TMZ

Our TV Shows

Got a Tip?

Call TMZ at (888) 847-9869 or Click Here

Charlie Sheen to Judge

Jon Cryer Did it Right!

Brooke Deserves Zip for Child Support

7/11/2013 11:20 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
EXCLUSIVE

0711-charlie-sheen-jon-cryer-brooke-mueller-tmz-article-2
Charlie Sheen is using his old "Two and a Half Men" co-star Jon Cryer to try to convince the courts that Brooke Mueller's child support payment should be reduced from $55,000/month to ZERO ... TMZ has learned.

As TMZ first reported ... Charlie filed documents requesting the massive change in child support because Brooke currently doesn't have custody of their boys, Bob and Max ... while she's in and out of rehab.

In the docs, Charlie references Cryer's divorce -- where his ex-wife was arrested in 2009 for alleged child abuse and temporarily lost custody of their son.

Charlie says Cryer requested his support payments "be reduced from $10,000 per month to zero" -- and the court did lower the amount of support ... thereby setting a precedent, Charlie feels, for his current situation with Brooke.

The docs also list some astronomical financial details, such as the fact Charlie earns more than $740,000 per month (before taxes) -- and has more than $90,000/month in expenses on all his homes.

By the way, that $55k isn't all Brooke gets each month -- according to Charlie he also foots the bill for ALL the kids' expenses ... including therapy, medical, schooling, and more -- for a grand total of $30,000/month.

It's clear Charlie's point to the court is -- Brooke doesn't need the the $55k anyway.

0515_charlie_sheen_brooke_mueller_happier_times_footer

82 COMMENTS

No Avatar
31.

Colonel Custard    

Give this girl some knee pads, some lotion, and plenty of water. The only way she'll contribute anything to society is if she spends the rest of her life on her knees giving out hummers and handies.

435 days ago
32.

HumanNature    

CHARLIE IS "WINNING"!!!!!

435 days ago
33.

Glenda     

Part of why she can afford her drug habit is because of the money he pays towards the twins. I agree with not paying her while she in rehab or while she herself doesn't have the children and I think it would be a good decision by the judge to suspend the support until she's clean and sober for over a year. If he's paying for schools, medical, etc....then why pay the child-support.

435 days ago
34.

Kiranda    

And giving her money cramps Charlie's style how? Does he need to buy MORE drugs?

435 days ago
35.

Thunderchicken    

If you don't have the kids in your custody, you don't get the CHILD support payments. I guess there could be exceptions like idk if you were hospitalized for illness for a brief period? But still...

435 days ago
36.

pattycakes not to be confused with pattycake    

I think she was raised an entitled and luxurious life because her ma married a billionaire. I think she is worse than CS because he isn't totally crazy but she is. Just look at her eyes.

435 days ago
37.

STR    

'Charlie he also foots the bill for ALL the kids' expenses ... including therapy, medical, schooling, and more -- for a grand total of $30,000/month.'

That is what child support is...what the hell is the other $55K for? Looks like drugs

435 days ago
38.

goofball89    

OOh CHARLIE!! everybody watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leMQIQAkZ0I its hilarious $hit!

435 days ago
39.

WTF?    

I don't understand why do you need to have a court case its pretty obvious you dont need a mountain of paperwork to put your argument accross, just a post it note saying this.

No children = no right to child support cash.

Its not rocket science the clue is in the name child support, she's not a child just a useless moronic golddigger, get a job if you want to keep shoving coke up your nose you deadbeat.

434 days ago
40.

JennA    

One thing this story fails to mention is the outcome of Jon Cryer's child support case. Jon requested that his child support payment be reduced from 10k to 0, but it wasn't. It was only lowered to 8k/month. And keep in mind, Jon has FULL custody of his son. When you factor in the difference between what Charlie and Jon earn, this hardly seems like the example that Charlie would want the court to follow.

434 days ago
41.

Sapphiegirl    

CHARLIE'S RIGHT...THE STATE WON'T ALLOW BRROK TO HAVE CUSTODY OF THOSE KIDS. CHARLIES SHOULD JUST GIVE THE MONEY TO DENISE WHO IS ACUTALLY RAISING HIS OTHER BABY MAMA'S KIDS ALONG WITH HER OWN

434 days ago
42.

karie mclaughlin    

I totally agree with Charlie why should he pay child support to a childless mother. If anything he should be giving that to Denise Richards, she's the one that's caring for them!!!!!!

434 days ago
43.

740k    

Im gonna do what charlie does and get 740k amonth **** im in the wrong biz

424 days ago
Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3

Around The Web