TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Mel Gibson's Alleged Baby Mama

He's Not the Daddy, Case Closed

11/16/2011 9:40 AM PST BY TMZ STAFF

1116_mel_gibson_abilityfilms
The woman who was labelled by various gossip mags as Mel Gibson's baby mama tells TMZ ... it just ain't true ... blasting the "reports" as "lies and speculation."

Laura Bellizzi tells TMZ squarely, "Mel Gibson is not the father of my child."

Bellizzi -- who's a mother and a business woman -- adds through her rep  ... any "alleged friends" telling gossip outlets that she's been privately identifying Gibson as her baby daddy are "being 100% dishonest in a misguided effort to seek 5 seconds of notoriety and fame."

Bellizzi's rep continues, Laura is "greatly dismayed at the rash of intrusive and irresponsible stories about her pregnancy."


STATEMENT FROM LAURA BELLIZZI'S REP:

Ms. Bellizzi and her family are greatly dismayed at the rash of intrusive and irresponsible stories about her pregnancy.  Ms. Bellizzi considers the details of her pregnancy to be private, and does not intend to respond to the lies and speculation fueling the reckless  reports, beyond that which her attorney has already accurately disseminated.

"Mel Gibson is not the father of my child," Ms. Bellizzi claims, all though she acknowledges they know one another. However, the details pertaining to her level of past and/or present involvement with him are private.  

Additionally,  any alleged "friends" of Ms. Bellizzi claiming that she told them that Mr. Gibson "is the father" of her child are either misinterpreting her desire for privacy surrounding the identity of the father, or are being 100% dishonest in a mis-guided effort to seek 5 seconds of notoriety and fame.  Laura has never told any acquaintances or friends that Mel Gibson is the father of her child. That is total rubbish!

403 COMMENTS

No Avatar
91.

2idiots    

shirleyholmes: 4 minutes ago
Regardless of whether or not you feel you make up the "public" - WHAT DID SHE DO TO YOU PERSONALLY!
by 2idiots
----------
Well, her going public with it for instance, made it possible that 2 idiots are harassing me on this board, asking meaningless questions since they do not comprehend the answers given by me (and others) anyway.
lol
------------
Shirley,

If you or a Flock member could ANSWER THE QUESTION I asked perhaps I'd stop asking it. But since you can only use replies like "she took their private stuff public" - you have FAILED to answer a very simple question. The reason you wont answer my question is because you cant.
-
There is NOTHING that OG did to anyone here PERSONALLY (again a KEY WORD) that would cause the flock to rip her apart for over year. She didnt steal your man, she didnt burn your house down, she didnt punch you, she didnt call you over and over and over again, she didnt threaten you. SHE DID NOTHING TO YOU PERSONALLY.

979 days ago
92.

2idiots    

realist: 4 minutes ago
Move to strike as "non responsive", 2 Idiots. You called Sandusky a name, you wrote "F" JoPa, you implied that Sandusky will become a "wide receiver" and what's more, he deserves it.

You can't have it both ways, buddy. If you want to say bad things about a public figure who has done something wrong, you have no right to criticize anyone else who does the same thing.
----
OH PLEASE. You're grasping at the straw Sam cant keep in her mouth!
-
You're comparing apples to oranges. A man accused of RAPING BOYS is FAR DIFFERENT. YOu bot's are not programmed with logic.

979 days ago
93.

realist    

2Idiots, You're beating a dead horse. It's already been asked and answered. Get off your high horse. You're no better than anyone else.

979 days ago
94.

realist    

2Idiots, Your underlying premise is that posters should not be bashing Oxy because "she didn't do anything PERSONALLY" to anyone here. Sandusky didn't do anything to you, yet you feel justified in bashing him. It's called HYPOCRISY.


Don't mess with the Bull, buddy, you'll get the horns!


Yet you turn around and bash JoPa and Sandusky, and say it's "apples and oranges".

