Kato Comes Clean

91. White Girl--
There is nothing interesting about people who are devoid of color (like things that live in the darkness) People who need lip implants, butt implants and tons of plastic surgery to look human...What are you? Where'd you come from? And if by interesting you mean people who've ripped off every nation on the planet and claimed their assets as their own, and the majority of the pedophiles, murderers, liars, rapists, psycopaths, serial killers, and those who commit suicide and oh yeah... anorexics...Thank God I'm brown and boring.

Posted at 12:08AM on Dec 16th 2006 by mimi

92. Interesting Mimi, in that every day another black is executed for some horrendous killing, usually an entire family of victims. Our jails are bursting at the seems with black inmates. What is the figure now, something like 2/3 of black males are in jail, on probation or parole? Plastic surgery? Like Star Jones or every member of the Jackson family? Why do blacks straighten their hair and lighten their skin. Who the hell is having butt implants? Some white women want to improve their appearance, yes, but it sure as fu*k isn't to look like your average black girl. Open any magazine and tell me what you see.
Oh yeah, and the ripping off of every nation-like who? We claimed America from the Indians, it's called survival of the fittest. Name one, just ONE nation ruled by blacks that is not in a total state of chaos. Even when blacks are the majority as in South Africa they don't rule over whites. What's your point? Like blacks wouldn't do the same if they could? You should get down on your hands and knees every night and thank God you ended up here, otherwise you'd be just another starving girl living in a hut dodging spears from rival tribesman. Now if you'll excuse me I have to go wash my long, shiny beautiful blonde hair.........

Posted at 12:46AM on Dec 16th 2006 by Blondie

93. Yes, he must be "nice". Nice guys help their friends get away with
double murders. If he knew more, which he's obviously admitting he
did, they should charge his ass for Accessory After The Fact!!!!!!

Posted at 1:45AM on Dec 16th 2006 by hollywoodgirl

94. it's "lede," not "lead."

thank you for your time.

Posted at 6:54AM on Dec 16th 2006 by no one important

95. so you're saying that OJ was actually guilty? and a witness didn't include everything he knew in his testimony? fascinating.

did you also happen to notice that nicole ritchie is kind of thin?

Posted at 12:09AM on Dec 19th 2006 by r.e. byrnes

96. Mr. Levin:

In response to to your article entitled "Kato Comes Clean", you have misstated all of the "facts" you make reference to.

You state:

[Kaelin was asked about Simpson's disgusting book, "If I Did It." His response -- "What do you mean 'if'?"]

You then state at the end of your article:

[So, when Kato nixed the word "if" last night, it's the most honest he's been about the murders in a dozen years.]

In making your statement about Kaelin's remark, you leave the impression that this is the first time Kaelin has indicated that he thinks Simpson was the killer.

But in fact, Kaelin has said on numerous occasions since the trial that he now believes that Simpson killed the two victims. (Geraldo Rivera show, Larry King show, etc.)
This fact makes the entire premise of your article false.

You then state to us:

[The criminal and civil trials were my life for two years. I covered it for the CBS affiliate in L.A. and it was the only topic in my life. Trust me, Kato knew a lot more than he told. Remember, he claims that he was awakened by a thump that shook the walls of the guesthouse -- that was Simpson hitting the A.C.]

Stop right there Mr. Levin! At no time did Kaelin testify that he "was awakened by a thump...".

Here is what Kaelin really said:

He testified that he was on the phone talking to his friend Rachel when he heard the three (not "a") thumps. He then asked her if there had just been an earthquake. She said that she hadn't felt anything. They talked for a while longer and then Kaelin said that he was going to look around outside and that he was "scared". His friend Rachel testified to the same facts and added that they had talked another 7 minutes. Even if Rachel is mistaken about 7 minutes, and they only talked for 3 more minutes, this puts the lie to Ms. Clark's time-line change putting the thumps at 10:52 in that the phone call ended at 10:43 making it impossible for Kaelin and Rachel to be discussing "thumps" 10 to 12 minutes before they happen. Also, there is no evidence that Simpson hit the air conditioner in that there was no disturbance of the leaves or ground in that area, no blood trail there, and no marks or bruises on Simpson's body indicating that he had bumped into anything.

