TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Brooke Mueller -- Flaunting Child Custody

3/4/2011 12:25 PM PST BY TMZ STAFF

Just hours after Brooke Mueller backed out of a custody agreement with Charlie Sheen, the actor's  estranged wife took their twin boys out to dinner last night at a place where everyone could see them.

media-removed-tmz
Brooke -- along with her twins Bob and Max -- hit up Johnny Rockets at The Grove in L.A. -- a place popular with stars and the paparazzi -- where they dined on french fries and other '50s-inspired cuisine.


As TMZ first reported, Mueller called off the custody deal yesterday because Charlie blabbed about the terms to the media.

160 COMMENTS

No Avatar
106.

Made it Past 27    

"Flaunting Child Custody"? Whatever...

Good for them. It was good for the kids to go out to eat with their mom.

1225 days ago
107.

MIDNIGHT TOKER    

these stars use their kids as chess pieces,thats why you have so many messed up kids out there

1225 days ago
108.

edwina    

The Disposable Woman

By ANNA HOLMES

FORTY-THREE minutes into his “special live edition” with Charlie Sheen on Monday night, Piers Morgan finally got around to asking his guest a real question. Before that, Mr. Morgan and Mr. Sheen had mostly traded chuckles and anecdotes about multiday benders, inflated network salaries and meet-ups in Aspen, Colo. But then, after three commercial breaks, Mr. Morgan inquired, “Have you ever hit a woman?”

Two minutes later, with Mr. Morgan apparently satisfied with the actor’s answer that no, women should be “hugged and caressed,” that line of questioning was over.

That Mr. Morgan didn’t press the issue of domestic violence shouldn’t have come as any surprise. CBS executives, not to mention the millions of viewers of his “family” sitcom “Two and a Half Men,” have consistently turned a blind eye toward Mr. Sheen’s history of abusing women. Part of this, of course, is about money. The actor’s F-18 of an id — to borrow a metaphor from Mr. Sheen himself — had long provided the show a steady stream of free publicity. It also helped make Mr. Sheen the highest-paid actor on television, at $1.2 million an episode.

But it’s also about apathy. Even now — after Mr. Sheen began carpet-bombing his bosses in radio rants, prompting CBS to shut down production on the show — observers still seem more entertained than outraged, tuning in to see him appear on every talk show on the planet and coming up with creative Internet memes based on his most colorful statements. And while his self-abuses are endlessly discussed, his abuse of women is barely broached.

Our inertia is not for lack of evidence. In 1990, he accidentally shot his fiancée at the time, the actress Kelly Preston, in the arm. (The engagement ended soon after.) In 1994 he was sued by a college student who alleged that he struck her in the head after she declined to have sex with him. (The case was settled out of court.) Two years later, a sex film actress, Brittany Ashland, said she had been thrown to the floor of Mr. Sheen’s Los Angeles house during a fight. (He pleaded no contest and paid a fine.)

In 2006, his wife at the time, the actress Denise Richards, filed a restraining order against him, saying Mr. Sheen had shoved and threatened to kill her. In December 2009, Mr. Sheen’s third wife, Brooke Mueller, a real-estate executive, called 911 after Mr. Sheen held a knife to her throat. (He pleaded guilty and was placed on probation.) Last October, another actress in sex films, Capri Anderson, locked herself in a Plaza Hotel bathroom after Mr. Sheen went on a rampage. (Ms. Anderson filed a criminal complaint but no arrest was made.) And on Tuesday, Ms. Mueller requested a temporary restraining order against her former husband, alleging that he had threatened to cut her head off, “put it in a box and send it to your mom.” (The order was granted, and the couple’s twin sons were quickly removed from his home.) “Lies,” Mr. Sheen told People magazine.

The privilege afforded wealthy white men like Charlie Sheen may not be a particularly new point, but it’s an important one nonetheless. Lindsay Lohan and Britney Spears are endlessly derided for their extracurricular meltdowns and lack of professionalism on set; the R&B star Chris Brown was made a veritable pariah after beating up his equally, if not more, famous girlfriend, the singer Rihanna. Their careers have all suffered, and understandably so.

This hasn’t been the case with Mr. Sheen, whose behavior has been repeatedly and affectionately dismissed as the antics of a “bad boy” (see: any news article in the past 20 years), a “rock star” (see: Piers Morgan, again) and a “rebel” (see: Andrea Canning’s “20/20” interview on Tuesday). He has in essence, achieved a sort of folk-hero status; on Wednesday, his just-created Twitter account hit a million followers, setting a Guinness World Record.

