Hayden Panettiere is the latest owner of this $2.6 million arrangement of block shapes, and windows.
Deceptively large on the outside, the L.A. hillside home boasts a mere three bedrooms, not including the mystery barracks on the far right. Other perks include a 360 degree view of dead foliage, and the world's largest air conditioning duct display.
Filed under: Celebrity Pay Dirt, Hayden Panettiere
1. Hmm, that means her annual property tax will be $260,000 a year. I'm thinkin' her star will dim any time now and this monstrosity of a house will be sold for the back taxes. Just sayin' . . .
Posted at 12:11PM on Nov 8th 2008 by savvydude
2. THAT HOUSE IS UGLAAAAAAAAAAAY
Posted at 12:16PM on Nov 8th 2008 by JMRV
3. GOOD LUCK in your new home, may you have peace, maybe you should have it blessed.
Posted at 12:20PM on Nov 8th 2008 by pattie in cali
4. she better hope her show doesn't get cancel!!!
Posted at 12:23PM on Nov 8th 2008 by southerngirl
5. Heroes sucks and so does this house...seriously, could a house be any less appealing?
Posted at 12:23PM on Nov 8th 2008 by MGK
6. I wouldn't want to live there. It looks like it could be in danger if there was a fire around there (all the foliage). If (or rather when) there is another earthquake, it could fall down the mountain.. Just saying.
Posted at 12:31PM on Nov 8th 2008 by Judith
7. I thought it WAS and air conditioning duct. But I guess it must be stunning on the inside, like true beauty is. Like an unopened geode. Get a hammer!
Posted at 1:04PM on Nov 8th 2008 by lola
8. OOOO.
I see the room where she touches herself at night.
Under the covers.
In the swimsuit place.
Hawt.
Posted at 1:21PM on Nov 8th 2008 by Toby Christensen
9. #1 , property taxes aren't 10% of a house's value. That would be insane. You'd be lucky if its half of 1%
Posted at 1:33PM on Nov 8th 2008 by Dude
10. Wow, she got taken bad - that house got beat with a forest of ugly sticks. WTF is she thinking? I cannot imagine what she (or anyone) could find appealing about that house. Maybe she is going to raize it and build a new one?
Posted at 1:43PM on Nov 8th 2008 by Ms_Tell_It_Like_It_Is
11. Its called modern, and a lot of people like it.
Posted at 1:44PM on Nov 8th 2008 by acrosby00
12. Doesnt matter if it is modern or traditional, it is a poor example of ANY style of architecture.
Posted at 2:00PM on Nov 8th 2008 by Ms_Tell_It_Like_It_Is
13. It looks like the left half of the patio is about to fall off the cliff. Scary.
Posted at 2:20PM on Nov 8th 2008 by Allison
14. From the L.A. County Tax Assessor's website:
"In 1978, California voters passed Proposition 13, which substantially reduced property tax rates. As a result, the maximum levy cannot exceed 1% of a property’s assessed value (plus bonded indebtedness and direct assessment taxes). Increases in assessed value are limited to 2% annually."
So that means $26,000 yearly. But the house is still ugly. A bunch of Lego squares does not make an attractive house. Beauty is definitely in the eye of the beholder on this one.
Posted at 2:24PM on Nov 8th 2008 by Mo
15. lol! Mystery barracks!
Posted at 2:47PM on Nov 8th 2008 by Mr. Jones
You can e-mail us here or call the TMZ tip line at
1-888-847-9869
