TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Arnie Klein -- My Buddy Was Not Michael's Lover

4/22/2011 10:30 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF

Dr. Arnold Klein -- the dermatologist who loomed large in Michael Jackson's life -- has now changed his story and says his good friend and office manager -- Jason Pfeiffer -- did NOT have an affair with Michael Jackson.

0422_arnie_mj_jason_BN_01

Klein had told TMZ ... Jackson was gay but that Jason's alleged relationship with the singer was the only gay relationship MJ ever had.  Klein told us Jason was "the love of [Michael's] life."

But now on his Facebook page, Klein says "Allegations about ... Jason being Michael Jackson's lover are ridiculous.  That story was made up ... "

Klein also scoffs at allegations he contributed to MJ's death, saying, "I made two interventions on Michael's Propofol Abuse myself ..."

336 COMMENTS

No Avatar
301.

nan    

well i just was looking over this stuff and after all is said and done..i am sorry for your loss..
that being that michael jackson was not the monster some people with their own mission or agenda wanted to be...
this stuff is regurgitated over and over again and still after mj went through the process and the chandlers hid.....he is still suspect...


..

1173 days ago
302.

Guest    

Ulja 9 hours ago

============
I don't consider that he spend a lot of time with children in general. In the first place he worked much as " to the seventh sweat", in the second there was full of adult guys and women around him with which he spent time. I permanently find some new interviews of people which communicated with him .. And always I am surprised, when he had so much time to communicate with so many people and be engaged in the career in show business. What a surprising person he was!
----------------------------------------------------------------

Ulja, you are speaking on behalf of a man you never knew. I seriously doubt he communicates with you, now that he's dead. If you say he does, then get help.

1173 days ago
303.