And then Mr. Levin, you state the following:

[At the very least, O.J. Simpson was in a rage after getting snubbed by Nicole, and he was always willing to rant even when people weren't in the mood to listen. Kato the houseguest was obligated to listen.]

The video tape evidence, Mr. Levin, proves exactly the opposite. In the video tape shot after the dance recital, and unbeknownst to Mr. Simpson, Denice Brown and her mother are seen hugging and kissing Simpson, Mr. Brown is seen putting things into the trunk of his car as he is smiling and laughing with Simpson, and Dr. Fischman and Simpson are seen laughing and joking together. There is no sign of any rage on Simpson's part. Kaelin testified that there was no anger in Simpson's comments about the way Nicole was dressed at the dance recital, regardless of the constant pounding by Marsha Clark.

And finally you state:

[And one more thing -- there's no doubt in my mind that Kato heard a lot of commotion after Simpson left for the airport. Double murder is a messy business, and there was plenty to clean and discard that night. I don't think Kato was part of the cleaning crew, but I think he knew exactly who was.]

What is it with you Mr. Levin? Are you so prejudiced in this case that you simply make up any story you please, whether or not it is supported by any facts? Yes, double murder is a messy business, but apparently, not messy enough to leave any blood on the white carpet in Simpson's house, or any blood trail near the glove, or any indication the Simpson had been in a confrontation with two people who were fighting for their lives. And how do you know what Kaelin knows or doesn't know? And what is your evidence that there was a cleaning crew? And just when was such a crew contacted? And if they were supposed to clean up and take away the clothes, the knife, the shoes, and any stains, why did Simpson call Kaelin and ask him to put the alarm on? And why didn't that crew clean up the blood drops on the driveway, and carefully look around and find and collect the glove so it wouldn't be found by the police? Please show us the evidence Sir. We would like to see it!

But you say there is no doubt in your mind. Obviously, the problem here has to do with your mind -- you suffer from delusions Sir. And yet, you tell us to trust you because this case was the only topic in your life for two years. No Mr. Levin. We can't trust you because you haven't stated one single fact correctly in your entire article. You accuse Mr. Simpson of ranting, but it is you Sir, who rants. Your reckless and irresponsible ranting serves neither the Law, the Public, nor Justice.

Patrick Valentino

Posted at 1:58AM on Dec 20th 2006 by Patrick Valentino

97. Kato is worthless

Posted at 6:41PM on Dec 23rd 2006 by Disgust

98. Mr. Pat Valentino is absolutely correct.

This entire media circus around OJ Simpson and the unsolved murders of Ron and Nicole has done more to obfuscate the truth than anything else.

The prosecution had not a shred of evidence to convict OJ Simpson and yet the media made this case out to be the biggest murder case in all known human history.

The legal case was a fraud and it was intended to be a fraud. The media pretended that this was an open and shut case, that Simpson was guilty of murder. This is so far from the truth.

The jury in the criminal case was not subjected to the constant media barrage and as a result they returned a "not guilty" verdict in under 4 hours of deliberation. That should be the end of it as far as OJ Simpson's guilt is concerned.

Without the media there is no way to conclude Simpson as the guilty party in this case. It is more than likely a murder which required more than one person to commit.

This whole case stinks. OJ Simpson murdered no one, not his ex-wife nor Ron Goldman.

Hollywood's history is rife with Satanic killings. The Cotton Club murders in 1983, the Manson case in 1969 etc. For my money this is exactly what happened once again on June 12th 1994 in Brentwood.

The media (which is part and parcel of Hollywood and is run by these little satanic creatures) is covering up for the proclivities of some of their better known and influential members.

OJ Simpson killed no one. End of story.

Posted at 11:55AM on Feb 10th 2007 by Jack