TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Mel Gibson Settlement

HUGE Loss for Oksana

8/31/2011 10:55 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF

0831_mel_oksana_EX
The settlement struck between Mel Gibson and Oksana Grigorieva is nothing less than a financial fiasco for a woman who wanted untold millions of dollars from her famous ex. 

TMZ obtained a copy of the original 2010 settlement worth $15 million that Oksana disavowed. At the time, Oksana said she would not go through with the settlement because she felt Mel was a danger to their daughter Lucia and believed Mel should not have unsupervised contact with the child.

In reality, sources connected to the case tell TMZ, the real reason Oksana walked away from the settlement is because she was advised she could get a lot more than $15 million because of the alleged physical abuse she claims she suffered at the hands of Mel.

Now, in a shocking twist of fate, rather than getting $15 million, Oksana is only getting $750k. On top of that, she was concerned about Mel having unsupervised visitation ... Mel is actually getting MORE unsupervised visitation based on the agreement that was just struck.

The fact is, under the 2010 agreement, Mel would NOT have gotten 50/50 custody until Lucia turns 3 years old. Under the current agreement, he gets 50/50 custody immediately.

Short story ... she should have taken door #1.

0831_mel_oksana_footer

844 COMMENTS

No Avatar
481.

WinsomeLady    

Points from Ruth Houston's Examiner article:


*Both Mel and Oksana are prohibited from publicly discussing each other or their relationship.*


Well, she (through her mother in Russia) is evidently already breaking the agreement. (The new TMZ story from Mel is not him publicly doing anything. TMZ is using the alleged tapes to get a story out there. Probably wanted everybody off of this one.)


*Oksana Grigorieva cannot pursue a civil case against Mel Gibson at any time in the future.*


But Mel Gibson was not issued the same order.


*Mel Gibson can visit the house anytime, as long as he has a designated person with him.*


Oksana was not given the same deal.

1084 days ago
482.

jacksonfive210    

haha Im glad she didnt get crap!!! I bet she blows that money in a week

1084 days ago
483.

THE BEAVER    

jacksonfive210: 3 hours ago

haha Im glad she didnt get crap!!! I bet she blows that money in a week


Yeah, and most will be spent on her looking like a bimbo that she is.

1084 days ago
484.

THE BEAVER    

Guys, look at the court video here. The police guy can not keep from laughing when her lawyer stood up and talked about her so called career will go on, and the making of her next losy cd.
TOO FUNNY!

Oh, I would just like to see her on DWTS. In practice.. the guy say.. your other left foot, Oksana. LOL

Hmm.. how about putting her with Chaz.

How about Howard Stern?

Howard is the king of all media after all. lol

1084 days ago
485.

big chief    

Ox--better remove these from your shopping list

Bladder chest lift
Buttock lift
Cheek implants
Chin augmentation
Facelift
Hair transplantation
Lip augmentation
Liposuction
Vaginal augmentation
Nose job
Botox injections
Cellulite treatment
Chemical peel
Dermabrasion
Laser treatment for skin resurfacing


1084 days ago
486.

kpacota    

All very interesting.

Especially Ludy's comments from Russia. Who was this "conman" Cook she is talking about?

Folks, if you think this is over, you have never dealt with a narcissist. While she may have lost a lot of money by letting go of the good deal and trying for more, that will only add to her sense of outrage and entitlement. Her dressed to kill (in her head) outfit for court was for Mel's benefit (I'm sure she was hoping.) But that farce may not have been what it seemed.

You're all thinking it was made public by the court. Maybe she and her lawyers did it deliberately. Maybe THEY wanted cameras. The bizarre CD promotion got my full attention. Why then? Why in front of the Court? Why not as an after-hearing interview like they have given before?

TFH theory.... Those lawyers are free speech lawyers with 1st amendment bona fides. She promised not to write a book. Nothing in there said she couldn't sing a song that was about all that experience. Even in "veiled terms." Maybe the lowers advertised the CD for a reason. So they can later say "Your Honor, we announced in front of The Court that she would be releasing a CD and The Court didn't say anything. We took silence to equal acceptance."

Do we KNOW what the lyrics in her next album are?

We haven't heard the last from her. Nor has poor Mel.

Ciao again. Nice chatting.