Cherwood    

The KLEIN Conspiracy III - Pt. 2......
-Ric and Guest, Here's the thing, if you review the doc again it simply states that they found the DNA of four males on SHEETS, but it doesn't say if they were on the bed at the same time. It also says that one of the males was Michael, but NONE of them were the so-called VICTIMS, Gavin and Star Arviso.....
Listen, we all took our Sex Ed. in jr.high so we know that there doesn't have to be Intercourse taking place for there to be soiled sheets....things happen at night without any prompting from another partner, or even from the guy himself for that matter....you get the drill. Semen on a sheet doesn't mean that Intercourse took place....
IMO, if this was what you and Black thought it was, I agree that it would be damning evidence. But clearly it wasn't because this doc is a list of the Motions the defense made to keep certain allegations against Michael and his lawyers out of the trial. I'm sure the court must have checked the VALIDITY of these claims before shutting them down. If it had been found that Michael and another male's DNA was found on the SAME SHEET, I'm sure they would've allowed it as evidence but they didn't. If you read the rest of the doc, you also see that they found a pair of his underwear with the sheets, and they were soiled with blood and had COCAINE in them. Funny that they tested and found no Cocaine in that blood. The Doc went on to state that the Meds Michael takes for Vitiligo causes him to "dispense blood." Clearly the court shared my thoughts that this was evidence of CONTAMINATION....HOW DID THE COCAINE GET IN HIS UNDERWEAR, if it wasn't in his blood? This is one of the many reasons why this case failed--first of all, it wasn't the truth, but also there's the fact that Sneddon was determined to nail Michael one way or the other. Who's to say he didn't manufacture the sheets with DNA from the other males? This was clearly Sneddon at his WORST, attempting to piece together a case that was DOOMED before it even started....
Thanks for providing this link because it helped me to see that I had overlooked a few things on this case. Now I realize that the only thing that saved Michael from Prison was his innocence and having the BEST CRIMINAL ATTORNEY IN THE COUNTRY--MESSEREAU!!
-Hey Sofi! I know what you mean. I've also seen and read Interviews with Klein that were all positive, but at about that point when he gave TMZ the Interview about "peeing in cups", something changed....not sure what, but I thought it may have been his way of trying to let the Estate or family know that he may have damaging things to say about Michael in order to get money from them. He seemed determined back then to connect himself to Michael in some way and half the time he looked like he was on drugs or something.....
The whole thing with Klein is hard to figure because if he was as big of a jerk as he appears to be, I'm not sure why Michael stayed friends with him. Then again, I don't think he had been involved with Michael all that much in the later years until Spring of 2009 when he started working to restore his face.....
As for TMZ, I don't trust them anymore than I do Klein, so there's a chance that they misquoted him but I still think he and that Jason LIED to TMZ and the other news outlets and that's why the 2nd part of that Exclusive Jason was supposed to get on that TV Tabloid got pulled....even THEY thought he and Klein were full of it. It never ceases to AMAZE me that even in this day and age where you see Gays all over TV, people still use it for SHOCK VALUE....a man is different and doesn't sleep with every woman he meets so automatically, he's gay....Oye.
-Hey Moni! Thanks for pointing that out. I also think that if it were actually Semen, they would've said semen which would be a clearer connection to their case that he shared his bed.....
-CJ, c'mon now...we're not going to take the word of a blog, that's just someone's OPINION--the same as anyone on these boards. Give me a break!
-Hey Mymjj5, great job shutting down the DEMONS....GON' GIRL!
-Hey Chico, EXCELLENT POST!! And you brought up a point that Sofi and I were discussing on another thread--I questioned if anyone knew if Michael was ever asked if the Mags found in that Briefcase was his. How do we KNOW if that question never came up? It's ASSumed that the books and Mags were his because they were found in his home, but if he and his people knew about the raid, they should've gotten rid of the briefcase...
This also gives me more fuel to believe that Wiesner and Konitzer were in cahoots with Sneddon. I know they were named "Unindicted Co-conspirators", but WHY weren't they indicted? Did they work a trade with Sneddon to escape Prosecution? It was even mentioned in that doc that Weisner used to own a Brothel and he definitely STOLE from Michael...who knows what else he was capable of? I wish they would've taken samples of Weisnr and Konitzer's DNA....bet they would've matched the ones on those sheets....
-Guest, please stop LYING to prove your point, it'll never work. The docs you provided stated simply that 1 DNA that wasn't Michael's was found on some sheets in a bag with the underwear, the other 3 DNA's were found on the Mattress--it said NOTHING about a Mattress pad....
The doc also stated that there was COCAINE and BLOOD found in the underwear, which belonged tro Michael. However, when tested, there was No Cocaine found in that blood...it NEVER mentioned DEMEROL...
If you got those LIES from that blog, that is nothing but HEARSAY that wasn't even credible enough to make the TABLOIDS....try, try again....
As for the other blogs on the SBC website, they're all from Sneddon's TWISTED MIND. They are his motions and rebuttal of the defense's motions so of course, they point out crap like the rantings of a pre-adolescent child....c'mon now, Michael was mentoring those boys--as you can see, most of them went into music or dance. Maybe the Cascio girl wasn't included because of that. I doubt if you asked her now if she thought anything weird was going on, she'd say yes. Every girl goes through that phase where any HINT of rejection becomes the BAIN of their existence, even if there's NO TRUTH to it whatsoever. Michael looked on the Cascios as his 2nd family so I'm sure he loved her too, but knew not to include her because she was a girl. I know there were girls who stayed over--even high profile ones like Paris Hilton, Nicole Ritchie and the Kardashians. It's just funny how noone but the Arvisos, Francias and Chandlers were abused by him--all people who were PROVEN to have been con-artists on other occasions....
BTW: You want to talk about worship a flawed human being? Well IMO you are worshipping at the altar of HATE by taking GOSSIP and adding more lies to it. And for the record let me tell you what I've told the rest of the Demons on these boards:
THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD--JESUS, and we must worship HIM AND HIM ALONE!! IMO, you and your ilk are the ones who may have worshipped Michael but when he began to get bad Press, you felt betrayed by him and turned to HATE! You, Ric, AQ, Tellit and many others on these boards act just like a little child who just found out there's no Santa Claus, Easter Bunny, or Tooth Fairy....GET OVER IT and GET A LIFE!!
Michael was a Man--a VERY GIFTED one, but a man and he acknowledged that his gifts came from God on many occasions. So do us a favor and find a new axe to grind. Just because we Supporters are smart enought to recognize GENIUS when we see it doesn't make us idol worshippers, it make us HIGHLY INTELLIGENT....
-Hey Mymjj5! You know how these DEMONS are, they'll say ANYTHING to prove their point. The Court Doc said NOTHING about the sheets being from a "recent trip he had taken"....WHAT?! This idiot got hold of some Blog written by an even BIGGER IDIOT than him and now he's regurgitating this CRAP! Wonder what else he's going to add to the story....somebody's nose is a FOOT LONG by now....
-Ulja, great post! And I think we need to excuse this "Guest" character. Why does he think he knows Michael anymore than you? Everything you said was valid and doesn't requiring knowing him personally....
You can always tell when you hit a nerve with these IDIOTS because they always make a LAME attempt to say you're DELUDED or an IDOL WORSHIPPER....I guess you're only ENLIGHTENED if you HATE Michael for NO REASON like they do. That's why I call them DEMONS, because they spend all of their time spinning LIES and HATE for a man who did nothing but LOVE and GIVE himself to the world through his Music and Performances....
-Hey Nan! I was looking for you on the other board to ask if you remember hearing or reading that anyone ever asked Michael if the Mags or briefcase belonged to him. As Chico stated, if they knew about the raid, then why didn't someone in his camp remove said briefcase and books? Also, I highly suspect Wiesner, Konitzer or Schaffel may have played a part in this including that crap about the sheet/mattress/underwear/cocaine. Wouldn't put it past any of them....