But there’s something else at work here: the seeming imperfection of Mr. Sheen’s numerous accusers. The women are of a type, which is to say, highly unsympathetic. Some are sex workers — pornographic film stars and escorts — whose compliance with churlish conduct is assumed to be part of the deal. (For the record: It is not.)

Others, namely Ms. Richards and Ms. Mueller, are less-famous starlets or former “nobodies” whose relationships with Mr. Sheen have been disparaged as purely sexual and transactional. The women reside on a continuum in which injuries are assumed and insults are expected.

“Gold diggers,” “prostitutes” and “sluts” are just some of the epithets lobbed at the women Mr. Sheen has chosen to spend his time with. Andy Cohen, a senior executive at Bravo and a TV star in his own right, referred to the actor’s current companions, Natalie Kenly and Bree Olson, as “whores” on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” program on Tuesday. Arianna Huffington sarcastically tweeted that Mr. Sheen’s girlfriends “symbolize modesty, loyalty and good taste.” Mr. Sheen’s own nickname for Ms. Kenly and Ms. Olson — “the goddesses” — is in its own way indicative of their perceived interchangeability and disposability.

It’s these sorts of explicit and implicit value judgments that underscore our contempt for women who are assumed to be trading on their sexuality. A woman’s active embrace of the fame monster or participation in the sex industry, we seem to say, means that she compromises her right not to be assaulted, let alone humiliated, insulted or degraded; it’s part of the deal. The promise of a modern Cinderella ending — attention, fame, the love and savings account of a rich man — is always the assumed goal.

Objectification and abuse, it follows, is not only an accepted occupational hazard for certain women, but something that men like Mr. Sheen have earned the right to indulge in. (Mr. Sheen reportedly once said that he didn’t pay prostitutes for the sex; he paid them “to leave.”) One can’t help but think that his handlers might have moved more quickly to rein in their prized sitcom stallion if his victims’ motivations weren’t assumed to be purely mercenary. (Or if they enjoyed parity and respect with regards to their age, influence and earning power.)

These assumptions — about women, about powerful men, about bad behavior — have roots that go way back but find endorsement in today’s unscripted TV culture. Indeed, it’s difficult for many to discern any difference between Mr. Sheen’s real-life, round-the-clock, recorded outbursts and the sexist narratives devised by reality television producers, in which women are routinely portrayed as backstabbing floozies, and dreadful behavior by males is explained away as a side effect of unbridled passion or too much pilsner.

As Jennifer Pozner points out in her recent book “Reality Bites Back: The Troubling Truth About Guilty-Pleasure TV,” misogyny is embedded within the DNA of the reality genre. One of the very first millennial shows, in fact, “Who Wants to Marry a Multimillionaire,” was notable in that it auctioned off what producers called the “biggest prize of all”: a supposedly wealthy B-movie writer named Rick Rockwell — who was later revealed to have had a restraining order filed against him by a woman he’d threatened to kill. According to Ms. Pozner, the reaction of one of the producers of “Multimillionaire” was, “Great! More publicity!”

On reality television, gratuitous violence and explicit sexuality are not only entertainment but a means to an end. These enthusiastically do***ented humiliations are positioned as necessities in the service of some final prize or larger benefit — a marriage proposal, a modeling contract, $1 million. But they also make assault and abasement seem commonplace, acceptable behavior, tolerated by women and encouraged in men.

Which brings us back to Mr. Morgan, who, like many of Mr. Sheen’s past and present press enablers, showed little to no urgency in addressing the question of violence against women. “You’re entitled to behave however the hell you like as long as you don’t scare the horses and the children,” Mr. Morgan said at one point. Scaring women, it seems, was just fine.

During the interview, a series of images played on a continuous loop. One of them was a defiant and confident-looking Charlie Sheen, in a mug shot taken after his 2009 domestic violence arrest.


Anna Holmes is a writer and the creator of the Web site Jezebel.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/04/opinion/04holmes.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

1225 days ago
109.

Me    

RadarOnline posted a video of Charlie after he lost his boys and he predicted this. He said Brooke will just use the boys for photo opts. Guess he knows her well.

1225 days ago
110.

deb    

No fan of Brooke's but since when it is against the law to take your kids out? Better than them being with the nutbar that is Charlie Sheen!

1225 days ago
111.

Bubbles    

Brooke looks like she has been rode hard and put away wet. I wonder if she got invitro for the boys, or popped clomid? She should have named them Ching and Ching.

Team Sheen

1225 days ago
112.

msherks    

seriously ???

flaunting it ??

going out to dinner is flaunting it ??


how about putting your two small children on tv with porno chicks ????

how is that not flaunting it ????

biased much tmz ???

good for her for standing up to this violent dirtbag !

he doesn't give a crap about his kids that's stone cold obvious !

1225 days ago
113.

tlynn    

They are both crackheads!! They both are frequent stays at the nearest rehab facility - neither parent is fit for these kids. They both have shown their crackhead tactics - Her by allowing her kids around his crackhead whores and him by telling & showing the world he's a straight drunken crackhead! But because he has money & she's got a little of it every month, they have to keep the game going - if that includes the twins, so be it. Why would you take your kids to a pap spot after them being taken from their father? For a f'n photo op, to make the game interesting at the expense of your kids!! Somebody needs to get these kids out of there before these one of these two crackwhores puts them in further danger!!

1225 days ago
114.

meghan dean    

is she trying to brag like sayin haha charlie and everybody i got my kids or somethin i mean like seriously wat is with her.

1225 days ago
115.

Angel    

TEAM CHARLIE


BROOKE IS A HYPOCRITE.
AT LEAST CHARLIE ADMITS SOME THINGS, AND HE HAS TIGER BLOOD!!


I DON'T LIKE BROOKE. CHARLIE GETS MY VOTE, NOT FOR FATHER OF THE YEAR, BUT FOR WINNING!!!

1225 days ago
116.

steven katona    

bravo brooke! bravo for putting up with tmz's reporter! if it was me he'd be runnin for his life! eh tmz???????? you get a man to do a little less interviewing and more snapping pictures when she's gotta kid out there otherwise i'm blogging on radar.com deal. tmz better learn some manners! if tmz keeps this style of interventionist/rude/cameraman question askin/too personal on the street then i'll be postin something on craigslist. freespeech style. i'm 110 grand in debt tmz for student loans. sue me. this canadian calls it like it is. tmz needs a new crew to follow these superstars. hire me or put a hit out on me. talk about being insensitive. tmz's reputation and ability to bring the inside scoop is now being questioned. i hope the sheens don't reject tmz...i don't wanna sign up to other blog sites! so tmz please be respectful of this clan.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOW A PERSONAL MESSAGE TO BROOKE
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

omg brooke! you are way hotter on this tmz video that in those crappy pics all over the net!!!!! charlies got his wannabe's but brooke you are the icing on the cake! you are the shining gem in this universe and look soooo delicious. omg brooke this is a personal fan request! its time for a swim suit shot to make sure charlie realizes he's made the biggest mistake of his lifetime! omg brooke you are such a 10/10. high class. its time to call denise. you two should do lunch. its the new ex wives club. show some solidarity and give charlie a clear message: the ex's are in charge!

srry tmz...xox

srry charlie....xox

1225 days ago
117.

Lori    

Why do you just assume she was trying to get attention? It sounds like a fun place to go, so she took her boys there. Even if she did want the media to see that she is a good mom, so what? The kids obviously had fun, so what is the harm? The paparazzi is going to follow her almost anywhere, so she may as well have fun and live her life as normally as she can.

1225 days ago
118.

Yolanda    

Even Coke Heads have scheduled photo-ops with the kiddies.
BUT if your going through a public mess taking the kids to papp central is tacky. Being out when you already stated that you went back to CS FOR A HOUSE makes you a whore. And i laughed at your 'contempt' motion because he publicly called you a coke head with video evidence. AND you admit that you are still actively doing coke.

bOTH OF ya'll need a rubber room and a white jacket.

1225 days ago
119.

Sammie    

Shame on you TMZ. You reported yourself she refused to honor the agreement when Sheen immediately violated it by discussing it with the media not 'backed out.' I'm not saying she's a prize but she's a heck of a lot better than creepy Charlie. Isn't there a plant named that? Oh, it's Creeping Charlie. Same thing.

1225 days ago
120.

susan    

What is wrong with you people? Should she stay at home just because Charlie is on a manic binge? She is not showing off her kids. Maybe she just wants to provide them with some normalcy. Shame on TMZ for this stupide headline.

1225 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web