The people suing Lindsay Lohan over the 2007 chase on Pacific Coast Highway want the jury to know Lindsay was under the influence of two different types of cocaine during the wild ride ... this according to documents obtained by TMZ.
The lawyer for Tracie Rice wants the judge to tell the jury the following -- Lindsay was under the influence of coke during the chase; Sheriff's deputies found coke in her pants pocket; The coke belonged to Lindsay; Her urine sample found two types of coke.
Rice's lawyer also says, if the judge is unwilling to tell the jury about Lindsay's cocaine use, then Lindsay should be prohibited from claiming she did not ingest or possess cocaine on the night in question.
Lohan refused to answer questions about her drug use the night of the chase, asserting her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
See More
Reader Comments
(Page 1 of 6) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments
Whatever the plaintiff just wants money.
She suffered no injuries at all and it was 3 years ago
Nicole: Irrelevant... Should she be immune from prosecution because nobody was hurt ? Thats a bs excuse...
Maybe I am naive, but what is two types of cocaine? electriczipper got the answer?
If she isn't allowed to plead the fifth then she should just say she "doesn't remember" or "can't clearly recall the events of that night". If she gets jail time on July 6th she could delay the start date.
Hopefully she can beat this
yea what's the two types?? Don't really see her as a crack smoker...
What a waste of tax payers money...
that's the dumbest thing I ever heard. The Lawyer knows she can't bring up the cocaine in court because it became inadmissible due to a mistake by the sheriff's department. The Boneheads dropped it on the floor. They had no proof she took the cocaine! You can't just say I know she did it.. You have to be able to prove it and they can't. Also If they can't bring it up in court She wouldn't have to deny it... This is just a way to make the tax payers pay for a little extra money for stalling tactics on the part of the prosecution!
Page Three; Preliminary Statement...
hmmm So this all happened on July 24, 2010? Is that like a scene from Minority Report?
Pffff. The fifth amendment IS self-incrimination. We all know that.
What erks me is Lindsay's denial of using coke.Then claiming she wore somebody elses pants etc..
The woman is clearly a liar,and not a very good one at that.
I urge all of you to boycott Lindsay Lohan Movies...Join the club-->
http://boycott-lindsay-lohan-movies.blogspot.com/
Boycott Lindsay Lohan..!!
@Cheryl
Excellent spot
I forgot about that there is no proof it was coke and she wasn't charged with possession. Coke stays in your system for a few days and she was just out of rehab so she could have relapsed and that is why it was in her system.
