on Nov 8th 2009 by Questions
Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/38#comments#ixzz0WKeWrdxv
To answer your question:
Virgie's case against all who defamed her will go forward.
No need to worry your little empty head about it.
Posted at 2:42PM on Nov 8th 2009 by Facts, Just The Facts
Have you read J.M.O'Q's will? What other law firm will buy this no money maker case and spend millions?, or please point out in his will that this case is funded. Put up or shut up empty head, He wanted in the event of his death to not have any cases go forward that could not be sold, He obviously didn't trust his own employees with his name, Shyster is as shyster does, He even shystered his own employees, High five O'Q!, can't fix shyster. Tell us how this is going to go forward and who will make sure please. TIA
shyâ
ster
ââ/ËÊaɪstÉr/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [shahy-ster] Show IPA
Use shyster in a Sentence
See web results for shyster
See images of shyster
ânoun Informal.
1. a lawyer who uses unprofessional or questionable methods.
2. a person who gets along by petty, sharp practices.
Isn't it funny that here we are years later and EVERYTHING we wished for HAS IN FACT COME TRUE ! HS is going to trial for the role he played in the deaths of ANNA NICOLE SMITH AND DANIEL her son. It shows the greatness of our legal system, though for some who have inserted themselves in this story, it is not so great news.
For the rest of the world who witnessed the outrage done it sounds like music to our ears. That the three will in fact answer to his/her HONOR for their actions . A jury will decide the accused fates. This as it should be. HS will attempt to blame the Dr.s for HIS ACTIONS but will fail in his attempt. HS ISN't a DOCTOR but he played one in REAL TIME>
Update on McCabeâs Hail Mary Pass â the silly Rule 91 âSpecial Exceptionsâ
Rather than the required â⦠exception shall not only point out the particular pleading excepted to, but it shall also point out intelligibly and with particularity the defect, omission, obscurity, duplicity, generality, or other insufficiency in the allegations in the pleading excepted to.â McCabe claims he needs the Court to order CBS to explain what it means when referring to the media storm surrounding the ANS saga. Huh? VA and OâQ were media-whoring with a fury and yet McCabe doesnât know what CBS means when it refers to same in its answer; a preposterous delay tactic.
http://www.hcdistrictclerk.com/Edocs/Public/ViewFilePage.aspx?ViewAsType=PDF&TodaysDate=12/28/2009&PublicImageNbr=44176135&CourtID=080
Then on to TMZâs Answer from 18 months ago and McCabe claiming to need to know what a âqualified privilegeâ is. Well, people who have information and share it with others are not guilty of telling lies if what they knew at one time turns out to be only partially or not at all true later if the sharing of information in the first place eventually leads to the truth coming out. News Agencies constantly publish false information during breaking stories because that is the nature of reporting; you go with what you have when you have it. Any quibbles with the real or perceived content of TMZâs stepbrother story at one time are cured by the passage of time and corroboration of the underlying facts = the âqualified privilegeâ that TMZ noted. Or as McCabe was forced to admit during a hearing for the âMommie Dearestâ Federal case, the TMZ story is âsubstantially if not literally true.â
http://www.hcdistrictclerk.com/Edocs/Public/ViewFilePage.aspx?ViewAsType=PDF&TodaysDate=12/28/2009&PublicImageNbr=44176131&CourtID=080
Stop wasting everyoneâs time McCabe. Time for settlement and cash to be discussed.
McCabe and VA at it again - McCabe wants an order for production by CBS for audio/videotapes, emails and docs that pertain to it and all of the other defendants in the phony âbloggersâ case.
FAT CHANCE â no prima facie showing by VA as required by the real law for such a motion, motion for final summary judgement already righteously submitted to the Court by CBS and, oh, 4 Writs of Mandamus pending relating to the same nonsense caused by Lindsay unlawfully ordering same against HKS, AH and TS.
http://www.hcdistrictclerk.com/Edocs/Public/ViewFilePage.aspx?ViewAsType=PDF&TodaysDate=12/28/2009&PublicImageNbr=44176133&CourtID=080
Let us hope that the new Judge is not bamboozled into allowing another one of McCabeâs lengthy âpaper trialsâ whereby McCabe/VA pile on mountains of crap with the Court necessitating responses from defendants and back and forth for months as Lindsay allowed. Or that the new Judge allows McCabe to get away with telling the Court that he âknowsâ from people who could not possibly know anything for a fact that certain âevidenceâ is out there if only the Court unlawfully orders production from here and there.
Every word of the âbloggersâ case is a lie from VA and OâQ and their henchmen from back in the day and has since been proven to be so after the successful lawsuits against OâQ and Cosby and the various depos that were developed and VAâs own miserable failure in Federal Court (âMommie Dearestâ case).
573. Isn't it funny that here we are years later and EVERYTHING we wished for HAS IN FACT COME TRUE ! HS is going to trial for the role he played in the deaths of ANNA NICOLE SMITH AND DANIEL her son. It shows the greatness of our legal system, though for some who have inserted themselves in this story, it is not so great news.
For the rest of the world who witnessed the outrage done it sounds like music to our ears. That the three will in fact answer to his/her HONOR for their actions . A jury will decide the accused fates. This as it should be. HS will attempt to blame the Dr.s for HIS ACTIONS but will fail in his attempt. HS ISN't a DOCTOR but he played one in REAL TIME>
Posted at 12:33PM on Nov 9th 2009 by Pipe DREAMs or REALITY ?
Blah, Blah, tell that to yourself over and over because you or he/she has never handed a pill to someone that a licenced Dr. has prescribed to anyone and that is illegal?, you are wrong. does that mean we all have at one time or another played Dr.?
HS and OSITO,
"November 9, 2009 Virgie Arthurâs Response to CBS Motion for Summary Judgment before the evidential part of a lawsuit."
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2631
Plus 5 other downloads, mostly exhibits along with this one above.
















