Michelle Obama -- Inaugural Ball Gown Battle: Who'd You Rather?

If Obama goes longer than five minutes without thanking God, someone at Fox News accuses him of religious warfare. If he hides an egg too prominently, they consider it an insurgent strike against Easter. If he wears pants, the Fox headline reads, "Obama Hiding Paddle Marks Given by Erotic Kenyan Deathgods?" They tell viewers every day how persecuted they are as Christians, but they share the most common religion in a country where you're allowed to worship anything. In fact, the only way a Christian can really suffer in America is by spending hours every day searching news feeds for any scrap of Christian persecution. So I guess from their strange perspective, being a Christian is, in fact, a pain in the ass. Oh yeah......FIRST!!!!

This "woman" is a nasty American hating pig. May the voices from beyond destroy her, her muslim husband and the muslim hoard who brought them here. ..

Choice #3 - neither.

How come we never have "neither" as an option?

SHE'S FUGLY IN BOTH!!

The red gown looks stunning. It looks nice againts her skin. Great contrast

NEITHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bangs always wins

Yuck so NASTY!

Why isn't there a "none of the above"?

Neither. She's got a really weird body. Skinny arms and calves but has a big stomach, thunder thighs and a way too big tush.

She wears those belts to draw attention away from the lower half of her body.

she is hateful. bossy. bow legged and
has a face like a boxer dog.

Looks SOOOO gracious, But that new do gotta go.

Who gives a rats butt about her dress, hair, arms, etc. Never have I heard such crap about a first lady. Kissing and information about their relationship. It's inappropriated, much less gross. Just try to do a much better job these four years, the last just about killed us.

Since when did all this become a fashion show? Shame on Michelle for shaming America