1084 days ago
487.

kelly    

I agree with everyone that says that we have not heard the last of her. Oxykaka will do something that mean and underhanded in the near future. It is not in her nature to let it go and go on with her life. If she is not happy, noone is.

kelly81

1084 days ago
488.

kelly    

Meant to say Oxykaka will do something that is mean and underhanded.

kelly81

1084 days ago
489.

WinsomeLady    

Transcription of the little bit of court hearing. I found the first paragraph really interesting.


The central tenet of the settlement that they have achieved and the purpose involved in today's hearing is to provide complete closure of this matter. This court will examine the parties this morning concerning their mutual desire to enter into a comprehensive settlement. Lucia will receive from petitioner's net estate after payment of specific gifts determined at petitioner's soul and absolute discretion, persons and entities other than his children no less than the amount that the petitioner's other children are receiving from his estate. The house wherein Lucia currently resides is to be placed is to be placed in trust for her and upon her 18th birthday or when petitioner's child support obligation ceases, whichever first occurs, be sold and the proceeds to be placed into the trust and dispersed accordance with the terms and conditions. Petitioner is to pay the sum of $750,000.00 to respondent in accordance with the following terms and conditions (they do not give those terms and conditions).


The proceed to the following questions from the court to petitioner and respondent:


Judge: Has petitioner heard the terms and conditions of the settlement?
Gibson: Yes I have, your Honor.


Judge: Does petitioner understand the terms and conditions of the settlement?
Gibson: Your Honor, yes I do.


Judge: Does petitioners agree to accept the terms and conditions of the settlement?
Gibson: Yes.


Judge: Does petitioner give full authority to his counsel/accounts to execute whatever do***ents are necessary to consummate the settlement?
Gibson: Yes Sir.


Judge: Has respondent heard the terms and conditions of the settlement?
Grigorieva: Yes, your Honor.


Judge: Does respondent understand the terms and conditions of the settlement?
Grigorieva: Yes I do, your Honor.


Judge: Does respondent agree to accept those terms and conditions?
Grigorieva: Yes I do.

1084 days ago
490.

Debbie    

FFS!!! Looney tunes Mother needs a bullet Another story Another lie So according to it The son the hero stopped Mel from beating Oinky
Wait a minute I THOUGHT THE KID WAS HIDING UNDER THE BED
NO.................. HE WASN'T THERE....................NO HE WAS BEHIND THE BED................


Daughter like mother a total nut job
And already the judges orders have been broken I bet you anything Oinky told her mother to go ahead and release this bull****
Debbie

1084 days ago
491.

middleagedcrazy    

@ Winsome lady --

Got lost in the legalese, but doesn't that mean that Mr. Gibson does not have to give any children anything? No special trusts or anything. Right?


At his sole discretion.

1084 days ago
492.

middleagedcrazy    

@ Winsome Lady --


Just can't imagine the Gibson family putting up with the nasty Chuckys interfering in their lives any longer.


Because Mrs. Gibson owned(s) half of everything, not her children, the Chuckys are SOL. Too bad that the individual trust was not accepted for the baby -- they just wanted control over everything.


The thought of Mrs. Gibson allowing O-the-ho to have any say in business or trusts is laughable.


Tee hee

1083 days ago
493.

middleagedcrazy    

Oh, I forgot --


There was some wealthy old guy who had a second (unmarried family) and the extramarital children had extensive support, etc. then sued his estate to get more. They lost big time.


Pretty sure that is a lesson. Will be interesting because Dirty Money Chucky has always made a big deal out of the Dalton child being his sole 'heir' -- and it sounds like she is trying to make the baby an 'heir' as well.


Tee hee

1083 days ago
494.

Swede    

I hope Oksana will leave Mel alone now! And not destroy his life even more.

1083 days ago
495.

THE BEAVER    

Ox--better remove these from your shopping list

Bladder chest lift
Buttock lift
Cheek implants
Chin augmentation
Facelift
Hair transplantation
Lip augmentation
Liposuction
Vaginal augmentation
Nose job
Botox injections
Cellulite treatment
Chemical peel
Dermabrasion
Laser treatment for skin resurfacing

Wow, and you would think she would get a singing career out of all that,or a rich husband.

1083 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web