Cher
MJJ Justice League 2009--WE ARE HERE TO CHANGE THE WORLD!!!
No Peace till Justice!
MICHAEL--IL.O.V.E.U4EVER and MISS-U-SO-MUCH!!

1173 days ago
304.

sofi    

It never ceases to AMAZE me that even in this day and age where you see Gays all over TV, people still use it for SHOCK VALUE....a man is different and doesn't sleep with every woman he meets so automatically, he's gay....Oye.

Cherwood you got that right.
Thank you again,i learn alot from your posts.

1173 days ago
305.

Ulja    


Guest 7 hours ago If you say he does, then get help.

If you say that he doesn't , then get a rebuke.

1173 days ago
306.

Ulja    

Cher...Wonder what else he's going to add to the story....somebody's nose is a FOOT LONG by now....like Meg Whitman's nose during the election campaign for California's governor)

1173 days ago
307.

mymjj5    

Hi Cherwood!!!
Loved, loved, loved your post! Clearly some of that so called evidence was planted. Why on earth would the names of the so called other men be kept secret? The world wants the general public to accept consensual same sex relationships between two adults. yet in the case of michael he's ridiculed and others allegedly involved are protected from rejection and possible backlash. IMO: That trash was fabricated simply to humiliate Michael. I don't think they even cared about proving anything, as long as it hurt, humilated and damaged Michael Jackson's character to no end. Good to know the fan base is comprised of some very smart people. as for the demons, they are too easy. after about 4 or 5 scriptures they drop out powerless!!!

1172 days ago
308.

gayforliztaylor    

mj insisted that he and the arvizo kids did nothing wrong, and he said he did only charitable work for gavin because he gave money to thousands of other kids. what happened to his 'bible' saving his childhood?

1172 days ago
309.

