Lets Get This Party Started
Let's Get This Party Started: Top Stories for Tuesday 06/27/06

Lindsay Lohan is such a tireless party girl that even her entourage can't keep up. The fiery flame-haired actress rocked New York so hard last week that a stylist she flew out from LA to accompany her had to bail and go back home.



Stylist Nate Newell was hired by Lohan to help her out as she promoted "A Prairie Home Companion" last week in Manhattan. But, according to this morning's Page Six, Newell found out that hanging with the 19-year-old Lohan in Gotham isn't child's play: She was spotted at Bungalow 8 every night, danced at PM, whooped it up at Marquee, and got into well-publicized spats with Paris Hilton and even P. Diddy at Butter and elsewhere -- and that was just at night.

It was all a bit much for Newell, who had to get cash from friends to buy a ticket home. Lohan was apparently none too happy about being ditched because after he left, according to Page Six, she text-messaged her friends, "[Newell] is dead to me," and is making him pay for his travel and lodging expenses.

All of which, of course, Lohan's very busy publicist Leslie Sloane Zelnick (who also reps Britney) says is bunk, telling the Post: "Please. Nate ... had a great time. He had to get back to Los Angeles for work. There was no drama whatsoever."

Rush Limbaugh Detained With Little Blue Pills

Right-wing radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh found himself in a slightly embarrassing situation Monday when he was held by authorities at the Palm Beach International Airport with a bottle of Viagra that didn't have his name on it.

Customs officials found a prescription bottle of the erectile dysfunction treatment in Limbaugh's luggage, but its label had two doctors' names on it rather than Rush's. According to Limbaugh's lawyer, Roy Black, the drugs were prescribed for Limbaugh but the bottle was "labeled as issued to the physician rather than Mr. Limbaugh for privacy purposes."

There was no word on Tuesday morning as to whether the latest incident, which could result in a second-degree misdemeanor, would affect a deal Limbaugh made last month with prosecutors to settle a case involving overlapping painkiller prescriptions.

No More Room on "View" for Star

We may not get to see Rosie and Star claw it out after all: Star Jones is planning to leave ABC's "The View," and according to Lloyd Grove, she's already signed a "lucrative deal" with another television outlet.

Former lawyer Star has already met with CBS, Court TV, and E! about a new destination, and since making her decision has been "on cloud nine ... She's been acting as though she doesn't have a care in the world. That's why she was so pleasant, even when Sandra Bernhard was trying to bait her for a confrontation on the show."

Speaking of confrontations, speculation has been rampant about what Jones would do when O'Donnell arrived on the set this September, after O'Donnell pricked her about her weight loss in the press, saying that her recent book was "like selling bulls -- to the point that it's sickening." Barbara Walters nor anyone else at "The View" had comment on the reports.



Naomi Sued Again by Another Servant -- Appears in Court Today

Naomi Campbell is being sued by yet another of her domestic help, just as she is appearing in Manhattan Criminal Court on charges of assaulting a maid.

A terse filing in state Supreme Court says that Gaby Gibson is accusing the supermodel of "personal injuries," "employment discrimination," "civil assault," "civil battery," and other complaints. No particular acts were mentioned, but Gibson has said in a published interview that Campbell was upset about her not being able to find a pair of jeans.

Which, of course, is what allegedly made her so upset that she bashed Ana Scolavino on the back of her head with a jewel encrusted Blackberry, the charge for which she is appearing in court this morning. Campbell faces up to seven years in prison and deportation if convicted. No comment was available from her lawyers.

Rowling says Harry Potter Could Die in Final Book

Younger children may want to turn away from this item: J.K. Rowling hinted yesterday on British TV that she may kill off Harry Potter in the last installment of the hugely successful series of books that have made her Britain's richest woman. "I have never been tempted to kill him off before the final because I've always planned seven books, and I want to finish on seven books," Rowling said. She says she finished the final chapter in "something like 1990," and, exercising somewhat questionable control over her own narrative, that two of the characters die "that I didn't intend to die."

But Rowling also said she didn't want any sequels written by others and so the seventh book will be the final one -- and as a result, young Harry might meet also his end. Regardless of what happens to Harry in the books, the fifth film based on the Rowling books -- "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" will arrive in US theaters in July 2007.

"Frasier"'s Terrier Passes Away

Moose, the constant canine sidekick to John Mahoney and Kelsey Grammer known as "Eddie," passed away last week, according to PEOPLE magazine.

The spunky Jack Russell terrier, who was 16-and-a-half years old and who we once had the privilege to spend a few minutes with at Universal Studios several years ago, died of old age. Though Moose had a starring role in the 2002 heartwarmer "My Dog Skip" with Frankie Muniz, he will be best remembered for his scene-stealing antics with the therapists and their grumpy dad on the long-running NBC sitcom "Frasier."

