Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Lindsay Lohan's Friend -- I'm No Accomplice!

4/22/2011 4:55 PM PDT BY TMZ STAFF

Lindsay Lohan's friend is adamant he wasn't playing decoy when Lindsay allegedly stole a $2,500 necklace back in January -- sources tell TMZ, he just wanted to chat fashion with the store owner.


As we previously reported, Sofia Kaman -- the owner of the L.A. jewelry store Lindsay allegedly stole from -- testified that Lindsay's friend Patrick distracted her several times while Lindsay was in the store, hitting her with obscure questions about jewelry ... while Lindsay made off with the goods.

But sources tell us, Patrick's a fashion enthusiast who even owns his own clothing line -- and was simply expressing genuine interest in Sofia's company.

The hearing will continue at 1:30 PM PST. Stay tuned.


No Avatar


You are really trying to save your money maker, don't you?

Quit thinking you are the Law. You are not CIA, FBI, NSA, NASA. You are a freaking celebrity gossip website!

1191 days ago


Sources tell you ? At this point, you are nothing more than Lindsay's PR machine TMZ, and it is really starting to show. She is an entitled mess making a mockery of our legal system and once the bitch is finally in the pokey, I look forward to never visiting this site again...

1191 days ago

Pony Princess    

Lindsay Lohan has THREE(3) MISDEMEANORS


Two words:


1191 days ago


no1curr tbqfh...

1191 days ago


On tape the skinny dude (crack head?) was clearly occupying the clerk while LL slipped her own necklaces over the stolen piece before they zoomed out of the shop; if his testimony doesn't add up at trial he'll be charged as an accessory - hopefully for his sake he knows perjury is a felony. lol.

By the way if he has a clothing line how much are his annual sales (as if he has any, lmao)

1191 days ago

Lynn T    

Of course he's going too deny this. He's also in the line of fire.

As for the value of the jewelry, everything I have read in case law points to retail value being the determining value. Otherwise, it's to arbitrary, as wholesale mark-up/ gifting is not indicative of value. Reassuring People vs Swanson (1983). This courts have ruled on this several times. It creates a problem if Lindsay is treated differently.

1191 days ago


WoW...Anyone notice that whenever something that's Lindsay's fault goes down -- some other poor, innocent bastard has to get blamed for it??

1191 days ago


Please would one judge quit being weak.. Put this girl in jail!! To bad I can't be on the jury

1191 days ago


Don't you see what TMZ is trying to do? They are trying to control the Law! They keep providing pointless defense and pressuring the ones involved! And they will do suck thing until their money maker walks out of the charge!

I am really starting to think Harvey would cover up a murder committed by any member of Lohan family, just so he could keep milking money out of the news about them!

TMZ. I like one guy, the rest of you are bunch of retards!

1191 days ago


WOW!That place looks like a back door alley type store. I would say not guilty because I doubt a necklace worth $2500 could come a place like that.

1191 days ago


i'm just ready for white oprah to bust into the court room riding on her chariot made of delusion screaming, "THIS IS SO UNFAIR TO DO THIS TO MY CHILD!!!!!"

1191 days ago



I agree! It's like Lilo possesses these special powers on gaining leniency from judges...Or shall I say Shawn Holley does...

Lilo will skate on this charge I bet...

1191 days ago


"sources tell us, Patrick's a fashion enthusiast who even owns his own clothing line"

PLEASE, what a joke, everyone in California seems to have their own clothing line. It is the latest term used by people who don't have a job.

1191 days ago


LOL sparky!!!

1191 days ago


Come on people do they think that we really believe that Lindsay, just forgot to take it off. Give me a break!!!

1191 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web