TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Kim Kardashian

Did She Deserve a Dusting?

3/24/2012 11:30 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF

0323_kim_kardashian_splash_powder_2

The flour bomb unleashed by an animal rights activist against Kim Kardashian has also unleashed a raging debate over fur, and the tactics used by protesters. 

So we gotta ask...

272 COMMENTS

No Avatar
16.

horhay    

I think there is an error in one of the choices.."Kim is more sympathetic now" it should read "Kim is more pathetic now"..

883 days ago
17.

me    

Every time I see a picture of this ho I have to pee.

883 days ago
18.

two cents    

What I don't understand is Kloe did an ad for "I'd rather go bare than wear fur" yet her sister wears furs all the time. Kloe saw how animals were skinned alive and did the promotion so you would assume Kim wouldn't wear them. A tramp in a fur coat is still a tramp.

883 days ago
19.

she    

It's obvious tmz gets paid by the kardashians. Otherwise, why wouldn't there be a vote on this whole thing being staged? Flour? We all know that real peta uses red paint. Also the way she was dressed, I've never seen her covered head to toe with so much clothes. A normal person would be horrified if a stranger had thrown something on them. Kim is Kris' meal ticket. Mommie didn't seem worried about it.

883 days ago
20.

Yaz    

I think she did. She actually looks like Michael Jackson in this pic. (sorry Michael)

883 days ago
21.

Troy Teixeira    

I'm glad that she was dusted. I'm tired of seeing her stuck-up ass non-stop. What does she have to offer anyone? What's she done for society? Nothing. She rakes in tons of money from all the suckers who watch her dumb ass shows and who follow her snotty family. I'll be happy once people get sick of her and she runs out of money because of it.

883 days ago
22.

Dani    

Didn't sister Khloe do a add for PETA a couple of years ago?? This was a PR Stunt brought to us by the Ktrash family in order to bring Kimmie Kakes ratings up and me make us feel sorry for her. Sorry she got cleaned up to fast and the smiles on her and mama pimps faces afterwards were way to phony. TMZ how much is mama pimp paying you for all your pro-Ktrash articles!

883 days ago
23.

janet    

i can't believe the amount of ignorant people that have been commenting. the fault lies soley on the the fur distributors. how come they don't flour bomb beyonce or jennifer lopez. they both wear fur. why doesn't peta stand outside of the stores that sell it. i'm sure most of you wear leather shoes,carry leather handbags, etc. i'm also sure that you go to church on sundays and repent but come monday you spew your hate towards ms. kardashian. shame on you!!!!!

883 days ago
24.

Rebecca    

If it were wrong to eat or use animals for fur or leather, then we would have to prosecute animals for eating each other and for rape, etc. But, we don't. Yes, they may be sentient, but that does not make them moral agents who have rights and obligations as do people. If it were suddenly on a new reading of morality considered wrong to breathe air, I would not quit breathing. So, with this view that animals are morally equivalent to people and to be accorded the same rights. This new "view" which can't really be logically substantiated, does not make it the case that being vegan or vegetarian is a healthier diet. it takes only 5 years for spinal injury to occur in those who eat no animal products. Certain nutrients can only be gotten from animal sources. Something that is not properly possible can not be required morally of one. Thus, it is not morally required to abstain from eating meat. Actually, in terms of healthy blood sugar levels and preventing obesity and diabetes, an omnivore diet is preferable. Further, fur is a renewable resource and is not environmentally polluting and does not "off-gas" after production like synthetics. it is natural, very warm and environmental. We are all part of the world--people and animals, and we all have our roles in the ecosystem. Fur and meat and fish and foul and leather are great natural resources.

883 days ago
25.

The King    

It is Kim's personal choice to wear fur and it has nothing to do with anyone else.

Just remember, Hippies are worse han Pirates.

This comment was written while chillin' on my chinchilla bedspread... Screw you PETA!

The KING from KING Says

883 days ago
26.

kr    

does that person know how many wheat plants that were killed so she could pull this prank? Scientific studies show plants have pain. WTG nutty

883 days ago
27.

Cheri    

fur should be banned, and so should all the Kardashians. I wish it would have been something a bit worse then flour

883 days ago
28.

Beatrice    

This is obviously a publicity stunt! Why does no one see that. This is a ploy for her to gain sympathy, and turn around the bad press. She did not press charges, hello?
Please stop writing about that no talent bore!

883 days ago
29.

Beatrice    

This is obviously a publicity stunt! Why does no one see that. This is a ploy for her to gain sympathy, and turn around the bad press. She did not press charges, hello?
Please stop writing about that no talent bore!

883 days ago
30.

jack     

they should have followed thru with a bucket of animal dung, well done. It's sad that so little happens in LA these days that all you have to report about is a porn star. Where is the real celebrity news?

883 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web