Cherwood    

-Hey Mymjj5! Thanks for the support. And you make a great point about the fact that they kept the names of the other males secret--what were they trying to hide? They exposed everything about Michael--if he blew his nose, they were waiting to expose it so why not tell who the others were if it was some big sexual deal. IMO, Sneddon knew exactly what he was doing...he would go to ANY extremes to take Michael down and the sad part is that he knew he could use any number of ALLEGATIONS in his bag of tricks and this Country would buy it....
These docs have convinced me even more that the 2005 Trial was part of a grand scheme to get rid of Michael. There are reports that SEVERAL cases of Molestation happened in a Catholic Church in the Santa Barbara area, but Sneddon chose to ignore that so he could persecute an INNOCENT man...and I'm CONVINCED he had INSIDE HELP to do his dirty work. It's a fact that Michael had LeGrand check into Branca's dealings but what he found was that Dieter Weisner and Ron Konitzer were funneling Michael's money into accts. for themselves. All sorts of CRAP happened to Michael under their watch--the '93 AND 2005 allegations happened during their time with Michael...thank God he got rid of them when he did or he may have been gone sooner....he also began saying he thought someone was out to KILL him during their watch. I really do think they made a deal of some kind with Sneddon to get rid of him. I know people will think this is incredulous, but dig this: at one point, Weisner had Michael's POWER OF ATTORNEY....not sure how he got it or why Michael let him get it, but he had it which means he had the "Keys to the Kingdom" for a period of time. Maybe he got it by getting Michael to sign it under false pretenses....he was Michael's Business Mgr, at the time which put him in the position to do any number of shady things at Michael's expense.....
-Dummy/Duilama, FYI I post when I'm able to, could care LESS about getting the last word, I only care about the TRUTH and posting something that ADDS to the dialogue...you may want to try it sometime. Sorry if my posts don't coincide with when you Demons are on board, but them's the breaks, son...guess I must be LIVING right....LOL x 1000!
ANd somehow you've gotten the OJ case mixed up with Michael's 2005 Trial....DUH, the 2 had NOTHING in common! LA DA lost that case simply because they contaminated the evidence and crime scene among other mistakes. Whether or not OJ was guilty, I have NO clue because I haven't done intense research on that case....I only know enough to know that the DA couldn't prove their case beyond ANY doubt so they lost. So spare us the diatribe about OJ, I know it's a T-Party and Trailer Park FAVE, but you gotta get off that one--it's WEAK, even for you....
Besides, Michael's case was different--for one it wasn't MURDER, and secondly, there is a WEALTH of information in the Trial Transcripts and even in those SBC docs that PROVE Sneddon was working to FRAME Michael. He even got the FBI in on the attack and strung them along for 10 YEARS until they finally told him to BUG OFF and advised him that they had found NOTHING on Michael, and that he had possibly infringed on Michael's CIVIL RIGHTS...
Still think Sneddon and his cronies couldn't have planted evidence?
Of course you don't, because despite all of the LEGIT research out there, you refuse to believe anything but LIES about Michael so what difference does it make? You want us to take you serious when all you do here is TRASH Michael and his Fan/Supporters? Good luck with that....
And let's get one thing straight for future reference; I have NO problem with you demons calling me RABID, as long as it means I'm NOT LIKE YOU!!!
R-eal
A-wesome
B-lessed
I-ntelligent
D-iva!
CHECK and MATE!!!

Cher
MJJ Justice League 2009--WE ARE HERE TO CHANGE THE WORLD!!!
No Peace till Justice!
MICHAEL--IL.O.V.E.U4EVER and MISS-U-SO-MUCH!!

1172 days ago
310.

Ulja    

Cherwood 4 hours ago
Very convincingly and sincerely.

1172 days ago
311.

Don Alex    

Which one is which, the neckless pile of lard to the right, or the one to the left who is leering at MJ's photo like an extra in William Friedkin's "Cruising". Neither of them looks exactly "straight". Maybe MJ had a crush on Curly from the "Three Stooges".