979 days ago
95.

shirleyholmes    


2Idiots, You're beating a dead horse. It's already been asked and answered. Get off your high horse. You're no better than anyone else.
by Realist
-----------------

Well, you know what they say:

you can take a horse to the water but you can not make it drink

Goodnight

979 days ago
96.

realist    

Oops, last sentence shouldn't be there.

979 days ago
97.

2idiots    


shirleyholmes: 6 minutes ago

2Idiots, You're beating a dead horse. It's already been asked and answered. Get off your high horse. You're no better than anyone else.
by Realist
-----------------
Well, you know what they say:
you can take a horse to the water but you can not make it drink
Goodnight
--------
Well Shirley, since SAM is the one who points out that it's not nice to talk about those you dont know, perhaps you and Realist should "lecture" her.

@ Realist, 20+ counts of child molestation and a huge cover-up at PSU is FAR different but I doubt you see it that way.

979 days ago
98.

realist    

@2Idiots, I frankly suggested the Ellie Nesler Solution to the Sandusky issue. And I don't apologize for it.


Your argument is that nobody should be saying anything about Oxy because no poster here has been harmed by her, and because we don't "know" her.


It doesn't matter what was done, publicly or privately, the issue is whether or not people should be saying uncomplimentary things about someone they don't know or have personally been affected by something they have done.

I submit that you have done the same thing, and are therefore, a HYPOCRITE.


Your logic is what needs to be examined.

979 days ago
99.

realist    

Excuse me, that should read "have NOT been personally affected".

979 days ago
100.

little aussie reader    


2idiots 286 days ago
"We, as adults, are free to comment as we please but remember one day Lucia will be old enough to read and she may uncover some very mean things that have been said about her parents. We should rise above the pettiness."

----------------------------------

You're doing a stand-up job of rising above.

----------------------------------
2idiots 286 days ago
"And another general question, why are some posters so mean to other posters? If someone posts something that others dont agree with, why not just let it go? Why try to pick a fight?"
---------------------------------

Indeed.

979 days ago
101.

realist    

And it's LAR to the rescue!!! Hi.

979 days ago
102.

2idiots    

realist: 5 minutes ago
@2Idiots, I frankly suggested the Ellie Nesler Solution to the Sandusky issue. And I don't apologize for it.

Your argument is that nobody should be saying anything about Oxy because no poster here has been harmed by her, and because we don't "know" her.

It doesn't matter what was done, publicly or privately, the issue is whether or not people should be saying uncomplimentary things about someone they don't know or have personally been affected by something they have done.
I submit that you have done the same thing, and are therefore, a HYPOCRITE.

Your logic is what needs to be examined.
------
HA! Call me a hypocrite all you want. That puts me in the same boat as the flock! Keep in mind Child Molestation (20+ counts) and a HUGE COVER-UP are far different then airing your personal dirty laundry. It almost makes me believe you're OK with Sandusky and those at PSU have done.

Keep in mind that OG is WINNNG thanks to those who have sought to destroy her for what she's done! Why? Because the FLOCK has refused to let go.
-
look at OG now...she's nowhere with virtually nothing and the Mel thread continue to come up and the same folks continue to talk about him.
-
and while we're "talking" about "the same folks" - take a look at the Sandusky thread and the Justin Bieber threads and Kim Kardashian threads....notice how many different monikers appear there versus the number of monikers on the MG threads. If you look you'll see very few post about MG (barring the flock of course). Makes you wonder about his um "popularity" (cough cough) doesn't it?

979 days ago
103.

little aussie reader    

Hiya realist

You don't need me to rescue you - you were holding your own very well. :o)

idiots is pissing in the wind, as usual.

979 days ago
104.

Bunny that earns scooby snacks!    

2idiots: WHAT did I say?

What is your question anyway?

979 days ago
105.

Karls    

2idiots you are not putting up a good argument dude.. Your getting roasted id be quitting right about now on that subject..

Hi guys hows things Mel is such a good Dad even if he had 100 kids he would still make each and everyone of them feel loved.. So whats the problem?

979 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web