Golden Gals Gone Wild

1. Um, ew!

Posted at 11:40AM on Aug 1st 2007 by MaisyMousey

2. NO NO NO NO NO...SWEET JESUS NO

Posted at 11:41AM on Aug 1st 2007 by BLUJAE

3. Each to their own, I suppose, but what is with the ugly chick holding the portrait.

Talk about being hit with the 'Ugly Stick'!

Posted at 11:42AM on Aug 1st 2007 by Next Stop...Psych Ward

4. I bet her real boobies hang down to her knees.

Posted at 11:42AM on Aug 1st 2007 by Blue Eyes

5. You are crazy the chick with the orange hair is hot.

Posted at 11:46AM on Aug 1st 2007 by Buddy

6. Bea wishes she had a rack like that!

Posted at 11:48AM on Aug 1st 2007 by Dawn Day

7. I have to know - are the real Golden Girls aware of this? I think this is in horrible taste, portraying a respectable elderly woman in such a fashion. If Bea Arthur approved of this, I guess more power to her. Otherwise, I hope she sues. How tasteless. I sure wouldn't appreciate someone doing that to my picture.

Posted at 11:56AM on Aug 1st 2007 by Just Me

8. It must be catching on as "alternative art". ebay just reported a listing of the same type
"topless" painting in oil, of Betty White.
It was already up to $1,498. and had 63 bids on it when some guy named Billy Williams from Oxford, Alabama hit the BUY IN NOW for $2,800.

KC for Celeb NEWS by E!

Posted at 12:05PM on Aug 1st 2007 by Celeb News by E!

9. Good god---- my eyes are bleeding.
Whats next?... Sophia's Vajayjay in pink, green, and white watercolors?

Posted at 3:41PM on Aug 1st 2007 by blacklab

10. Awesome! xoxo

Posted at 12:12PM on Aug 1st 2007 by Thistle

11. What no velvet Estelle Getty full frontal on a bearskin rug?

Posted at 12:18PM on Aug 1st 2007 by DLC

12. That is SO cool. I think this is the same person who did that painting of Amy Sedaris as superhero She-Ra.

Posted at 12:18PM on Aug 1st 2007 by Ace

13. the girl holding the painting is the girl who curated the show. She loves the Golden Girls and is not in any way making fun of those Golden Girls!
She is trying to expose people to ART! So don't be a fool, be there August 11th and see what it is all about!

Posted at 12:25PM on Aug 1st 2007 by d.w.

14. If being totally direspectful to another human being is art, then her artist have succeeded. However, I would suggest to her , that they go back to art school. Perhaps study color theory? Human anatomy, and definatly technique. Or is this a new school of Velvet Elvis portrature art?
The quality of her work is sensationally laughable.

She loves the Golden girls? Show them some decency and respect then. This is embarrasing to watch. And most decidedly exploitive.

She is exposing people to art? You are a fool if you champion that statement. She is trying to expose her concept to buyers... it's called marketting... At the expense of the Golden
Girls. Privacy and personal dignity.

There is great art everywhere you look. Art that makes you think and feel....... I guess your right this art makes me think of the embarrassment, pain and exploitating these actress will have to endure. It makes me feel disgust at the "Artist" who seeks to exploit, manipulate and market a false image of the subject. And makes me think "You have got to be kidding me.... theres a sucker born every minute" Who would buy this crap?

Lenora, I hope that after a lifetime of work in the public eye, entertaining people, being mothers and grandmothers some other opportunist will come around and exploit you the way that you have exploited them. And I hope that this causes you the same sensations these ladies will endure because of your "devotion" . I hope that his makes you lots of infamy and money, and mostly I hope that Bea Arthur is the first one to sue you for every penny you will ever make.

That is my wish for you!

Posted at 1:36AM on Aug 2nd 2007 by Ted

15. Whoah! Bea Arthur's got nice man boobs!

Posted at 12:53PM on Aug 1st 2007 by LardyRevenger