Sharon vs. Madge: Who'd You Rather?

There should be a "neither" option, but if I HAD to choose, then I'd choose Sharon.

BTW, why does Madonna always dye her hair yellow? If she's aiming for blonde, she's not succeeding.

TMZ should add the "neither" option since I don't fancy any of these happy(?) hookers.

since i wouldnt have to worry about sleeping with 1 million other men madonna has done i chose sharon!

There are still people out there who haven't slept with Madonna?

Uh, neither. As for looking their age, I'm a year younger than both, and I guarantee I look at least 20 years younger than either. They look worn, and used, and over-cosmeticized. Ugh. I don't know why Madonna insists on trying for "candy-box" cute, or child-like flirtatiousness, her time for that is long past (fifty-one isn't old, but you're well past your teeny-bop years). At least Sharon Stone looks a bit dignified in this particular shot (although her habit of wearing very short skirts and going commando has led to a bit more exposure than I ever cared to see), but the "work" is obvious. Kind of sad, but it's no more than what's to be expected of "celebrities". Real people are so much better.

I think they look rather nice. They are mature, they tranformed beautifully; but these two pictures, like so many others are not so technically flawless or inocent and cannot be simply compared. They have different style, different light, different mood.
I dont see why should anyone stick to what they once were; they live now, they are not basic instinct, nor material girl.. they are enough now.

Um Madonna looks DAMN good for being 51! Look at 51 year old who are not famous and they look MUCH older! Sharon stones neck looks HORRIBLE!