Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Kevin Costner Sued

You'll NEVER

Take This Beach!

6/19/2012 11:30 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
breaking news

File this under: "The Problems of VERY Rich People."

Kevin Costner has been dragged into a nasty legal war with his neighbor in Carpinteria, CA -- an upscale beach community near Santa Barbara.

Long story short -- the neighbor, Rick Grimm, claims he bought a SICK beach property back in 2009 with KILLER views of the ocean and coastline ... and it happens to be located right behind Costner's pad.

Problem is ... the neighbor claims Costner is paranoid about his privacy and planted a bunch of trees and shrubs to make sure nobody from Grimm's property can see into his home ... trees which are now blocking Grimm's once-spectacular view.

Grimm filed a lawsuit, obtained by, claiming he TRIED to play nice -- sending multiple requests to Kevin and his wife to trim the hedges -- but the Costners blew him off ... and planted even TALLER trees.

Grimm says Costner is contractually bound to NOT plant trees which obstruct Grimm's view ... but Kevin doesn't care. According to the suit, Kevin made it clear to Rick's people he would not "back down" and would "do everything in his power to secure his privacy."

Grimm is now asking a judge to force Kevin to chop down his trees ... PLUS he wants at least $150,000 in damages for loss of enjoyment and $500k for damage to his property value if the trees don't come down.

A rep for Costner had no comment.


No Avatar


What does Kevin do on his deck he is so ashamed of?

858 days ago

BU Girl    

I used to live on that street, Beach Club Rd. Costner is a great neighbor- even helped put out a neighbor's house that was on fire. He has to live w/ a public (association only) beach access right against his home, and is very cool about it. This guy bought there knowing there were trees- Costner's been there A LOT longer!! Deal w/ it DUDE..

858 days ago


The neighbor won't get a dime in court, but can force Kevin to trim his trees. He is entitled to his view plus his house does lose value without that view if he were to sell it. Also, if there is a homeowners association, Keven will have to abide by those rules to not block a view.

858 days ago


Costner Wins!!!

I read the complaint and there is no scenic easement language in the CC&R's.

The Plaintiff is suing under the hedge clause when it is clearly the pine trees & large bird of paradise trees that are obstructing his view.

I doubt if this will make it past a couple of hearings... But it's California and you never know

858 days ago


Costner can do whatever he wants with his property - planting trees is quite legal. Neighbor is a fool, lawsuit is bogus. Next time buy on the beach, not one lot back from it!

858 days ago


I am for the buyer of the house. Sorry Costner you are lowing this mans price of his house because now it does not have a view.. BLINDS ARE CHEAPER THEN A LAWSUIT

858 days ago

Glory Bee    

View equity is VERY important to the value of properties like Mr. Grimm's. It is common practice to have restrictions in place regarding planting and building that would compromise the view of existing properties. These restrictions are always spelled out in real estate contracts. In viewing the photo I can assure you that those trees could be correctly topped and pruned to satisfy both Mr. Grimm's view and Mr. Costners privacy. In fact, done correctly the pruning would result in denser growth on the trees assuring even better privacy. Mr. Costner...trim the trees.

858 days ago


500k for loss of enjoyment? You can really do that? then I'll be suing the ex husband who never satisfied me.

858 days ago

Glory Bee    

"View Equity" is BIG in ocean view properties. It is not uncommon for there to be restrictions on planting or building that would obstruct the view of an existing property. Those trees could easily be trimmed to provide both Mr. Grimm's view and Mr. Costner's privacy. In fact, the correct topping and tipping of those trees would help develop denser growth thereby providing added privacy for Mr. Costner. Kevin...trim the trees.

858 days ago


Story broken by Santa Barbara View and the picture crop taken from the filing should be properly cited Santa Barbara View. You can read the whole complaint at

858 days ago


Costner is just a prick! I hope the neighbor wins.

858 days ago


Story broken by Santa Barbara View and that picture should be cited. You can read the whole complaint at

858 days ago


eh - the trees do suck...but, are ya KIDDIN me?! go find a REAL problem to deal w please.

858 days ago


That does stink that Costner took away the guy's view. Why do Celebritites act like they are the only people on Earth that matter? So selfish.

There are others that live around you Celebritites too that are just as important and equal to you, you are not above anyone else, why do some of you act like you are?

What right does Costner have to take away someone's beach view like that? It would bring down the value of that guy's house.

So wrong. So selfish of Costner to only think of himself.

858 days ago


Celebrities and personalities aside, the tradition of blocking your neighbors' view out of spite is a long one. Just google on "Spite house," for instance (and yes, I understand these are houses, not trees. Same effect). As Wikipedia paraphrases Edward T. Hall in his excellent book The Hidden Dimension, "cutting off a view is enough to make a house like a tomb." Also, there is such a thing as a view ordinance in some areas, according to, to "protect a property owner from having his view obstructed by growing trees." It sounds like Grimm has a legitimate complaint, IMHO.

858 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Around The Web