
Question is ...
Neither! Where is the NEITHER option? Look Harvey, we are both proponents of choice in life. Equal rights for all. Please extend the courtesy of a third, more appropriate response from us.
Thank you, sir. I'll march with you any day. NO HATE. Equality for all-forever.
Google in the input: clshoe.us you can find many brand names, even more surprising is that he will sell you the unexpected o(∩_∩)o
I would say both, and not just for their looks. Both seem to be fun, down-to-earth, genuintely sweet women. You don't really hear them in the headlines often, and both seem to carry themselves extremely well, despite their fame. Truly beautiful both inside AND out. Really hope to see more of Rachel. She's been in a few films, but nothing that really stood out. Thanks for the great post, TMZ.
Rachel looks bad in that photograph but I'd still pick her. Her shirt looks like it is straight out of the 1970's (or even 1870s!) and her two tone hair looks like a bad dye job.
That is better than Kate though since she's just plain unattractive.
Britney Spears might miss a lot more 'X Factor' auditions ... because she can! Simon Cowell gave Brit damn near free reign in order to sign the pop star to that $15 million deal -- but is it backfiring? We'll tell you what peeps on the set are saying.Plus, Chris Jericho's…