Paris Prays for Strength

451. Post Changer #475...you only hope and dream you'd know someone as beautiful and intelligent as #465. By the way, I'm far from Ugly / Fat you .blank blank! And another thing don't mess with my name or my post entry again......I've got a life...I suggest you get one. Or at least some serious therapy...cause you are just sick attention seeking jerk!

Posted at 9:00PM on Jun 17th 2007 by Karin B.

452. leave her alone.
i'm sure all you guys do the same thing.
you are just picking on her because shes famous for it!

Posted at 10:42PM on Jun 18th 2007 by amanda

453. maybe she should pray for the fallen firefighters here in SC

Posted at 4:37PM on Jun 20th 2007 by Charleston SC

454. For quite some time, the TMZ website has been inundated with hypercritical postings regarding Paris Hilton and her family. These postings have outweighed any of the unprejudiced, constructive comments, or information serving the public interest; by a very long chalk. They have consisted, for the most part, of irrelevancies, assumptions, unadulterated poppycock, hypotheticals, and salacious smut.

Amongst this public onslaught, a few objective postings featured a catalogue of “facts” detailing the progression of events from the original apprehension of Paris to the legal proceedings, her non-compliance to judicial matters of form, et cetera, and finally to her incarceration. Although these “facts” cannot be denied, as they are on the court records, police files, and in ‘public information’, they are only part of the proceedings.

Public opinion is deduced from editorial controlled media reports. Media reports, for pragmatic purposes ( amongst others ), omit publishing entire proceedings; as in the Hilton case. Unpublished facts underpinning the basis of the judge’s final decision of law ( i.e., the conviction and sentence ) included the entire proceedings between the defence and prosecution, admissible medical or psychiatric evidence, and in all probability, pre-sentence reports, with recommendations, et cetera. These factors of the proceedings were quite conspicuously absent, subsequently public opinion was formed from only the limited known “facts”.

Paris was then incarcerated, after which some anomalous circumstance occurred shortly afterwards, that brought an additional wave of public abuse against her, the district attorney, and the sheriff. Those bent on assassinating the characters of others, in these circumstances, ought to refer to Article Four, Sec. 2, l.519-21, and Amendments, Article Five, ls. 645-646; of the The Constitution of The United States.

The American judicial procedures, I believe, would be based upon equitable principles and rules. And if any irregularities occur – as appeared to have happened in the Hilton case – the American jurists would be more than capable of letting justice be served - calmly and objectively - without any unnecessary scurrilous outbursts from an hysterical sector of the public.

Paris Hilton has been incarcerated for a misdemeanour, and for failure to observe an instruction of law. She did not commit a felonious crime; there was, fortunately, no victim, yet the apparent magnitude of public condemnation was grossly disproportionate to the offences. When are the anti-Hilton campaigners going to recognize that this matter has been dealt with, and move on to their next celebrity?

Posted at 10:35PM on Jun 20th 2007 by Rev. Father Maximiadis

455. PRAYING IS GOOD . LETS SEE IF THAT PRAYING HELPS TO GROUND HER AS A HUMAN BEING . THAT SAID THE PARENTS IM SURE LOVE AND WANT THE BEST FOR HER BUT THEY BETTER RETHINK THERE MOTIVES.

Posted at 7:57AM on Jun 22nd 2007 by joseph caprio