1172 days ago
312.

gayforliztaylor    

lmao sneddon had no tricks because he was an embarrassment. sadly, your stupid king mj refused to get rid of the rabid parents and boys who damaged his children's comfortable home. hey, he liked being a suffering victim of daddy joe jackson. mj also enabled his boy friends' confused, abused lifestyles. these boy friends' mental breakdown was worse with jackson's cowardly lies and obsession with friendship with people he barely met.

1172 days ago
313.

nan    

-Hey Nan! I was looking for you on the other board to ask if you remember hearing or reading that anyone ever asked Michael if the Mags or briefcase belonged to him. As Chico stated, if they knew about the raid, then why didn't someone in his camp remove said briefcase and books? Also, I highly suspect Wiesner, Konitzer or Schaffel may have played a part in this including that crap about the sheet/mattress/underwear/cocaine. Wouldn't put it past any of them....

Cher

hi cher , sorry i just saw this ..i wouldnt put anything past anybody when it comes to greed...
i know they had advance notice in 93 but i wasnt so sure in 2003.remember the film of them going to his house and the guards were stunned..i think that one was a surprise because i remember one of the germans had to tell mj while he was in vegas doing the video that his house was being raided as that moment, but i could be wrong of course..
as far a the two germans, they did get power of atty.and the woman who was just hired for a week who was one of the lawyers girlsfriends with basically no p.r. experience was the one to call jermaine and tell him . jermaine got it back..amazing how no one else but this woman with very little experience and never even personally met mj, is the ONLY one to notice he was being ripped off..just so sad ..so many greedy people.by the way her employment lasted one week i think..hmmm
t mezz said the reason they did the convoluted conspiracy charge was to keep people who could testify on behalf of mj away from court.scare them into lawyering up etc.lots of intimidation tactics.
the other thing was that would be the way to force getting his financial records and really let his enemies see what state of affairs he was in.i am thinking of that catalog everybody was fighting over ...so that helped those people which makes me think tom sneddon had a much larger agenda ..plus they just wanted to embarrass him,
this stuff with the catalog, the bashir do***entary , sneddon , feldman seems to certainly help all of them in their own way ..enter janet arviso and jay jackson, and the kids and it was a perfect storm..have a good night.

1171 days ago
314.

nan    

sorry cher ..i should say the reason for the supposed confinement of the arviso family was because if they talked it would ruin mj career and he supposedly was in such dire financial straights he concocted this thing with others to confine them to neverland..absolutely ridiculious.but that is why they wanted to show his desperate financial situation..
the child was saying he never touched him ,doesnt want to leave neverland cause he is having such a great time , as he said on the stand, told all kinds of people including, teachers , social services, ed bradley from 60 minutes the same thing...so naturally mj and company commit a crime to help cover a non crime ....oh yeah, then he gropes him......astounding what tom sneddon would do to destroy his life..night

1171 days ago
315.

mymjj5.    

Cherwood 20 hours ago -Hey Mymjj5! Thanks for the support. And you make a great point about the fact that they kept the names of the other males secret--what were they trying to hide? They exposed everything about Michael--if he blew his nose, they were waiting to expose it so why not tell who the others were if it was some big sexual deal. IMO, Sneddon knew exactly what he was doing...he would go to ANY extremes to take Michael down and the sad part is that he knew he could use any number of ALLEGATIONS in his bag of tricks and this Country would buy it....
________________________________________________________________
Hi Cherwood!
You're welcome. It's so ridiculous how the culprits, liars and thieves all want to plant imagry of homosexuality in the minds of the public about Michael. They conjure up every nasty little detail. These grown men in Michael's bed should have come forward. Why should michael be under the radar alone? Why would seventy two cop raid Michael's home only to protect the so called men in his bed? The DNA was planted I'm certain of it. All the culprits wanted was to hurt and humiliate michael. They did it while he was alive and they're still at it. Well, I still love him. He was a great human being with a beautiful spirit. Can't wait for the trial to begin and end. But never my LOVE for the one and only Michael J.

1171 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web