TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Camille Grammer: Kelsey Only Wants My Son

6/2/2011 3:05 PM PDT BY TMZ STAFF

Camille Grammer filed for custody of the two kids she had with Kelsey Grammer because she claims Kelsey only wants his son to come live with him, not his daughter ... sources connected to Camille tell TMZ, but Kelsey's lawyer says it's 100% not true.

0210_kelsey_camille_getty_TMZ_01

Our sources say Camille claims Kelsey only wants his 6-year-old son, Jude, to come live with him in New York City and not 9-year-old Mason.

Kelsey's lawyer, Lance Spiegel, tells TMZ, "Their statement is inaccurate, as indicated by our papers filed with the court today.  Kelsey's priority is to protect both of his children and he will not make further comment, except that their statement is inaccurate."


43 COMMENTS

No Avatar
1.

Tammy    

I wonder about the statement in her filing that he wanted to separate the kids. Douche!!

1053 days ago
2.

Nikkcolle    

Even if it was true why on earth would she get that info to the media so her daughter can hear that one day. Stupid, selfish Hollywood douche bags.

1053 days ago
3.

Wester    

WHO CARES ABOUT THESE DIRTY TWO FOOLS?
HOPE THEY GET STDS

1053 days ago
4.

Jane    

There = location, their = belonging to a person. Was this Spiegel's mistake or TMZ's?

1053 days ago
5.

Rogue Warrior    

Yeah cause he is done with YOU!!!!!!!! He's the better parent anyway!!!!

1053 days ago
6.

norma    

oh my goodness she is the shallowest women ever she has no substance and she's concieted she had the nerve to insult someone about there lips she has had her whole face done she looks like a waliking billboard for ugly women who have had plastic surgery she is a terrible role model for anyone she has 4 nannies she's F NNN lazy and sickening,no wonder she was the most ahed women on reality tv she is a pool of crap

1053 days ago
7.

Amazed    

What a terrible, insensitive thing to put out there for her daughter to read. Shame on you, Camille.

1053 days ago
8.

kar    

At this point I would believe anything from these crazy people. Neither one deserves to have kids. They both need to grow up!

1053 days ago
9.

kar    

At this point I would believe anything from these crazy people. Neither one deserves to have kids. They both need to grow up!

1053 days ago
10.

Seattlelite    

The word 'there' in this post is spelled wrong! It should be
THEIR

1053 days ago
11.

Gill Grylls    

simply put, she wants MORE money. If she gets the kids, then that means MORE MONEY in her pockets. She is about as bad as Frank McCourt's wife/ex. these women are greedy and they know what they are doing when they marry into the rich. in the end it comes to money and thats what she wants.

1053 days ago
12.

Don    

Get a clue, Rogue. While Camille is something of an opportunist and no saint in her own right, Kelsey Grammer is plain and simply one of the most selfish and egotistical celebrities on earth and I highly doubt that he's the better parent in any way. This silly and too-young English woman that he recently wed is beyond naive, emotionally at least, and will discover the pitfalls of living with her beloved Kelsey soon enough.

1053 days ago
13.

Don    

Please, while Camille is something of an opportunist and no saint in her own right, Kelsey Grammer is plain and simply one of the most selfish and egotistical celebrities on earth and I highly doubt that he's the better parent in any way. This silly and too-young English woman that he recently wed is beyond naive, emotionally at least, and will find out all about the pitfalls of life with her beloved Kelsey soon enough.

1053 days ago
14.

Camille_Grammer    

@Wester 37 minutes ago

WHO CARES ABOUT THESE DIRTY TWO FOOLS?
HOPE THEY GET STDS

Hello... I gave Kelsey 4 different STDs the first time he barebacked me. You see, I used to sleep with rich arabs for $10K a night. They demand bareback, so I ended up with many STDs. heehee

1053 days ago
15.

Andrea    

Looks like the attorney should concern himself more with grammar than Grammer... THERE statement is inaccurate?

1053 days ago
| 1 | 2 | 3 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web