Tags: Let's Get This Party Started, Let'sGetThisPartyStarted, Lindsay Lohan, LindsayLohan

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 5) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. all i can say if rawlings kills harry potter or qny of the decent characters inthis last section i will throw all her works out and i will not pay to see the movie she has made all this money . i will protest the movie and any further monies she may get . she will get much more hate mail as she stated this morning . she has turned out to be a terrible dissapointment now that she has made her millions at our expense . i will buy nothing more of hers and will protest sales of her books and anything else connected that would bring her more profits

Posted at 10:47AM on Jun 27th 2006 by mark yoder

2. Who CARES if she kills him off. She WROTE him. I personally think it would be a fabulous end to the books. I've suspected it since the fourth book.

Posted at 11:12AM on Jun 27th 2006 by Kari

3. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but...she wrote that last chapter of the final installment in the early 90's so I don't think it's fair to say she is doing it now that she made millions at our expense.

Posted at 11:33AM on Jun 27th 2006 by Sue

4. re: comment#1 Mark....ummmmm....ever read "Misery" or see the film? chill out...Harry Potter is a FICTIONAL character...that means HE DOESNT REALLY EXIST....yikes.

Posted at 12:22PM on Jun 27th 2006 by R.

5. I don't think Rowling will kill Harry in the final book. She said in that interview that she understands why authors choose to kill their main characters because it prevents anyone else from writing sequels to their books using characters that they had created. It makes sense, but it's also cheap. You should tell stories the way they were meant to be told and not change the outcome to protect your investment because you don't want anyone to make money off your ideas. If she was that worried about control then she shouldn't have sold the rights to the characters. Of course, then she wouldn't be a Billionaire. She has stated many times that she looooves Harry, he is her favorite character and I just can't see her killing him off. She has to know she would be hated for all time after that. I don't remember her actually saying that Harry might die, I thought all she said was that she understood why authors do it. What she did say is that as of now 2 characters she had not originally planned to kill will die and that 1 person who she had planned on dying will now live. And that because of that, she has had to tweak the final chapter that she wrote back in the 90's. I assume that's just for now, though, since she hasn't finished writing the book yet. Whatever she chooses to do, I will be a loyal fan forever. I can't wait for the next book but it will be so sad to see it all end.

Posted at 12:38PM on Jun 27th 2006 by Diane

6. Unless you're a 12 yr old, who cares if she kills off Harry???

Posted at 1:27PM on Jun 27th 2006 by melissa

7. get a grip people...

it's FICTION

lol bitches :)

Posted at 1:35PM on Jun 27th 2006 by herbiefrog

8. I think you are all focusing too much on Harry and not the most important headline....Moose had died!!! Poor little guy.

Posted at 2:08PM on Jun 27th 2006 by Danielle

9. I think it is unreal that the harry potter stuff is so stretched out over so many years. It is unreal that this whole series is taking so many years. I have 4 boys and we have the books and all the movies but all the years between is just unreal and my kids are really getting sick of waiting and getting bored with it and really not into it as much as they use to be. I like harry potter don't get me wrong but it is just getting too drawn out and taking too many years. 2 stars

Posted at 2:34PM on Jun 27th 2006 by Purpleladylisa

10. Harry is a Hero, call me sentimental but I think the Hero should live.

Posted at 2:39PM on Jun 27th 2006 by Pat

11. well.. Im a trek fan, so when they killed off captain kirk, I could not go see it. I have all mthe other movies though.So I would not want to see harry die. I have seen all the movies with my kid and would like to see the last ,but.. it is up to the writer. I just hope she does not do him in.

Posted at 2:39PM on Jun 27th 2006 by sue

12. #8 is right. I have thoroughly enjoyed watching "Eddie" for many years and am saddened by his death. He has caused me to laugh out loud numerous times, which is what the world could use more of these days. Who cares about a FICTIONAL character's demise...........life needs more laughter.

Posted at 2:44PM on Jun 27th 2006 by Janet

13. I really think that comment #1 has way too much time on his/her hands...Its a book...Get a life...I think it would be interesting to kill Harry off..it would make a great movie and a great end to her books..

Posted at 2:46PM on Jun 27th 2006 by Sarah

14. Star Jones is so irritating! ackkkkk! Too bad she got another job in the public view..........

RIP Moose.

Posted at 2:47PM on Jun 27th 2006 by barngoddess

15. Oh No :-(


Posted at 2:51PM on Jun 27th 2006 by pPixiePowers.com

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments